Annali italiani di chirurgia · 2023
Neither inguinoscrotal hernia nor hydrocele misunderstood giant testicular neoplasm. Case report and literature review.
ОбзорКлинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
De Luca Alessandro, Franzoso Lucia, Danese Viviana, De Luca Francesco Luca, De Luca Giuseppe Massimiliano
Аннотация
AIM: This case experience aims to question the current know-how when a masked testicle malignancy occurs, in order to achieve the correct clinical framework and avoid mistakes during surgical procedures. in the evaluation MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 36-year-old male patient was admitted with an incorrect diagnosis of left-sided incarcerated inguinoscrotal hernia, and then discovered a seminomatous testicular neoplasm matched with a hypertensive ipsilateral hydrocele. Therefore, we performed a radical epididymo-orchiectomy and referred the patient to the oncologist for adjuvant chemotherapy after discharge.
RESULTS: The surgery was perceived by the patient as the best possible treatment because the symptoms were relieved.
DISCUSSION: A 36-year-old male patient was admitted to our surgical department due to an incorrect diagnosis of leftsided incarcerated inguinoscrotal hernia, consequently to a misguided scrotal ultrasound-doppler exam. During the urgent surgical operation, we realized that we were dealing with an enormous 17x10x9 cm seminomatous testicular neoplasm matched with a hypertensive ipsilateral hydrocele. Therefore, we performed a radical epididymo-orchiectomy and referred the patient to the oncologist for adjuvant chemotherapy after discharge.
CONCLUSION: This case report points out that there may be a poor correlation between clinical findings and pathophysiologic processes affecting scrotal structures. Additional radiological investigations, such as CT scan, could clarify and confirm the clinical scenario, improving the preoperative planning and surgical outcomes.
KEY WORDS: Inguinal Hernia, Seminoma, Testicular Neoplasm.
RESULTS: The surgery was perceived by the patient as the best possible treatment because the symptoms were relieved.
DISCUSSION: A 36-year-old male patient was admitted to our surgical department due to an incorrect diagnosis of leftsided incarcerated inguinoscrotal hernia, consequently to a misguided scrotal ultrasound-doppler exam. During the urgent surgical operation, we realized that we were dealing with an enormous 17x10x9 cm seminomatous testicular neoplasm matched with a hypertensive ipsilateral hydrocele. Therefore, we performed a radical epididymo-orchiectomy and referred the patient to the oncologist for adjuvant chemotherapy after discharge.
CONCLUSION: This case report points out that there may be a poor correlation between clinical findings and pathophysiologic processes affecting scrotal structures. Additional radiological investigations, such as CT scan, could clarify and confirm the clinical scenario, improving the preoperative planning and surgical outcomes.
KEY WORDS: Inguinal Hernia, Seminoma, Testicular Neoplasm.