m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Genes & diseases · 2024

Exploiting the potential of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in overcoming tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia.

Название и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Li X, Li W, Zhang Y, Xu L, Song Y

Аннотация

The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) targeting BCR-ABL has drastically changed the treatment approach of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), greatly prolonged the life of CML patients, and improved their prognosis. However, TKI resistance is still a major problem with CML patients, reducing the efficacy of treatment and their quality of life. TKI resistance is mainly divided into BCR-ABL-dependent and BCR-ABL-independent resistance. Now, the main clinical strategy addressing TKI resistance is to switch to newly developed TKIs. However, data have shown that these new drugs may cause serious adverse reactions and intolerance and cannot address all resistance mutations. Therefore, finding new therapeutic targets to overcome TKI resistance is crucial and the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) has emerged as a focus. The UPS mediates the degradation of most proteins in organisms and controls a wide range of physiological processes. In recent years, the study of UPS in hematological malignant tumors has resulted in effective treatments, such as bortezomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma. In CML, the components of UPS cooperate or antagonize the efficacy of TKI by directly or indirectly affecting the ubiquitination of BCR-ABL, interfering with CML-related signaling pathways, and negatively or positively affecting leukemia stem cells. Some of these molecules may help overcome TKI resistance and treat CML. In this review, the mechanism of TKI resistance is briefly described, the components of UPS are introduced, existing studies on UPS participating in TKI resistance are listed, and UPS as the therapeutic target and strategies are discussed.

Перевод полного текста: Перевод в очереди

Читать найденный полный текст

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Background

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a unique type of leukemia first discovered in the 1840s, accounts for about 15% of adult leukemia cases, and is characterized by uncontrolled growth of myeloid cells. 1 , 2 , 3 According to a systematic analysis from 1990 to 2017, 34,179 CML cases were reported globally in 2017 with 24,054 deaths. 4 At present, sufficient studies have confirmed that the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome, a short chromosome produced by the reciprocal translocation between the breakpoint cluster region (BCR) gene and the ABL1 kinase Abelson (ABL) gene located between chromosomes 9 and 22, is the only driving factor for CML. 5 The fusion gene can encode and activate chimeric BCR-ABL protein, and then exert its tyrosine kinase function which affects the downstream signaling pathways, leading to leukemia. 6

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are a current treatment agent that has shown outstanding anti-CML effects. From the first generation TKI imatinib to the first novel TKI targeting ABL myristoyl pocket (STAMP inhibitor) asciminib, the treatments have reduced the burden of disease more effectively and faster than other treatments. TKI agents also provide a large number of choices for patients and greatly reduce the number of patients who develop accelerated or blast phase disease. 7 , 8 Although a number of TKIs have emerged, many patients still fail to respond to treatment because of TKI resistance, mainly driven by BCR-ABL-dependent and independent resistance. 9 The presence of drug resistance and treatment failure warrant the search for more targets in CML therapy.

Ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) is the main regulatory factor targeting protein degradation in eukaryotic cells. It plays an important role in maintaining the balance of protein turnover in vivo and affects a wide range of biological processes. 10 In the field of hematological oncology, UPS has shown its therapeutic potential. Bortezomib, a selective inhibitor of the 26S proteasome derived from the UPS, has become the first-line combination therapy for multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma. 11 Moreover, a few components of UPS, such as E1/E2/E3 ligase, deubiquitinases (DUBs), proteasome inhibitors, and ubiquitin-like proteins, play an important role in the occurrence and development of many other hematological tumors. As a protein degrader, UPS may be a good potential candidate in the treatment of CML and is expected to effectively overcome TKI resistance to improve the prognosis of CML patients.

In this review, the types and mechanisms of TKI resistance in CML treatment are systematically described, and the composition of UPS and the process of protein degradation are introduced. Based on the literature, a classified introduction of the various components of UPS that participate in the occurrence and development of CML and TKI resistance is provided. Additionally, potential targets to overcome TKI resistance and treat CML are summarized. As the most cutting-edge technology related to UPS, the prospect of PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras (PROTAC) technology is also reviewed.

A brief introduction to TKI resistance

Since the 1990s, the successful development of TKI targeting BCR-ABL has ushered in the era of small molecule targeted drugs. 12 Up to 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved five types of TKIs for CML, including the first-generation imatinib, the second-generation dasatinib, nilotinib, and bosutinib, and the third-generation ponatinib. In 2019, China approved the second-generation TKI, flumatinib for the treatment of CML. 13 Although the use of TKIs has greatly benefited patients, 20% of patients fail to achieve the desired effect and develop TKI resistance immediately after the initial beneficial effect is seen. Most of these patients also have a high probability of entering the acute phase or blast phase, resulting in treatment failure. 7 , 14

The mechanisms of TKI resistance are mainly divided into BCR-ABL-dependent resistance and BCR-ABL-independent resistance. The mechanisms of BCR-ABL-dependent resistance include BCR-ABL mutation, BCR-ABL overexpression, DNA repair defect, and genomic instability. The mechanisms of BCR-ABL-independent resistance include the activation of alternate prosurvival signaling pathways, leukemic stem cells (LSCs), and bone marrow microenvironment ( Fig. 1 ). 9 , 15 Figure 1 The mechanisms of TKI resistance. The mechanisms of TKI resistance are mainly divided into BCR-ABL-dependent and BCR-ABL-independent resistance. The BCR-ABL-dependent resistance includes BCR-ABL mutation (mutations of the BCR-ABL kinase domain, mutations outside the BCR-ABL kinase domains, and the compound mutations), BCR-ABL overexpression, DNA repair defect, and genomic instability. The BCR-ABL-independent resistance includes the activation of alternate prosurvival signaling pathways, leukemic stem cells (LSCs), bone marrow microenvironment, etc . TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Figure 1

Figure 1 The mechanisms of TKI resistance. The mechanisms of TKI resistance are mainly divided into BCR-ABL-dependent and BCR-ABL-independent resistance. The BCR-ABL-dependent res…
Figure 1 The mechanisms of TKI resistance. The mechanisms of TKI resistance are mainly divided into BCR-ABL-dependent and BCR-ABL-independent resistance. The BCR-ABL-dependent resistance includes BCR-ABL mutation (mutations of the BCR-ABL kinase domain, mutations outside the BCR-ABL kinase domains, and the compound mutations), BCR-ABL overexpression, DNA repair defect, and genomic instability. The BCR-ABL-independent resistance includes the activation of alternate prosurvival signaling pathways, leukemic stem cells (LSCs), bone marrow microenvironment, etc . TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Figure 1

BCR-ABL-dependent resistance

BCR-ABL mutations

BCR-ABL mutations can be divided into mutations of the BCR-ABL kinase domain, mutations outside the BCR-ABL kinase domains, and compound mutations. Mutations of the BCR-ABL kinase domain are mutations in the ABL kinase domain or other kinase domains that change the conformation of BCR-ABL or completely hinder the binding of drugs to BCR-ABL, resulting in drug resistance. The mutation sites can be divided into four categories: (i) the ATP-binding P-loop, between amino acids (aa) 244 and 255; (ii) the imatinib mesylate direct binding site between aa 315 and 317; (iii) the C-loop (catalytic domain) between aa 350 and 363; and (iv) the A-loop (activation loop) between aa 381 and 402. 16

The second and third-generation TKIs work by optimizing the affinity and binding sites of TKI to ABL kinase domains according to different mutation spectra. This mechanism is effective for most mutations except the T315I mutation, creating more drugs available for patients with TKI drug resistance. The T315I mutation, also known as the gatekeeper mutation, is the most common, occurring in 4% of imatinib mesylate-resistant CML patients, causing resistance to all second and third-generation TKIs. 9 It has been reported that olverembatinib developed by Chinese pharmaceutical companies is effective for imatinib mesylate resistance. According to results of phase I and II clinical studies, olverembatinib monotherapy had good efficacy and tolerance in patients with CML-chronic phase and CML-acute phase patients, other TKI-tolerant CML-chronic phase and CML-acute phase patients as well as patients with T315I mutation. 17 , 18 , 19

Mutations outside the BCR-ABL kinase domains and the compound mutations are uncommon. The former refers to the mutation of the SH2, SH3, and Cap domains which are involved in the automatic inhibition of ABL kinase. Compound mutations refer to two mutations within one BCR-ABL protein or two or more point mutations within several BCR-ABL proteins. 16 It is reported that after ponatinib treatment, the secondary drug resistance mutations in CML patients with T315I mutations are defined as compound mutations based on T315I, including T315L, Q252H + T315I, and F311I + T315I, which challenges effective treatment. 20

BCR-ABL overexpression

CML genomic amplification or overexpression of BCR-ABL transcripts is often detected in patients with TKI resistance. A study demonstrated a relationship between BCR-ABL overexpression and BCR-ABL mutation, while in the absence of BCR-ABL amplification, mutations did not occur. This suggests that BCR-ABL overexpression may be an early manifestation of TKI resistance mutations, but more confirmatory evidence is needed. 21

DNA repair defect and genomic instability

Previous studies have shown that the repair of defective DNA and genomic instability caused by an imbalance of DNA damage response is related to the clonal evolution of CML. This evolution is an important promoting factor for the occurrence of TKI resistance and the malignant transformation of CML. 22 , 23 In a retrospective study, 81 CML patients underwent targeted sequencing involving 386 genes. The results suggest that additional sex combs-like 1 mutation was the most common genetic damage in all stages of CML except ABL, followed by histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2D and pyruvate carboxylase in CML-chronic phase, BCL6 corepressor like 1, and runt-related transcription factor 1 in CML-acute phase and runt-related transcription factor 1 and Wilms tumor 1 in CML-blastic crisis. These genetic damages are cumulative in the development of CML from chronic phase to blastic crisis, which may lead to poor prognosis. 24

BCR-ABL-independent resistance

Activation of alternate prosurvival signaling pathways

Although TKIs inhibit the activity of BCR-ABL kinase, CML cells can activate alternative signaling pathways to maintain their survival. Alternative signaling pathways known to date are JAK (Janus kinase)/STAT (signal transducer and activator of transcription), RAF/MEK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase, PI3K (phosphoinositide 3-kinase)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin, RAS/mitogen-activated protein kinase, forkhead box O1, B cell leukemia/lymphoma 2, SRC, etc . 25 , 26 , 27 From the treatment perspective, alternative signaling pathways are targeted to overcome drug resistance. A JAK inhibitor, ruxolitinib, when combined with TKI, was reported to reduce the phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, promote CML cell death, and induced secondary remission in patients with TKI resistance. 28

Leukemic stem cells

LSCs are naturally insensitive to TKIs. TKI insensitivity is not only the root cause of TKI resistance in CML patients but also an important factor that challenges recovery and drug withdrawal. 29 Although the survival of LSCs does not rely on the activities of BCR-ABL kinase, their survival is regulated by multiple signaling pathways (Wnt/β-catenin, Notch, transforming growth factor-beta), epigenetic regulatory protein (silent information regulator factor 2-related enzyme 1, protein arginine methyltransferase 5/7), transcriptional factors (p53, forkhead box M1, noncanonical nuclear factor-kappa B), cellular metabolic regulatory molecules (solute carrier 15 membrane proteins PEPT2) and other molecules. 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 The involvement of these molecules and pathways in LSCs' survival makes them potential targets for the eradication of LSCs. For example, venetoclax has demonstrated outstanding performance in the treatment of CML. Preclinical studies have shown that venetoclax combined with TKI effectively eradicated LSCs. 38

Bone marrow microenvironment

Abnormalities in the bone marrow microenvironment are closely related to the occurrence and development of leukemia. Cell–cell interaction mediated by various receptors in the bone marrow stroma, integrin participating in cell adhesion, hypoxic bone marrow environment, and cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors (C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4, interleukin-17, interleukin-1β) secreted by stromal cells are involved in TKI resistance. 16 , 39 Ravi Bhatia et al reported that changes in bone marrow stromal niches mediated by tumor necrosis factor alpha in CML enhanced the maintenance and growth of LSCs through C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 1–CXC chemokine receptor 2 signaling and inhibition of CXC chemokine receptor 2 can effectively eradicate CML LSCs and contribute to TKI resistance. 40

Other mechanisms

Except for activation of alternate prosurvival signaling pathways, LSCs, and bone marrow microenvironment, there are also other mechanisms of BCR-ABL-independent resistance such as the abnormal activity of transporters, clonal abnormalities, dysregulated epigenetic modifications, the up-regulation of inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs), and increased autophagy and mitochondrial metabolisms. Since the above mechanisms have been described in detail in some articles, we will not describe them too much here. 16

UPS

A brief introduction to UPS

The UPS mediates the degradation of about 90% of proteins in organisms. Protein degradation is essential for regulating cell function and maintaining protein stability. The UPS consists of the ubiquitin (ub)-activating enzyme (E1), the ub-conjugating enzyme (E2), the ub-ligating enzyme (E3), ubiquitin, and the 26S proteasome. 41 , 42

Ub is a highly conserved protein containing 76 amino acids with a molecular weight of 8.5 kDa. It contains seven lysine residues, namely K6, K11, K27, K29, K33, K48, and K63, which attach to substrate proteins in the form of single molecules or through specific heteropeptide bonds to form branched or forked polymer chains. 43 , 44 , 45 The E1 enzyme is small in number and exists as two subtypes based on size, at 110 kDa and 117 kDa, which come from the same gene and mRNA. 46 E2 on another hand is sized within 14–35 kDa and contains a conservative catalytic domain (ubiquitin-conjugating domain). 47 There are about 40 E2s, which can be divided into four categories; class Ⅰ has only the ubiquitin-conjugating domain, while class Ⅱ and Ⅲ have N- or C-terminal domain respectively, and class IV contains both the N- and C-terminal domains, whereby the different domains affect the molecular weight and function of E2. 48 Some E2s, such as ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2O and baculoviral IAP repeat containing 6, have both E2 and E3 activities. These E2s can directly bind to the substrate protein and mediate ubiquitin modification independent of other E3, called E2/E3 hybrid ubiquitin-protein ligase. 49 , 50 The largest in number, there are over 600 E3 ubiquitin ligases that can specifically recognize and mediate the ubiquitination of substrate proteins. E3 ubiquitin ligases are divided into three categories: homologous with E6-associated protein C-terminus, really interesting new gene (RING), and ring-between-ring. E3s are the most important components in UPS, determining which proteins will be degraded. 51 , 52 , 53 The 26S proteasome is a large (1500–2000 kDa) multi-subunit complex in the nucleus and cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells, including a catalytic core 20S proteasome and two regulatory subunits 19S proteasome. These proteasomes can recognize and degrade substrate proteins labeled by polyubiquitin chains. 10

The process of ubiquitin can be reversed by specific deubiquitinases (DUBs), which balance the ubiquitination under the control of the E3 ubiquitin ligase and DUBs. There are more than 100 DUBs that are divided into seven categories: Ub C-terminal hydrolases (UCHs), ub-specific proteases (USPs), Machado-Josephin domain proteases, ovarian tumor proteases, motif interacting with Ub-containing novel DUB family, zinc-finger-containing ub peptidase, and Jab1/Mov34/MPN + protease. The first six categories are cysteine-based DUBs and the last one belongs to zinc-binding metalloproteases. 54

Ubiquitin-like proteins have been a hot topic in recent years. It is a group of proteins that are related to ub sequences and have a similar three-dimensional structure. 55 They are mainly divided into two types: ubiquitin-like proteins (type I) and ubiquitin-like domain proteins (type II). The C-terminal of ubiquitin-like protein has one or two glycine residues and this is a characteristic sequence motif that is responsible for covalently linking to the substrates. Ubiquitin-like domain proteins lack C-terminal diglycine motifs and cannot bind to the target, but they can play a role in protein–protein interaction. At present, the ubiquitin-like proteins that can function as protein modifiers are autophagy-related 8/12, F locus adjacent transcript 10, fau and its ubiquitin-like domain, histone monoubiquitination 1, interferon-stimulated gene 15, neural precursor cell expressed developmentally down-regulated protein 8 (NEDD8), small ubiquitin-related modifier, ubiquitin-fold modifier 1, and ubiquitin related modifier 1. They are involved in important biological activities such as nuclear transport, proteolysis, translation, autophagy, and antiviral pathways. 56 , 57

The types of ubiquitin modification include mono-ubiquitin, multi-site mono-ubiquitin, and polyubiquitin modifications. Polyubiquitin modification of K48 and K63 is the most studied. The former mainly mediates the degradation of substrate protein, while the latter mainly affects the localization and function of the substrate protein. 58

Ubiquitin and deubiquitination cooperate to maintain the balance of protein metabolism in eukaryotic cells. 59 Here, E1 activates ub after consuming ATP, while the activated ub is transferred to the cysteine residue of E2, followed by coupling of the ubiquitin ligase E3 to the glycine at the end of ub with substrate protein or a specific lysine (K) on the ub polymerization chain. In the end, the 26S proteasome degrades the substrate protein labeled by the ub polymerization chain. On the contrary, the DUBs can remove the ub chain from the substrate protein, thus reversing the ubiquitination of the substrate protein ( Fig. 2 ). 51 Figure 2 Overview of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). First, E1 activates ub after consuming ATP. Then the activated ub is transferred to the cysteine residue of E2, followed by coupling of the ubiquitin ligase E3 to the glycine at the end of ub with substrate protein or a specific lysine (K) on the ub polymerization chain. In the end, the 26S proteasome degrades the substrate protein labeled by the ub polymerization chain. The deubiquitinases (DUBs) can remove the ub chain from the substrate protein, thus reversing the ubiquitination of the substrate protein. Figure 2

Figure 2 Overview of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). First, E1 activates ub after consuming ATP. Then the activated ub is transferred to the cysteine residue of E2, followe…
Figure 2 Overview of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). First, E1 activates ub after consuming ATP. Then the activated ub is transferred to the cysteine residue of E2, followed by coupling of the ubiquitin ligase E3 to the glycine at the end of ub with substrate protein or a specific lysine (K) on the ub polymerization chain. In the end, the 26S proteasome degrades the substrate protein labeled by the ub polymerization chain. The deubiquitinases (DUBs) can remove the ub chain from the substrate protein, thus reversing the ubiquitination of the substrate protein. Figure 2

The relationship between UPS and cancer

Ubiquitination regulates many complex cellular processes, including protein degradation, protein–protein interactions, endocytosis, cell cycle progression, and the activation or inactivation of substrates. 51 Therefore, any functional mutation or abnormal expression of UPS components can lead to certain diseases, such as tumors, neurodegenerative diseases, and adaptive or innate immune-related diseases. The physiological function of ubiquitination is not only in the hydrolyzed proteins, but also in non-hydrolyzed proteins, such as the polyprotein complex assembly, inflammatory signaling, autophagy, DNA repair, and regulation of enzyme activity. 60 , 61 , 62

In tumors, ubiquitination may cause activation or inactivation of tumorigenic pathways. Abnormal expression of E3 ligase and DUBs is associated with human malignant tumors through the regulation of the activity and degradation of tumor-promoting or tumor-suppressor proteins. Typical examples include cell cycle-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B (p27), p53, transforming growth factor-beta, and noncanonical nuclear factor-kappa B. 63 , 64 , 65 Unlike kinases, most components of the UPS do not have typical catalytic sites and require dynamic rearrangement of a variety of protein–protein interactions, which make it difficult for the system to be inhibited by small molecules. However, with the progress of science and technology, a deeper understanding of ubiquitin biology, and the use of the latest technologies, great progress, such as the application of PROTACs and hydrophobic tags (HyT), has been made in the reactivation of the UPS. 66 , 67

Target UPS to treat hematological malignancies

In recent years, a large number of clinical trials have been conducted on compounds targeting UPS, and some compounds have been approved for the treatment of hematological tumors. The most relevant example is the development of bortezomib, a selective inhibitor of 26S proteasome, which has become the first-line combination therapy option for multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma and is also being studied in other malignant tumors. 11 , 68 In addition, thalidomide derivatives, such as lenalidomide, have shown good efficacy in myelodysplastic syndrome, laying the foundation for the development of leukemia-related drugs. Existing studies are not limited to optimizing proteasome inhibitors, inhibiting a single E3 ligase or specific proteasome-related DUB enzyme, but using E1 enzyme as a target or developing a PROTAC system to stimulate ubiquitin and protein degradation has also gained great attraction.

E1 inhibitors are considered to have more extensive and effective biological effects than proteasome inhibitors because they interfere with proteasome degradation and ub-dependent signaling pathways. MLN4924 can inhibit E1 enzymes which are in charge of cancer neddylation, and phase III clinical trials ( NCT04090736 , NCT03268954 ) have been carried out in patients with leukemia. 69 MLN7243, which belongs to a first-in-class ubiquitin-activating enzyme inhibitor, is currently conducting phase I clinical trials ( NCT03816319 ) in patients with leukemia.

Although the extensive protein–protein interaction of E3 ligase limits the research and development of E3 ligase inhibitors, its properties that determine the specificity of ubiquitin substrates are of great attraction to researchers and many E3-based drugs are in clinical trials. Iberdomide (CC-220) is a cereblon E3 ligase regulator, which has a strong ability to degrade the IKAROS family zinc finger 1/3. 70 Clinical trials have been carried out in B-cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma. In addition, other similar cereblon E3 ligase regulators are conducting clinical trials of related monotherapy or combination therapy: CC-12 for diffuse large B cell lymphoma, CC-90009 and BTX-1188 for acute myeloid leukemia, CFT-7455 for multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, CC-99282 for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and CC-92480 for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Because DUBs can inhibit the degradation of some oncoproteins, DUB inhibitors have the potential to become a cancer treatment strategy. However, due to its lack of specificity, the reported clinical trials are limited. USP11 inhibitors (mitoxantrone) ( NCT02724163 , NCT05313958 ) and USP14 inhibitors (6-mercaptopurine ( NCT00866918 , NCT00482833 ), 6-thioguanine ( NCT00549848 )) are currently being studied in leukemia.

Compared with the above inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors are the most successful models. At present, a variety of drugs have been published or are under development (bortexomib, carfilzomib, ixazomib, oprozomib, delanzomib, and marizomib). Bortexomib is effective in anti-multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma. The efficacy of oprozomib monotherapy was confirmed in multiple myeloma. 71 Delanzomib is highly toxic and no updated results have been reported. 72 At present, the problems of proteasome inhibitors to be solved urgently are the emergence of drug resistance, poor pharmacokinetics, and side effects.

The UPS in CML TKI-resistance

E3 ligase

SKP2

The S-phase kinase-associated protein 2 (SKP2), also known as p45, is a key component of the SKP1-cullin1-F-box complex and is responsible for substrate recognition. 73 , 74 SKP2 mainly acts as an oncoprotein, and p27 is its classic substrate protein. p27 is a kind of kinase inhibitor that is dependent on cyclin and mainly drives cells from the G1 cell division phase to the S phase. SKP2-mediated ubiquitination of p27 plays an important role in a variety of cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric cancer, and lung cancer, 75 , 76 , 77 while recent evidence additionally revealed that SKP2 is closely related to BCR-ABL-induced CML.

BCR-ABL can disrupt cell cycle regulation by disabling p27. A study found that in BCR-ABL overexpressed cell lines, p27 was negatively correlated with SKP2 expression. The inhibition of BCR-ABL would lead to the down-regulation of SKP2 and up-regulation of p27, causing cell cycle arrest. During BCR-ABL infection, the survival time of mice receiving SKP2 −/− bone marrow transplantation was longer than that of SKP2 +/+ recipients, with higher nucleus expression of p27. This study confirmed that SKP2 plays an important role in BCR-ABL-induced leukemia, and inhibition of the BCR-ABL/SKP2/p27 axis may be useful in the treatment of CML patients. 78

BCR-ABL was also found to regulate the stability of the SKP2 protein. After knocking down BCR-ABL or imatinib treatment, the SKP2 protein was down-regulated earlier than its mRNA, and the protein's half-life decreased. Further studies confirm that knocking down BCR-ABL or imatinib treatment decreased the level of Emi1, an endogenous inhibitor of E3 ligase APC/Cdh1, which mediates SKP2 degradation, thus promoting the degradation of SKP2 protein and inhibits the proliferation of CML cells. 79

MYC is a classical oncoprotein, which is also associated with SKP2-participating CML. A correlation was previously noted between the mRNA levels of MYC and SKP2 in CML bone marrow samples. The conditional expression of MYC in K562 cells increased SKP2 mRNA and protein expression as well as decreased the p27 protein. MYC could also bind to a promoter region of the SKP2 gene and silencing SKP2 could block the regulation of p27 by MYC. These data suggest that MYC acts directly on SKP2, positively regulates SKP2 expression, and inhibits p27. 80

In the K562 cell line, low-dose imatinib treatment induced proliferation arrest, erythroid differentiation, and up-regulated p27. A study found that MYC inhibited erythroid differentiation induced by imatinib and eliminated the up-regulation of p27. Studies that evaluated mechanisms revealed that this process partly depends on the expression of SKP2 induced by MYC. These studies additionally confirm the importance of the MYC/SKP2/p27 axis in CML progress. 81

Cyclin-dependent kinase subunit 1 (CKS1) is the key rate-limiting component of Skp1-Cullin1-SKP2 (SKP1-cullin1-F-box (SKP2)) ubiquitin ligase, which regulates cell cycle inhibitors, connects SKP2 with p27, and promotes p27 ubiquitination. The study of V Tomiatti indicated that CKS1 expression was increased in CML, and the absence of CKS1 led to the accumulation of SKP1-cullin1-F-box (Skp2)/CKS1 substrate p21, p27, p57, and p130. These changes weakened hematopoietic stem cell proliferation, slowed regeneration after stress, and prolonged hematopoietic stem cell quiescence. Concurrently, CKS1 is also closely related to the independent cloning of cytokines induced by BCR-ABL. 82

Bortezomib, a protease inhibitor, has been approved to be used in patients with multiple myeloma. The drug down-regulates the expression of SKP2, promotes the accumulation of p27 Kip1, and increases the apoptosis of CML cells, and therefore, is expected to become a new treatment of choice for patients with CML. 83

In another study, Chen et al found that the high expression of SKP2 is beneficial to the proliferation of CML cells, while cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element binding protein (CREB) in the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway positively regulates the expression of SKP2, and the PI3K/AKT/CREB/SKP2 axis regulates the sensitivity of K562 cells to imatinib. 84

Taken together, the BCR-ABL/SKP2/p27 axis is key in the occurrence and development of CML, and targeting SKP2 may show great potential in TKI-resistance CML.

CBL

The Casitas B-lineage lymphoma (CBL) gene encodes the E3 ubiquitin ligase and signal adaptor. The gene's repeated somatic mutations occur in myeloid neoplasms, 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 including in 10%–20% of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia patients and 10% of children with juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia, and are associated with poor prognosis. 93 , 94 , 95 CBL affects the occurrence, development, and drug therapy of CML through its function of mediating substrate degradation and transferring signals.

Both TPbeta and FPalpha are chimeric oncogenes encoding constitutively active tyrosine kinase proteins found in myeloid neoplasms. Federica Toffalini's team found that in contrast to the rapid degradation of corresponding wild-type receptors after activation, the TPbeta and FPalpha hybrids were more stable and could stimulate cell proliferation more effectively. A subsequent result found that the escape of the two heterozygotes was related to the decreased degree of ubiquitination mediated by CBL. 96

Arsenic has been used to treat acute promyelocytic leukemia and is also able to induce cell apoptosis and target BCR-ABL degradation in CML cells. 97 , 98 Mao et al further confirmed that arsenic sulfide (As (4) S (4)) can promote the ubiquitination of BCR-ABL by up-regulating the expression of c-CBL. This data provides a theoretical application of arsenic combined with TKI in CML patients and treatment options for patients with TKI resistance. 99

Moreover, CBL gene mutations can be detected in a small number of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. In order to study the role of mutant CBL in the pathogenesis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, Yuichiro Nakata constructed CBL conditional knock-in mice expressing chronic myelomonocytic leukemia-related CBL mutant CBL Q367P . The mutant has the typical characteristics of continuous proliferation of bone marrow monocytes, multilineage dysplasia, and splenomegaly (chronic myelomonocytic leukemia). The results suggest that the PI3K-AKT and JAK-STAT signaling pathways of hematopoietic stem cells in CBL Q367P mice were activated, the process of the cell cycle was accelerated, and the activity of the chemokine–chemokine receptor was enhanced. Additionally, the CBL Q367P mutant enhanced the activity of hematopoietic stem cells by up-regulating GEM gene expression. 100

Belizaire et al combined functional analysis with global mass spectrometry and found that in CBL mutant cells, the interaction of activated Lck/yes-related protein tyrosine kinase (LYN) and mutant CBL drives the phosphorylation of CBL, the recruitment of PIK3R1, and the activation of the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. Dasatinib treatment blocks these processes and inhibits the proliferation of CBL mutant cell lines and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia cells, by inhibiting LYN. 101

Interestingly, a tyrosine kinase network composed of a TAM receptor, AXL, and the cytoplasmic enzymes, LYN and SYK, is associated with CML nilotinib resistance. 102 Romain Gioia and colleagues found that the up-regulation of AXL and LYN in nilotinib-resistant CML cells was found to be associated with the down-regulation of CBL. Overexpression of CBL, on the other hand, reduced the expression of AXL and LYN and increased the sensitivity of cells to nilotinib. CBL was also discovered to inhibit the AXL/SYK signal by affecting the protein stability of AXL, thus promoting the transcription of LYN. 103

The activation of JAK2 is also an important carcinogenic factor for hematological tumors. Lv et al found that CBL regulates the ubiquitination of JAK2, blocks JAK2 signal transduction, and inhibits cell growth, as well as delays the progression of invasive myeloid leukemia in mice. 104

FBXW7

Leukemia-initiating cells (LIC) cannot be effectively eradicated by imatinib, which is one of the causes of disease recurrence in patients with CML. It is thus, of great clinical significance to explore the molecular mechanism of its functional regulation.

The F-box protein Fbxw7 is the substrate recognition component of the Cullin-1/SKP1-cullin1-F-box complex, which targets the ubiquitination of specific substrate proteins (classical oncoproteins such as NOTCH1, TP53, and SKP1) and is reported to play a key role in maintaining the resting state of adult hematopoietic stem cells. 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 c-MYC is closely related to cell proliferation and quiescence, and it has been reported that the abnormal cell cycle caused by the accumulation of c-MYC in hematopoietic stem cells and subsequent hematopoietic stem cell failure, is related to the loss of FBXW7. 111 , 112 Based on the above background, Linsey Reavie and his team used CML as a LIC-dependent malignant tumor model. It was found that knocking down FBXW7 leads to the overexpression of c-MYC, inhibits the initiation of CML induced by BCR-ABL, and limits the survival and maintenance of CML LIC by activating the p53 signaling pathway. Salvage experiments show that reducing the expression of c-MYC or inhibiting the activation of the p53 signal pathway can ensure the survival and maintenance of LIC. In the same year, Shoichiro Takeishi's research showed that after deleting FBXW7, LIC was more sensitive to imatinib. The combined application of targeting FBXW7 and imatinib greatly increased the depletion of LIC. The outcome from these two studies shows the great potential of FBXW7 as an attractive target for overcoming drug-resistant CML. 113 , 114

CHIP

Degradation of BCR-ABL is one of the effective ways to overcome CML TKI resistance. Carboxyl terminus of the Hsc70-interacting protein (CHIP) is a negative regulator of Hsc70 chaperone ATPase activity and an E3 ubiquitin ligase for the quality control of unfolded or misfolded proteins. 115 , 116 , 117 Fujiko Tsukahara's study found that both E3 ubiquitin enzymes, CHIP and c-CBL, promoted the degradation of BCR-ABL protein and inhibited BCR-ABL-dependent cell growth. The former degraded immature BCR-ABL while the latter degraded mature BCR-ABL. CHIP recognizes BCR-ABL through B cell leukemia/lymphoma 2-associated athanogene-1 (BAG1), which has a high affinity for BCR-ABL. The affinity is enhanced by CHIP and heat shock protein 90 and was inhibited by imatinib and HSC70. CHIP also promotes the binding of BAG1 to BCR-ABL by inhibiting HSC70, while BAG1 promotes the binding of immature BCR-ABL to proteasome. 118

In another study, Hu's team found that the checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitors, AZD7762 and MK-8776 had significant killing effects on drug-resistant or non-drug-resistant CML cell lines and primary cells, but conferred less damage to normal cells. Checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitors promote apoptosis of CML cells by targeting BCR-ABL, which depends on the CHIP-mediated ubiquitin degradation pathway. 119

Another team designed a chimeric ubiquitin ligase SH2-U-box, whereby SH2 comes from the adaptor protein Grb2 and is responsible for binding activated BCR-ABL. Moreover, the U-box from CHIP acts as the E3 ubiquitin ligase domain, targeting BCR-ABL with or without T315I mutation for ubiquitination. The results suggest that the SH2-U-box can significantly promote the apoptosis of CML cells, inhibit the growth of K562-nude mouse transplanted tumor or K562R-server combined immune-deficiency mouse transplanted tumor, primary CML cells, and downstream signaling pathway of BCR-ABL. 120 To sum up, CHIP plays an important role in targeting the BCR-ABL protein degradation pathway, and more data are needed on the molecular mechanisms of CHIP in overcoming CML resistance.

SIAH2

As an E3 ubiquitin ligase, seven in absentia homolog 2 (SIAH2) participates in the degradation of many proteins and affects several signal pathways, such as RAS, hippo, and hypoxia response. 121 In CML, SIAH2 affects the efficacy of TKI by regulating hypoxia response and participating in the self-renewal of leukemic stem cells. Huang et al showed that the expression of SIAH2 in CML-blastic crisis patients was higher than that in CML-chronic phase patients, and its expression in TKI-resistant cell lines was higher than that in TKI-non-resistant cell lines under a hypoxia environment.

Vitamin K3, an inhibitor of SIAH2, can change the expression of the hypoxia-related molecules, PHD3, HIF1, and VEGF as well as increase the sensitivity of imatinib. 122 Chun Shik Park's team found that Krüppel-like factor 4 gene deletion can increase levels of dual-specificity tyrosine-(Y)-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 2 (DYRK2). This inhibits the survival and self-renewal of CML stem cells by consuming c-Myc protein and activating the p53 signal pathway. SIAH2 can mediate the ubiquitination of DYRK2, while vitamin K3 can promote apoptosis and damage the self-renewal ability of LSCs by stabilizing DYRK2. 123 These results suggest that SIAH2 plays an important role in overcoming the TKI resistance of CML.

TRAF6

Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) is a member of the TRAF family and one of the most important E3 ubiquitin ligases. It plays an important role in a variety of tumors including lung and liver cancer and is closely related to autophagy and inflammation. 124 , 125 , 126 In the past two years, studies found that TRAF6 is involved in the occurrence and development of leukemia. Tomoya Muto's team confirmed that the loss of TRAF6 in preleukemic cells is one of the causes of myeloid leukemia, and its mechanism may be related to the stem cell characteristics of the MYC oncogene. TRAF6 blocks the function of the MYC oncogene by antagonizing the acetylation of MYC. 127

Another study found that TRAF6 is associated with TKI resistance in CML patients. Grancalcin is highly expressed in imatinib-resistant CML-chronic phase patients, and its inhibition of CML cell apoptosis is related to the activation of autophagy. The results of the mechanism-based study suggested that grancalcin induced the K63-linked polyubiquitination of TRAF6 and led to its dimerization. The TRAF6 then activates the ubiquitination of unc-51-like autophagy-activating kinase 1 (ULK1), a key downstream autophagy regulator, while the grancalcin-TRAF6-ULK1 regulatory axis regulates imatinib resistance by inducing autophagy. 128

Others

The large HERC E3 ubiquitin ligase family members, HERC1 and HERC2, can interfere with a wide range of biological processes, but there are relatively few studies of their mechanisms in hematological tumors. Some studies have demonstrated a close relationship between HERC1 and BCR-ABL, which can be directly tyrosine phosphorylated by ABL kinase. 129 In addition, the expression of HERC1 and HERC2 was negatively correlated with BCR-ABL and was time-dependent towards TKIs. The results also suggested that the differential expression of HERC1 is related to the differentiation pedigree of leukemic cells. 130

While exploring the mechanism of drug resistance in CML, a study found that the inactivation of the cullin3 adapter gene encoding leucine zipper-like transcription regulator 1 led to increased activity of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway and reduced sensitivity to TKIs. Further results suggest that leucine zipper-like transcription regulator 1 regulates the ubiquitination of RAS and the activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. 131

Sun-Yong Kim and colleagues found that a non-thermal plasma-treated solution induced the death of a variety of leukemic cells (acute myeloid leukemia and CML). Mechanism-based studies revealed that non-thermal plasma-treated solution-derived reactive oxygen species kill leukemic cells by affecting the expression of E3 ubiquitin ligase ring finger protein 126 and lysosomal function to mediate the ubiquitination of mammalian target of rapamycin, which provides a new therapeutic option for chemotherapy-resistant leukemia. 132

Yin et al found that berberine significantly inhibited the cell viability of imatinib-resistant and non-resistant cells by recruiting E3 ubiquitin ligase leucine-rich repeat and sterile alpha motif containing-1 (LRSAM1) to degrade BCR-ABL through the autophagy lysosome pathway. 133 Tamalika Paul's research further indicated that the activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase in mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway can promote the expression of E3 ubiquitin ligase, itchy E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, enhance the binding of this E3 to FADD-like interleukin-1beta-converting enzyme-inhibitory protein and thus promote the ubiquitination of the protein. This promotion then kills imatinib-resistant leukemic cells (K562-R) by down-regulating the anti-apoptotic protein. 134

Based on the above studies, an in-depth understanding of E3 ligases will help to explore the mechanism of CML and drug resistance and provide a new treatment strategy for CML drug-resistant patients ( Fig. 3 and Table 1 ). Figure 3 The role of E3 ligase and deubiquitinases (DUBs) in TKI resistance. For the E3 ligase, CHIP, LRSAM1, and Casitas B-lineage lymphoma (CBL) can directly target the ubiquitination of BCR-ABL and CBL can then affect TKI resistance via PI3K/AKT and JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Down-regulated FBXW7 can overcome TKI resistance by increasing the MYC protein expression and activating p53. On the contrary, low expression of SIAH2 inhibits the MYC expression by up-regulating DYRK2 to overcome TKI resistance. SKP2 can be regulated by EMIL, MYC, and PI3K/AKT/CREB axis and affect TKI resistance by negative control of p27. Besides, the GCA/TRAF6/ULK1 and LZTR1/RAS/MAPK axis can also help to confront TKI resistance. For the DUBs, USP9X, USP7, and USP25 can directly deubiquitinate BCR-ABL and USP10 can indirectly deubiquitinate BCR-ABL via SKP2. BCR-ABL can affect USP47 through RAS/ERK and STAT5 signaling pathways and further positively regulate Y-box binding protein 1 (YB-1). Also, BCR-ABL/STAT5/miR-202-5P axis can regulate USP16 and the latter can influence TKI resistance via caspase-6. Moreover, the miR-146a-5p/USP6/GLS1 axis can help to overcome TKI resistance without BCR-ABL involvement. TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; ULK1, unc-51-like autophagy-activating kinase 1; GCA, grancalcin; LZTR1, leucine zipper-like transcription regulator 1; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; GLS1, glutaminase 1. Figure 3 Table 1 The mechanisms of how the ubiquitin-proteasome system is involved in tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance. Table 1 Name Role in the ubiquitin-proteasome system Involvement in tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance Associated signaling pathways or molecules SKP2 E3 ligase Target the downstream signaling pathway of CML BCR-ABL/MYC/SKP2/p27 axis and PI3K/AKT/CREB/SKP2 axis CBL E3 ligase Directly target the ubiquitination of BCR-ABL PI3K-AKT and JAK-STAT signaling pathway FBXW7 E3 ligase Target leukemia-initiating cells (LIC) c-MYC and p53 CHIP E3 ligase Directly target the ubiquitination of BCR-ABL and target leukemic stem cells (LSCs) SIAH2 E3 ligase Target the downstream signaling pathway of CML and LSCs SIAH2/DYRK2/(c-Myc or p53) TRAF6 E3 ligase Target the downstream signaling pathway of CML GCA/TRAF6/ULK1 axis LZTR1 E3 ligase Target the downstream signaling pathway of CML MAPK signaling pathway LRSAM1 E3 ligase Directly target the ubiquitination of BCR-ABL USP6 DUBs Target the downstream signaling pathway of CML miR-146a-5p/USP6/GLS1 axis USP7 DUBs Directly target the deubiquitination of BCR-ABL and the downstream signaling pathway of CML BCR-ABL/USP7/PTEN axis and USP7/BCR-ABL/(STAT5 or LYN) axis USP9X DUBs Directly target the deubiquitination of BCR-ABL USP10 DUBs Indirectly target the ubiquitination of BCR-ABL USP10/SKP2/BCR-ABL axis USP14 DUBs Directly target the deubiquitination of BCR-ABL USP15 DUBs Target the downstream signaling pathway of CML STAT5A/miR-202-5p/USP15/caspase-6 axis USP25 DUBs Directly target the deubiquitination of BCR-ABL USP25/BCR-ABL/STAT5 USP47 DUBs Target the downstream signaling pathway of CML and protect the LSCs BCR-ABL-(RAS/REK or STAT5)-USP47-YB-1 axis UBE1 E1 enzyme Target the downstream signaling pathway of CML p53 and p27 Bortezomib Proteasome inhibitors Inhibit CML growth and promote cell apoptosis NF-κB2, RB, and caspase-3/8/9 Carfilzomib Proteasome inhibitors Promote cell apoptosis ERK/ABI-1/2 Oprozomib Proteasome inhibitors Promote cell apoptosis Caspase-12 and ASK-JNK-BIM axis NAE1 NEDD8-activating enzyme Target the downstream signaling pathway of CML and LSCs p27 Notes: NF-κB2, noncanonical nuclear factor-kappa B subunit 2; ULK1, unc-51-like autophagy-activating kinase 1; GCA, grancalcin; LZTR1, leucine zipper-like transcription regulator 1; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; LRSAM1, leucine-rich repeat and sterile alpha motif containing-1; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; GLS1, glutaminase 1; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog; YB-1, Y-box binding protein 1; ABI-1/2, Abelson interacting protein 1 and 2; NAE1, NEDD8 activating enzyme E1 subunit 1.

Figure 3 The role of E3 ligase and deubiquitinases (DUBs) in TKI resistance. For the E3 ligase, CHIP, LRSAM1, and Casitas B-lineage lymphoma (CBL) can directly target the ubiquiti…
Figure 3 The role of E3 ligase and deubiquitinases (DUBs) in TKI resistance. For the E3 ligase, CHIP, LRSAM1, and Casitas B-lineage lymphoma (CBL) can directly target the ubiquitination of BCR-ABL and CBL can then affect TKI resistance via PI3K/AKT and JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Down-regulated FBXW7 can overcome TKI resistance by increasing the MYC protein expression and activating p53. On the contrary, low expression of SIAH2 inhibits the MYC expression by up-regulating DYRK2 to overcome TKI resistance. SKP2 can be regulated by EMIL, MYC, and PI3K/AKT/CREB axis and affect TKI resistance by negative control of p27. Besides, the GCA/TRAF6/ULK1 and LZTR1/RAS/MAPK axis can also help to confront TKI resistance. For the DUBs, USP9X, USP7, and USP25 can directly deubiquitinate BCR-ABL and USP10 can indirectly deubiquitinate BCR-ABL via SKP2. BCR-ABL can affect USP47 through RAS/ERK and STAT5 signaling pathways and further positively regulate Y-box binding protein 1 (YB-1). Also, BCR-ABL/STAT5/miR-202-5P axis can regulate USP16 and the latter can influence TKI resistance via caspase-6. Moreover, the miR-146a-5p/USP6/GLS1 axis can help to overcome TKI resistance without BCR-ABL involvement. TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; ULK1, unc-51-like autophagy-activating kinase 1; GCA, grancalcin; LZTR1, leucine zipper-like transcription regulator 1; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; GLS1, glutaminase 1. Figure 3

Table 1
The mechanisms of how the ubiquitin-proteasome system is involved in tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance.
Notes: NF-κB2, noncanonical nuclear factor-kappa B subunit 2; ULK1, unc-51-like autophagy-activating kinase 1; GCA, grancalcin; LZTR1, leucine zipper-like transcription regulator 1; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; LRSAM1, leucine-rich repeat and sterile alpha motif containing-1; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; GLS1, glutaminase 1; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog; YB-1, Y-box binding protein 1; ABI-1/2, Abelson interacting protein 1 and 2; NAE1, NEDD8 activating enzyme E1 subunit 1.

NameRole in the ubiquitin-proteasome systemInvolvement in tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistanceAssociated signaling pathways or molecules
SKP2E3 ligaseTarget the downstream signaling pathway of CMLBCR-ABL/MYC/SKP2/p27 axis and PI3K/AKT/CREB/SKP2 axis
CBLE3 ligaseDirectly target the ubiquitination of BCR-ABLPI3K-AKT and JAK-STAT signaling pathway
FBXW7E3 ligaseTarget leukemia-initiating cells (LIC)c-MYC and p53
CHIPE3 ligaseDirectly target the ubiquitination of BCR-ABL and target leukemic stem cells (LSCs)
SIAH2E3 ligaseTarget the downstream signaling pathway of CML and LSCsSIAH2/DYRK2/(c-Myc or p53)
TRAF6E3 ligaseTarget the downstream signaling pathway of CMLGCA/TRAF6/ULK1 axis
LZTR1E3 ligaseTarget the downstream signaling pathway of CMLMAPK signaling pathway
LRSAM1E3 ligaseDirectly target the ubiquitination of BCR-ABL
USP6DUBsTarget the downstream signaling pathway of CMLmiR-146a-5p/USP6/GLS1 axis
USP7DUBsDirectly target the deubiquitination of BCR-ABL and the downstream signaling pathway of CMLBCR-ABL/USP7/PTEN axis and USP7/BCR-ABL/(STAT5 or LYN) axis
USP9XDUBsDirectly target the deubiquitination of BCR-ABL
USP10DUBsIndirectly target the ubiquitination of BCR-ABLUSP10/SKP2/BCR-ABL axis
USP14DUBsDirectly target the deubiquitination of BCR-ABL
USP15DUBsTarget the downstream signaling pathway of CMLSTAT5A/miR-202-5p/USP15/caspase-6 axis
USP25DUBsDirectly target the deubiquitination of BCR-ABLUSP25/BCR-ABL/STAT5
USP47DUBsTarget the downstream signaling pathway of CML and protect the LSCsBCR-ABL-(RAS/REK or STAT5)-USP47-YB-1 axis
UBE1E1 enzymeTarget the downstream signaling pathway of CMLp53 and p27
BortezomibProteasome inhibitorsInhibit CML growth and promote cell apoptosisNF-κB2, RB, and caspase-3/8/9
CarfilzomibProteasome inhibitorsPromote cell apoptosisERK/ABI-1/2
OprozomibProteasome inhibitorsPromote cell apoptosisCaspase-12 and ASK-JNK-BIM axis
NAE1NEDD8-activating enzymeTarget the downstream signaling pathway of CML and LSCsp27

DUBs

USP6

MicroRNAs in exosomes that are derived from mesenchymal stem cells are involved in the treatment of many diseases. Studies have shown that a large amount of miR-146a-5p in human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes is associated with ischemic stroke, ovarian cancer, and acute leukemia. 135 Wen's team confirmed that miR-146a-5p plays an important role in the treatment of TKI resistance in CML patients by regulating the expression of USP6. USP6 is highly expressed in bone marrow samples of patients with CML and is associated with poor prognosis. Compared with imatinib-sensitive patients, USP6 was significantly up-regulated in TKI-resistant patients. MiR-146a-5p derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells can inhibit the high expression of USP6, leading to the enhancement of the ubiquitination of glutaminase 1, and the USP6 substrate, followed finally by the promotion of apoptosis of K562-R cells induced by imatinib mesylate. Therefore, the miR-146a-5p/USP6/glutaminase 1 signal may be a new therapeutic target for further investigation for CML patients with TKI resistance. 136

USP7

USP7 plays an increasingly important role in hematological malignant tumors, especially CML. 137 , 138 Pandolfi et al reported that USP7 can mediate the de-ubiquitination of tumor suppressor phosphatase and tensin homolog and enhance its nuclear exclusion. BCR-ABL enhances the preceding process by interacting with and phosphorylating USP7 through amino acid residues on USP7. In contrast, the promyelocytic leukemia gene can inhibit the de-ubiquitination of phosphatase and tensin homolog by USP7. Therefore, the reverse regulation mechanism of BCR-ABL/promyelocytic leukemia gene on USP7-mediated de-ubiquitination of phosphatase and tensin homolog may be a novel treatment of CML. 139

Moreover, through the screening of DUBS, Mao's team found that USP7 prevented the polyubiquitin and degradation of BCR-ABL, as well as enhanced the phosphorylation of its downstream molecules, such as STAT5 and LYN. The antimalarial artesunate also promoted the degradation of BCR-ABL and induced apoptosis of CML cells by inhibiting the interaction between USP7 and BCR-ABL, making it a possible useful target for CML therapy. 140

USP9X

USP9X is highly expressed in many kinds of tumors and plays the role of oncogenes. However, a few studies have suggested that USP9X has roles in hematological tumors. 141 , 142 USP9X was found to inhibit cell death by inhibiting the ubiquitin degradation of myeloid cell leukemia-1 thus promoting disease progression. Myeloid cell leukemia-1 was expressed in abnormally high levels in CML, which is related to chemotherapy resistance and disease recurrence. 143 WP1130, an inhibitor of the deubiquitin enzyme USP9X, enhanced the ubiquitin degradation of BCR-ABL, resulting in its accumulation in aggresomes, and down-regulated myeloid cell leukemia-1 to promote the apoptosis of imatinib-sensitive and drug-resistant CML cells. These results further suggest that USP9X is a promising new treatment option for CML. 144

USP10

USP10 functions in cancers by regulating different substrates (androgen receptor, p53, SIRT6, AMPK, and Flt3). 145 , 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 , 150 Liu et al found that primary CML cells overexpressed USP10 and SKP2. USP10 mediates the de-ubiquitination and stability of SKP2, while the latter can positively modulate the expression of BCR-ABL by regulating its K63-associated ubiquitination and activation. Furthermore, the inhibition of USP10 can inhibit the growth of imatinib-sensitive and -resistant CML cells, primary CML cells, and transplanted tumors in nude mice, which process depends on the functional state of SKP2. Therefore, USP10/SKP2/BCR-ABL signal axis plays an important role in the occurrence and development of CML and may be another promising new therapeutic target for patients with TKI resistance. 151

USP14/UCHL15

Based on the key regulatory role of DUBs in cellular protein degradation, DUB inhibitors are considered attractive anticancer agents. Nickel pyrithione (NiPT) is an effective inhibitor of the 19S proteasome-related deubiquitinases (UCHL5 and USP14) but does not affect the 20S proteasome. 152 Liu et al showed that NiPT induced apoptosis of BCR-ABL-WT and BCR-ABL-T315I cells and inhibited the growth of xenografts derived from these two cells in nude mice. NiPT reduces the protein expression level of BCR-ABL by inhibiting BCR-ABL transcription and caspase-dependent cleavage. NiPT-induced UPS inhibition enhanced the activation of caspase in imatinib mesylate-resistant and -sensitive CML cells, while the activation of the latter leads to NiPT-induced down-regulation of BCR-ABL and CML cell death. These findings prove that NiPT can overcome imatinib mesylate resistance and has a high clinical transformation value. 153 Shi et al found that the expression of 20S proteasome polypeptidase and 19S proteasome deubiquitinase (USP14 and UCHL5) in primary cells of CML patients was higher than that of healthy people. B-AP15, an inhibitor of USP14 and UCHL5, can cooperate with imatinib to inhibit the growth of BCR-ABL-WT and BCR-ABL-T315I CML cell lines, CML xenograft tumor, and primary CML cells. 154 Meanwhile, in another study, they found that piperlongumine, isolated from piper longum L., can target USP14 and UCHL5 to inhibit the proteasome function of CML cells with or without T315I mutation, weaken the cell viability of CML cell line, induce apoptosis, and inhibit the growth of transplanted tumor. This study provides a theoretical basis for the application of piperlongumine in patients with CML resistance. 155

USP15

A large number of studies have shown that STAT5 plays a key role in the pathogenesis of CML, but its downstream target genes need further exploration. 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 Previously, STAT5A affected the expression of deubiquitylases USP15 by regulating microRNA, and mediated apoptosis and imatinib resistance of CML cells. STAT5A and miR-202-5p were also found to be highly expressed in CML patients, while USP15 was minimally expressed. STAT5A activates the transcription of miR-202-5p by binding to the promoter of miR-202 and up-regulates miR-202-5p, while the latter down-regulates the expression of USP15 by targeting its 3′-UTR. Deletion of USP15 leads to the increased ubiquitination of caspase-6 and thus decreases its protein expression, which in turn inhibits CML cell apoptosis and promotes TKI resistance. More importantly, the STAT5A/miR-202-5p/USP15/caspase-6 signal axis can be blocked by pimozide, promoting the apoptosis of CML cells in vivo and in vitro . Therefore, targeting this signal axis may become a new therapeutic strategy for TKI-resistant CML patients. 160

USP25

The degradation of fusion gene products depends on the quality control mechanism of proteins, while the high expression of BCR-ABL in CML cells indicates impairment of its normal degradation. Thorough research on the anti-degradation of BCR-ABL found that the deubiquitylases, USP25, inhibited the ubiquitination of BCR-ABL, thus increasing its protein level. Additionally, the deletion of USP25 induced the degradation of BCR-ABL and inhibited its downstream STAT5-related signal transduction, as well as the proliferation of Ph-positive leukemic cells. During these processes, the effect of USP25 inhibitors was not affected by TKI, making USP25 an additional target for patients with TKI resistance. 161

USP47

Studies have confirmed that USP47 plays an important role in cancers such as gastric cancer, medulloblastoma, and colorectal cancer, but its functions in CML are yet to be established. 162 , 163 , 164 Wu et al reported that USP47 is overexpressed in CML, and its knockdown or using the USP47 inhibitor P22077 inhibited the proliferation of imatinib-sensitive or -resistant CML cells and reduced the weight of the transplanted tumor. The knockout of USP47 or using P22077 also significantly impaired BCR-ABL and BCR-ABL T315I -induced CML in mice and reduced the number of CML stem/progenitor cells. In-depth mechanism studies have shown that BCR-ABL up-regulates the expression of USP47 through RAS/extracellular signal-regulated kinase and STAT5 signaling pathways. USP47 also binds to downstream Y-box binding protein 1 and protects it from proteasome degradation, making it conducive for DNA damage repair to occur in CML cells. In conclusion, USP47 is a promising target to overcome TKI resistance and eradicate leukemic stem cells/progenitor cells in CML. 165

E1 and E2

The specific substrate degradation function of E3 ubiquitin ligase is indifferent from the role of E1 ubiquitin-activating enzyme and E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Although at present, the data on E3 ubiquitin ligase are much more than that of E1 and E2 enzymes, the latter two are still crucial in CML. It may be effective in inhibiting the E1 and E2 enzymes to block the increased ubiquitin in leukemia.

PYR-4 and NSC624206 are two compounds with the ability to inhibit the E1 ubiquitin-activating enzyme UBE1 by blocking the formation of ubiquitin-thioester bond, and then inhibit the ubiquitination of p53 and p27. 166 , 167 The transcriptional activities and related signaling pathways of p53 and p27 play an important role in the occurrence, development, and maintenance of leukemic stem cells. 168 , 169

A research team identified recurrent mutations of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2A for the first time, through large-scale parallel sequencing analysis of 10 blast crisis samples and corresponding autologous chronic phase controls. The mutations were specific through further analysis and in vitro studies, with an incidence of 16.7% in progression, and were associated with myeloid differentiation disorders in CML. 170

The above evidence suggests that targeting E1 and E2 enzymes will be a potential therapeutic strategy for CML but warrants further evidence.

Proteasome inhibitors

At present, research has confirmed that the combination of TKIs and proteasome inhibitors can effectively synergize. Iris et al found that compared with using TKI alone, treating BCR-ABL plus acute lymphocytic leukemia with proteasome inhibitors bortezomib and ixazomib alone or in combination with TKI was more effective in reducing the viability of leukemia cell lines. The specific data are as follows: the cell viability after bortezomib treatment is 1.26% ± 0.46%, the cell viability after bortezomib combined with TKI treatment is 1.57% ± 0.7%, and the cell viability after dasatinib treatment alone is 40.58% ± 2.6%, which proves that TKI combined with proteasome inhibitor treatment has a great killing effect on BCR-ABL plus leukemia cells. 171 In CML, proteasome inhibitors can attack resistant or non-resistant CML cells and promote cell apoptosis. At the same time, many studies have also confirmed that the combination of proteasome inhibitors and TKI treatment has a more significant killing effect on CML cells, proving that proteasome inhibitors have the potential to change the treatment status of patients.

Bortezomib

Bortezomib, an inhibitor of 20S proteasome, is responsible for the degradation of a variety of intracellular proteins and shows significant activity in patients with multiple myeloma. 172 , 173 Recent studies have shown that bortezomib also has a certain tumor-toxic effect on CML. Roger et al showed that bortezomib can inhibit the growth of BCR-ABL-expressing cells and promote apoptosis by inactivating noncanonical nuclear factor-kappa B subunit 2 and reducing the phosphorylation of RB. At the same time, bortezomib can induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of imatinib-resistant CML cells. 174 Holyoake et al found that bortezomib can target primitive CML cells and induce CD34 + CML cell apoptosis at a clinically achievable concentration. Bortezomib alone or in combination with dasatinib can kill CML cells. For cell lines with BCR-ABL mutation, bortezomib can also effectively inhibit their proteasome activity and induce apoptosis. 175 Wang's team studied the effect of bortezomib in combination with sphingosine kinase 1 inhibitor SKI in CML cell lines. The results suggest that the combination of two drugs can increase the caspase-3 cleavage and apoptosis of drug-resistant or non-drug-resistant CML cells. Mechanism studies have found that increased apoptosis is related to the down-regulation of BCR-ABL and myeloid cell leukemia-1 and the significant decrease of sphingosine kinase 1 expression. 176 Another team's results focused on a combination of bortezomib and mitotic inhibitors, such as microtubule stabilizer paclitaxel and PLK1 inhibitor BI2536. Combination therapy showed a strong killing effect in TKI-sensitive or insensitive CML cells, effectively activating caspase-3, -8, and -9, and inhibiting the downstream signal pathway of BCR-ABL. 177 Although the effect of bortezomib is not selective and may lead to side effects such as bone marrow transplantation, the current experimental results still suggest that bortezomib may become another treatment option for patients with CML.

Carfilzomib

As a new generation of proteasome inhibitors, carfilzomib is an epoxyketone-based inhibitor that irreversibly binds to the proteasome. Currently, carfilzomib has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of recurrent/refractory multiple myeloma, showing better efficacy and fewer side effects than bortezomib. 178 , 179 Based on the effective killing effect of bortezomib on CML cells, Irvine et al studied the cytotoxicity of carfilzomib in CML. The results suggest that carfilzomib inhibits extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling and promotes the expression of Abelson interacting protein 1/2. It has a synergistic effect with imatinib and nilotinib and can effectively promote the apoptosis of primitive CML stem cells and imatinib-resistant CML cells. 180 The results of this study provide basic support for the use of carfilzomib in the treatment of CML patients.

Oprozomib

Oprozomib is a tripeptide analogue of carfilzomib, which is an oral bioavailable proteasome inhibitor. 181 In the preclinical model, oprozomib showed the same anti-tumor activity as carfilzomib. In patients with recurrent/refractory multiple myeloma, oprozomib showed good efficacy as a single drug or in combination with other drugs. 182 , 183 Wang's team conducted multidrug screening of bone marrow mononuclear cells from patients with CML and found that oprozomib was a candidate drug that could induce apoptosis in leukemic cells. In-depth mechanism studies have found that oprozomib can promote the up-regulation of endoplasmic reticulum chaperone protein, release calcium ions into the cytoplasm, activate calpain, and then cleave caspase-12. At the same time, it can also activate IRE1α phosphorylation and promote CML cell apoptosis through the ASK/c-Jun N-terminal kinase/BIM axis. 184 This study provides theoretical evidence for the clinical transformation of oprozomib to CML therapy.

Ubiquitin-like proteins

NEDD8

Protein neddylation is a post-translational modification similar to ubiquitination, which adds a ubiquitin-like neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 8 (NEDD8) to the target protein. Neddylation involves three enzymes: NEDD8-activating enzyme (NAE1), E2-conjugating enzyme (UBC12), and E3 ligases. 185 A large number of studies have shown that neddylation plays an important role in DNA damage, tumorigenesis, and drug resistance. 186 , 187 , 188

NAE1 inhibitor-MLN4924 has significant cytotoxic effects against several tumors, induces DNA damage in Ph + leukemia, and enhances its sensitivity to ABL kinase inhibitors. Clinical trials have been carried out in hematological malignant tumors such as acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphocytic leukemia, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. 69 , 189 In a study involving the overexpression of NAE1 in CML cells, the NAE1 inhibitor MLN4924 could inhibit the growth of CML cell lines and CML patient-derived CD34 + cells, induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in CML cells containing wild-type p53, regardless of their sensitivity to TKIs, and prolong the survival of CML mice and weaken the maintenance of leukemic stem cells. Further studies have found that MLN4924 can promote the nuclear accumulation of p27 kip1 in CML cell lines and primary cells while silencing the p27 kip1 weakens the anti-CML effect of MLN4924. Based on the above evidence, although more long-term research is needed, targeting neddylation may be a new therapeutic strategy for drug resistance in CML. 168

Other ubiquitin-like proteins

At present, there are no relevant research reports on the involvement of other ubiquitin-like proteins in CML resistance. However, there is considerable evidence to suggest that some ubiquitin-like proteins play an important role in CML. Interferon-stimulated gene 15 is a ubiquitin-like modifier, and its expression and binding to other proteins (ISGylation) are strongly increased under the stimulation of type 1 interferon (IFN). 190 UBP43 is an interferon-stimulated gene 15-specific isopeptidase whose expression is activated by IFN. Studies have shown that UBP43 deficiency increases resistance to BCR-ABL carcinogenic transformation, and this resistance to leukemia development depends on the type 1 IFN (IFN α/β) signaling in UBP43 deficient cells. 191

Development of PROTAC in CML

As discussed, various components of the UPS either resist or promote TKI resistance of CML in multiple ways. They include directly or indirectly targeting the ubiquitination process of related molecules, inhibiting or activating CML-related downstream signaling pathways, and affecting the functional status of leukemia stem cells. Therefore, many molecules have the potential to become new targets for CML therapy in the future, and their combination with TKI is expected to be highly efficacious. However, the clinical focus on TKI resistance is still to directly target BCR-ABL, leukemia “promoter”, and constantly improvise TKI. At present, the third-generation TKI drug olverembatinib has shown good efficacy in CML patients with or without T351I mutation, making it superior to nilotinib and dasatinib. 192

As a classic CML therapeutic drug, the principle of TKI is to inhibit the activity of tyrosine kinase and act as a BCR-ABL inhibitor. The better aim would be to design a drug to directly target the degradation of tyrosine kinase to eliminate the leukemia “promoter” BCR-ABL. Inspired by UPS, researchers designed the proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTAC) to use UPS to degrade proteins of interest (POI). The PROTAC molecule consists of three covalent bonds: a ligand used to bind the POI (POI ligand), another ligand to recognize E3 ligase (E3 ligand), and a linker that connects the two ligands. PROTAC recruits both the E3 ligase and POI to form an “E3-PROTAC-POI” ternary complex. A number of studies have investigated PROTAC on BCR-ABL ( Fig. 4 and Table 2 ). 66 , 193 , 194 Figure 4 Overview of the common PROTAC and PROTAC targeting BCR-ABL. (A) The common PROTAC contains three parts, a ligand used to bind the POI (POI ligand), another ligand to recognize E3 ligase (E3 ligand), and a linker that connects the two ligands. PROTAC recruits both the E3 ligase and POI to form an “E3-PROTAC-POI” ternary complex. (B) The photoswitchable PROTAC is based on the CRBN E3 ligand and 4C (linker). Being light-controlled, the trans-4C degrades BCR-ABL rapidly at 100 nM, while cis-4C loses its degradation function at 500 nm. UV irradiation for 1 h transformed trans-4C to cis-4C, which would otherwise take 4 h with white light irradiation. (C) SNIPER (IAP-based PROTACs) couple ABL inhibitors (imatinib, GNF-5, HG-7-85-01, dashatinib) with IAP ligands (MEBS, MV-1, LCL161 derivatives) and can achieve the degradation of BCR-ABL. PROTAC, proteolysis targeting chimeras; POI, protein of interest. Figure 4 Table 2 The basic composition of PROTAC target BCR-ABL. Table 2 Name E3 ligand POI ligand Reference The first PROTAC target BCR-ABL CRBN Bosutinib or dasatinib 195 GMB-475 VHL GNF-5 196 GMB-805 VHL ABL001 197 Azo-PROTACs CRBN Dasatinib 198 SIAIS178 VHL Dasatinib 200 P19P CRBN Ponatinib 199 P19AS CRBN Asciminib 199 SNIPER (ABL)-39 LCL161 derivative Dasatinib 201 SNIPER (ABL)-62 IAP ABL001 derivative 202 DAS-IAP LCL161 derivative Dasatinib 203 Note: POI, protein of interest.

Figure 4 Overview of the common PROTAC and PROTAC targeting BCR-ABL. (A) The common PROTAC contains three parts, a ligand used to bind the POI (POI ligand), another ligand to reco…
Figure 4 Overview of the common PROTAC and PROTAC targeting BCR-ABL. (A) The common PROTAC contains three parts, a ligand used to bind the POI (POI ligand), another ligand to recognize E3 ligase (E3 ligand), and a linker that connects the two ligands. PROTAC recruits both the E3 ligase and POI to form an “E3-PROTAC-POI” ternary complex. (B) The photoswitchable PROTAC is based on the CRBN E3 ligand and 4C (linker). Being light-controlled, the trans-4C degrades BCR-ABL rapidly at 100 nM, while cis-4C loses its degradation function at 500 nm. UV irradiation for 1 h transformed trans-4C to cis-4C, which would otherwise take 4 h with white light irradiation. (C) SNIPER (IAP-based PROTACs) couple ABL inhibitors (imatinib, GNF-5, HG-7-85-01, dashatinib) with IAP ligands (MEBS, MV-1, LCL161 derivatives) and can achieve the degradation of BCR-ABL. PROTAC, proteolysis targeting chimeras; POI, protein of interest. Figure 4

Table 2
The basic composition of PROTAC target BCR-ABL.
Note: POI, protein of interest.

NameE3 ligandPOI ligandReference
The first PROTAC target BCR-ABLCRBNBosutinib or dasatinib195
GMB-475VHLGNF-5196
GMB-805VHLABL001197
Azo-PROTACsCRBNDasatinib198
SIAIS178VHLDasatinib200
P19PCRBNPonatinib199
P19ASCRBNAsciminib199
SNIPER (ABL)-39LCL161 derivativeDasatinib201
SNIPER (ABL)-62IAPABL001 derivative202
DAS-IAPLCL161 derivativeDasatinib203

In 2016, Crew et al first designed the PROTAC that targeted BCR-ABL. The tested PROTACs used four different linkers to connect the BCR-ABL TKIs (imatinib, bosutinib, and dasatinib). The TKIs were bound to the c-ABL kinase domain to the known Von Hippel Lindau (VHL) E3 ubiquitin ligand or Cereblon (CRBN) E3 ubiquitin ligand. Among these targets, only bosutinib-CRBN and bosutinib-CRBN can degrade BCR-ABL, and the latter has stronger leukemia cell selectivity. These results show that warhead and E3 ligase are very important for the design of PROTAC targeting BCR-ABL. 195

In 2019, Crew's team used structurally modified GNF-5 to combine with VHL binding elements, taking advantage of the former's function of improving cell permeability and affinity, to optimize the structure of PROTAC and synthesize GMB-475. GMB-475 mediates the degradation of wild-type and mutant BCR-ABL (T315I and G250E) and enhances the sensitivity of TKI-resistant cells to imatinib. GMB-475 also promoted the apoptosis of CML CD34 + cells without affecting normal CD34 + cells. 196 Next, Crew found that there was a complementary synergistic effect by combining imatinib and GMB-475, which could significantly reduce TKI resistance, drug toxicity, and adverse reactions.

In a follow-up study, a scaffold hopping approach was applied to enhance the activity of the GMB-475 and obtain a new PROTAC (GMB-805). As GMB-805 eliminated the need to optimize linkers to access more efficient degraders, its degradation induction ability was over 10 times higher than that of GMB-475 and demonstrated strong anti-leukemia cell proliferation abilities. The above studies reveal that PROTAC targeting BCR-ABL has great prospects as a therapeutic for CML patients and CML TKI-resistant patients when combined with TKI and PROTAC in the future. 197

In addition to Crew's research, there are also other scientists concerned about BCR-ABL PROTAC. Jiang and his colleagues designed a light-controlled photoswitchable azobenzene-proteolysis targeting chimeras (Azo-PROTACs). Among many Azo-PROTACs, the Azo-PROTAC-4C based on the CRBN E3 ligand and 4C (linker) exhibited the best activity in degrading the BCR-ABL fusion protein. Being light-controlled, the trans-4C degrades BCR-ABL rapidly at 100 nM, while cis-4C loses its degradation function at 500 nm. UV irradiation for 1 h transformed trans-4C to cis-4C, which would otherwise take 4 h with white light irradiation. Azo-PROTAC not only targets BCR-ABL degradation but also achieves artificial control, creating broader prospects with the advancement of precision medicine. 198 Rao and the team further paired ponatinib and asciminib with CRBN to produce BCR-ABL PROTAC (P19P and P19AS). Both combinations lowered the level of BCR-ABL in K562 cells and BaF3 cells carrying the T315I mutation. Moreover, P19P had less cytotoxicity compared with ponatinib. 199 In another report, dasatinib was paired with VHL-1, thus designing a new PROTAC (SIAIS178). The results suggest that SIAIS178 can degrade wild-type BCR-ABL and various mutants of BCR-ABL (T315I, F317V, F317L, G250E, and V299L), and significantly inhibit the growth of K562 cells in vitro and in vivo . 200

In addition to VHL and CRBN, the E3 ubiquitin enzyme IAP was also designed as PROTAC to target BCR-ABL degradation. It is called the specific and non-genetic inhibitors of apoptosis protein (IAP)-dependent protein erasers (SNIPER). In 2017, Naito designed a series of IAP-based PROTACs by coupling ABL inhibitors (imatinib, GNF-5, HG-7-85-01, dashatinib) with IAP ligands (MEBS, MV-1, LCL161 derivatives). Among these combinations, SNIPER (ABL)-39 effectively degraded BCR-ABL, inhibited its downstream signaling pathway, and damaged the proliferation of CML cells. 201 Subsequently, Naito designed SNIPER (ABL)-62 and DAS-IAP, which were better than SNIPER (ABL)-39 in all aspects. 202 , 203 Based on these data, IAP-based PROTACs demonstrate a greater development potential as a treatment.

At present, there is no clinical trial of PROTAC in the treatment of CML, but in other tumors, PROTAC has shown good characteristics in preclinical and clinical settings. 204 Some problems and obstacles need to be addressed before PROTAC can be used more widely in the treatment of patients. Although the data received so far are limited, similar to TKI, a small number of tumor patients are resistant to protein degradants. It has been found that shared and drug-specific modulator networks, including the constitutive photomorphogenesis 9 signalosome and the substrate receptors exchange factor CAND1 can induce resistance to protein degradation agents by affecting the activity of E3 ubiquitin ligase. 205 Another study has shown that the loss of related ubiquitin proteasome system components can cause cancer cells to become resistant to degraders. 206 In addition, Shen et al found that acquired resistance to VHL and CRBN-based BET-PROTAC is mainly due to genome changes that damage the core components of the related E3 ligase complex. 207 To sum up, the existing evidence suggests that PROTAC-related drug resistance is mainly due to changes in UPS, and target protein-related drug resistance has not been reported. However, due to the limited published basic research and the lack of long-term follow-up data for patients treated with protein degradants, the current conclusions may not be accurate, and more experimental and clinical data are needed to explore the mechanism of PROTAC resistance in the future.

Conclusions and prospects

The advent of TKI targeting BCR-ABL has greatly changed the treatment of CML and prolonged the survival and quality of life of patients with CML. The research and development of TKI are ongoing and the new generation of TKIs has a wider range of indications. These TKIs induce deeper and faster remission and have fewer adverse reactions, but drug resistance is still a primary problem seriously affecting the prognosis of CML patients. In addition to developing novel BCR-ABL inhibitors, new targets are being explored. In view of the important biological functions of UPS in the human body, it appears as a key agent to help overcome CML drug resistance. The components of UPS can be roughly divided into two categories: “protein degraders” (E1, E2, and E3 ubiquitinases) and “protein degradation antagonizors” (DUBs and proteasome inhibitors). Although mediating opposite physiological activities, their roles in CML TKI resistance are diverse and not directly antagonistic due to targeting different substrates or signaling pathways. Firstly, they directly or indirectly target the degradation of BCR-ABL (CHIP, LRSAM1, c-CBL, SKP2, USP9X, USP7, USP10, USP25) and can combine with TKIs to help treat CML. Secondly, they activate or inhibit the downstream signaling pathway of CML (FBXW7, TRAF6, leucine zipper-like transcription regulator 1, c-CBL, USP47, USP6, USP15, bortezomib, carfilzomib, oprozomib), so that they can help to eliminate CML cells which evade the killing effect of TKIs. Finally, they affect the state of leukemia stem cells (CHIP, SIAH2, bortezomib, carfilzomib) and avoid recurrence and drug resistance of CML caused by LSCs. The presence of LSCs is one of the main reasons for TKI resistance in CML patients and has been a research hotspot in recent years. At present, many studies have confirmed that many signaling pathways can regulate CML LSCs, but their specific regulatory mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. Because there is limited research about UPS involved in CML LSCs, there is still great room for exploring the role of UPS in them. Except for the traditional UPS components, PROTAC technology has become a novel strategy for new drug research and development. PROTAC, a protein degrader targeting BCR-ABL, is presumed to surpass the protein inhibitor TKI. So far, 18 preclinical studies related to PROTAC in the treatment of cancer are underway, of which 7 are related to hematological malignancies. The seven clinical trials are all in phase I; five of them target Bruton tyrosine kinase and concentrate on B cell malignancies; one focuses on B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, targeting interleukin 1 receptor associated kinase 4; and the other one focuses on eligible blood cancers, targeting signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 ( Table 3 ). 204 Although there is no clinical and preclinical data on PROTAC in the treatment of CML, it is undeniable that this technology will develop in the next few years, similar to the CAR-T cell technology, be fully explored for applications in TKI-resistant CML patients, and change the existing strategy of CML treatment. The innate immune response plays a key role in inhibiting the development of cancer, and the activation of the interferon type 1 (IFN-α/β) signal pathway is a key component of it. 208 , 209 , 210 Before the advent of TKI, IFN-α was the standard treatment choice for patients with CML who did not meet the criteria for bone marrow transplantation. However, due to many side effects and a low initial reaction rate, IFN-α was gradually replaced by TKI. In recent years, the problem of drug resistance of TKI has been perplexing some CML patients, but some studies have found that after stopping the administration of IFN, there are still a considerable number of patients with IFN responses who can be completely relieved. 211 , 212 At the same time, research has found that the killing effect of IFN on leukemic stem cells is stronger than that of imatinib. 213 Therefore, it is very important to explore the molecular mechanism of the clinical response of IFN and clarify the role of immune response in the treatment of CML. In the above text, we described that IFN can enhance the endogenous IFN response by inhibiting Ubp43 or other negative regulators of IFN signal, and can be used in combination with imatinib as a useful drug for the treatment of BCR-ABL-induced leukemia. 191 This study shows that UPS can participate in the occurrence and development of CML and drug resistance of TKI by affecting immune response. Although the evidence is limited, it is also a potential research direction. Moreover, the continuous development of TKIs revealed promising results, while more studies confirm the many components of UPS as CML therapeutic targets. This paper briefly describes the mechanism of TKI drug resistance, describes the basic composition of UPS and the process of protein ubiquitination, and focuses on the research progress of UPS-related molecules on CML TKI resistance, in order to provide reference for the rational development and design of new CML therapeutic targets. Table 3 Clinical trials of PROTAC in hematological malignancies. Table 3 PROTAC E3 ligand Target Disease NCT number NX-2127 CRBN BTK B cell malignancies NCT04830137 NX-5948 CRBN BTK B cell malignancies NCT05131022 BGB-16673 CRBN BTK B cell malignancies NCT05006716 BGB-16673 CRBN BTK B cell malignancies NCT05294731 HSK29116 CRBN BTK B cell malignancies NCT04861779 KT-413 IRAK4 B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma NCT05233033 KT-333 CRBN STAT3 Blood cancers and solid tumors NCT05225584 Notes: STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; BTK, Bruton tyrosine kinase; IRAK4, interleukin 1 receptor associated kinase 4; PROTAC, proteolysis targeting chimeras.

Table 3
Clinical trials of PROTAC in hematological malignancies.
Notes: STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; BTK, Bruton tyrosine kinase; IRAK4, interleukin 1 receptor associated kinase 4; PROTAC, proteolysis targeting chimeras.

PROTACE3 ligandTargetDiseaseNCT number
NX-2127CRBNBTKB cell malignanciesNCT04830137
NX-5948CRBNBTKB cell malignanciesNCT05131022
BGB-16673CRBNBTKB cell malignanciesNCT05006716
BGB-16673CRBNBTKB cell malignanciesNCT05294731
HSK29116CRBNBTKB cell malignanciesNCT04861779
KT-413IRAK4B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomaNCT05233033
KT-333CRBNSTAT3Blood cancers and solid tumorsNCT05225584

Author contributions

The first draft of the manuscript was written by XL, WL, and YZ. YS and LX critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

1 Kalidas M. Kantarjian H. Talpaz M. Chronic myelogenous leukemia JAMA 286 8 2001 895 898 11509034 10.1001/jama.286.8.895

2 Sawyers C.L. Chronic myeloid leukemia N Engl J Med 340 17 1999 1330 1340 10219069 10.1056/NEJM199904293401706

3 Druker B.J. Talpaz M. Resta D.J. Efficacy and safety of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in chronic myeloid leukemia N Engl J Med 344 14 2001 1031 1037 11287972 10.1056/NEJM200104053441401

4 Lin Q. Mao L. Shao L. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic myeloid leukemia, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017 Front Oncol 10 2020 580759 33384954 10.3389/fonc.2020.580759 PMC7770240

5 Greuber E.K. Smith-Pearson P. Wang J. Pendergast A.M. Role of ABL family kinases in cancer: from leukaemia to solid tumours Nat Rev Cancer 13 8 2013 559 571 23842646 10.1038/nrc3563 PMC3935732

6 Deininger M.W. Goldman J.M. Melo J.V. The molecular biology of chronic myeloid leukemia Blood 96 10 2000 3343 3356 11071626

7 Berman E. How I treat chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia Blood 139 21 2022 3138 3147 34529784 10.1182/blood.2021011722

8 Yeung D.T. Shanmuganathan N. Hughes T.P. Asciminib: a new therapeutic option in chronic-phase CML with treatment failure Blood 139 24 2022 3474 3479 35468180 10.1182/blood.2021014689

9 Braun T.P. Eide C.A. Druker B.J. Response and resistance to BCR-ABL1-targeted therapies Cancer Cell 37 4 2020 530 542 32289275 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.006 PMC7722523

10 Drula R. Iluta S. Gulei Exploiting the ubiquitin system in myeloid malignancies. From basic research to drug discovery in MDS and AML Blood Rev 56 2022 100971 35595613 10.1016/j.blre.2022.100971

11 Obeng E.A. Carlson L.M. Gutman D.M. Harrington W.J. Lee K.P. Boise L.H. Proteasome inhibitors induce a terminal unfolded protein response in multiple myeloma cells Blood 107 12 2006 4907 4916 16507771 10.1182/blood-2005-08-3531 PMC1895817

12 Reff M.J. Shillingburg A. Shah B. Elder C. Prescott H. Kennerly-Shah J. Front-line use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: practice considerations J Oncol Pharm Pract 26 1 2020 156 174 31354102 10.1177/1078155219864640

13 Jabbour E. Kantarjian H. Chronic myeloid leukemia: 2018 update on diagnosis, therapy and monitoring Am J Hematol 93 3 2018 442 459 29411417 10.1002/ajh.25011

14 Kantarjian H.M. Shah N.P. Cortes J.E. Dasatinib or imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: 2-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION) Blood 119 5 2012 1123 1129 22160483 10.1182/blood-2011-08-376087 PMC4916556

15 Osman A.E.G. Deininger M.W. Chronic myeloid leukemia: modern therapies, current challenges, and future directions Blood Rev 49 2021 100825 33773846 10.1016/j.blre.2021.100825 PMC8563059

16 Meenakshi Sundaram D.N. Jiang X. Brandwein J.M. Valencia-Serna J. Remant K.C. Uludağ H. Current outlook on drug resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and potential therapeutic options Drug Discov Today 24 7 2019 1355 1369 31102734 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.05.007

17 Dhillon S. Olverembatinib: first approval Drugs 82 4 2022 469 475 35195876 10.1007/s40265-022-01680-9

18 Qian J. Shi D. Li Z. Updated safety and efficacy results of phase 1 study of olverembatinib (HQP1351), a novel third-generation BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), in patients with TKI-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) Blood 138 suppl 1 2021 311 313

19 Qian J. Shi D. Li Z. Updated results of pivotal phase 2 trials of olverembatinib (HQP1351) in patients (pts) with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-resistant BCR-ABL1 T315I -mutated chronic- and accelerated-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP and CML-AP) Blood 138 2021 3598

20 Chen J. Wang F. Fang J. Dynamic evolution of ponatinib-resistant mutations in BCR-ABL1-positive leukaemias revealed by next-generation sequencing Br J Haematol 191 5 2020 e113 e116 33460055 10.1111/bjh.17068

21 Tang C. Schafranek L. Watkins D.B. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia cell lines: investigating resistance pathways Leuk Lymphoma 52 11 2011 2139 2147 21718141 10.3109/10428194.2011.591013

22 Stetka J. Gursky J. Liñan Velasquez J. Role of DNA damage response in suppressing malignant progression of chronic myeloid leukemia and polycythemia vera: impact of different oncogenes Cancers (Basel) 12 4 2020 E903 10.3390/cancers12040903 PMC7226398 32272770

23 Popp H.D. Kohl V. Naumann N. DNA damage and DNA damage response in chronic myeloid leukemia Int J Mol Sci 21 4 2020 1177 32053969 10.3390/ijms21041177 PMC7072846

24 Xue M. Zeng Z. Wang Q. Mutational profiles during the progression of chronic myeloid leukemia Blood 138 suppl 1 2021 3596

25 Ma D. Liu P. Wang P. Zhou Z. Fang Q. Wang J. PKC-β/Alox5 axis activation promotes Bcr-Abl-independent TKI-resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia J Cell Physiol 236 9 2021 6312 6327 33561320 10.1002/jcp.30301

26 Alves R. Gonçalves A.C. Rutella S. Resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia - from molecular mechanisms to clinical relevance Cancers (Basel) 13 19 2021 4820 34638304 10.3390/cancers13194820 PMC8508378

27 Wagle M. Eiring A.M. Wongchenko M. A role for FOXO1 in BCR-ABL1-independent tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia Leukemia 30 7 2016 1493 1501 27044711 10.1038/leu.2016.51 PMC4935980

28 Sweet K. Atallah E. Radich J. Second treatment free remission after combination therapy with ruxolitinib plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) Blood 138 suppl 1 2021 2555

29 Hamilton A. Helgason G.V. Schemionek M. Chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells are not dependent on Bcr-Abl kinase activity for their survival Blood 119 6 2012 1501 1510 22184410 10.1182/blood-2010-12-326843 PMC3286213

30 Zhao C. Blum J. Chen A. Loss of beta-catenin impairs the renewal of normal and CML stem cells in vivo Cancer Cell 12 6 2007 528 541 18068630 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.11.003 PMC2262869

31 Arrigoni E. Del Re M. Galimberti S. Concise review: chronic myeloid leukemia: stem cell niche and response to pharmacologic treatment Stem Cells Transl Med 7 3 2018 305 314 29418079 10.1002/sctm.17-0175 PMC5827745

32 Naka K. Hoshii T. Muraguchi T. TGF-beta-FOXO signalling maintains leukaemia-initiating cells in chronic myeloid leukaemia Nature 463 7281 2010 676 680 20130650 10.1038/nature08734

33 Li L. Wang L. Li L. Activation of p53 by SIRT1 inhibition enhances elimination of CML leukemia stem cells in combination with imatinib Cancer Cell 21 2 2012 266 281 22340598 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.12.020 PMC3285436

34 Abraham S.A. Hopcroft L.E. Carrick E. Dual targeting of p53 and c-MYC selectively eliminates leukaemic stem cells Nature 534 7607 2016 341 346 27281222 10.1038/nature18288 PMC4913876

35 Liu C. Zou W. Nie D. Loss of PRMT7 reprograms glycine metabolism to selectively eradicate leukemia stem cells in CML Cell Metab 34 6 2022 818 835.e7 35508169 10.1016/j.cmet.2022.04.004

36 Jin B. Wang C. Li J. Anthelmintic niclosamide disrupts the interplay of p65 and FOXM1/β-catenin and eradicates leukemia stem cells in chronic myelogenous leukemia Clin Cancer Res 23 2017 789 803 27492973 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0226

37 Naka K. Jomen Y. Ishihara K. Dipeptide species regulate p38MAPK-Smad3 signalling to maintain chronic myelogenous leukaemia stem cells Nat Commun 6 2015 8039 26289811 10.1038/ncomms9039 PMC4560789

38 Mohd M. Ye H. Winters Amanda C. Lysosomal acid lipase a (LIPA) modulates leukemia stem cell (LSC) response to venetoclax/TKI combination therapy in blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia Blood 138 S1 2021 630 10.3324/haematol.2023.284716 PMC11694110 38934082

39 Nair R.R. Tolentino J. Hazlehurst L.A. The bone marrow microenvironment as a sanctuary for minimal residual disease in CML Biochem Pharmacol 80 5 2010 602 612 20382130 10.1016/j.bcp.2010.04.003 PMC3285111

40 Agarwal P. Li H. Choi K. TNF-α-induced alterations in stromal progenitors enhance leukemic stem cell growth via CXCR2 signaling Cell Rep 36 2 2021 109386 34260914 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109386 PMC8292106

41 Senft D. Qi J. Ronai Z.A. Ubiquitin ligases in oncogenic transformation and cancer therapy Nat Rev Cancer 18 2 2018 69 88 29242641 10.1038/nrc.2017.105 PMC6054770

42 Yau R. Rape M. The increasing complexity of the ubiquitin code Nat Cell Biol 18 6 2016 579 586 27230526 10.1038/ncb3358

43 Mukhopadhyay D. Riezman H. Proteasome-independent functions of ubiquitin in endocytosis and signaling Science 315 5809 2007 201 205 17218518 10.1126/science.1127085

44 Komander D. Rape M. The ubiquitin code Annu Rev Biochem 81 2012 203 229 22524316 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060310-170328

45 Behrends C. Harper J.W. Constructing and decoding unconventional ubiquitin chains Nat Struct Mol Biol 18 5 2011 520 528 21540891 10.1038/nsmb.2066

46 Schulman B.A. Harper J.W. Ubiquitin-like protein activation by E1 enzymes: the apex for downstream signalling pathways Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10 5 2009 319 331 19352404 10.1038/nrm2673 PMC2712597

47 Dikic I. Wakatsuki S. Walters K.J. Ubiquitin-binding domains - from structures to functions Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10 10 2009 659 671 19773779 10.1038/nrm2767 PMC7359374

48 Hormaechea-Agulla D. Kim Y. Song M.S. Song S.J. New insights into the role of E2s in the pathogenesis of diseases: lessons learned from UBE2O Mol Cells 41 3 2018 168 178 29562734 10.14348/molcells.2018.0008 PMC5881090

49 Ye Y. Rape M. Building ubiquitin chains: E2 enzymes at work Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10 11 2009 755 764 19851334 10.1038/nrm2780 PMC3107738

50 van Wijk S.J. Timmers H.T. The family of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s): deciding between life and death of proteins FASEB J 24 4 2010 981 993 19940261 10.1096/fj.09-136259

51 Zheng N. Shabek N. Ubiquitin ligases: structure, function, and regulation Annu Rev Biochem 86 2017 129 157 28375744 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014922

52 Spratt D.E. Walden H. Shaw G.S. RBR E3 ubiquitin ligases: new structures, new insights, new questions Biochem J 458 3 2014 421 437 24576094 10.1042/BJ20140006 PMC3940038

53 Pla-Prats C. Thomä N.H. Quality control of protein complex assembly by the ubiquitin-proteasome system Trends Cell Biol 32 8 2022 696 706 35300891 10.1016/j.tcb.2022.02.005

54 Lange S.M. Armstrong L.A. Kulathu Y. Deubiquitinases: from mechanisms to their inhibition by small molecules Mol Cell 82 1 2022 15 29 34813758 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.10.027

55 van der Veen A.G. Ploegh H.L. Ubiquitin-like proteins Annu Rev Biochem 81 2012 323 357 22404627 10.1146/annurev-biochem-093010-153308

56 Hwang J.T. Lee A. Kho C. Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins in cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, and heart diseases Int J Mol Sci 23 9 2022 5053 35563444 10.3390/ijms23095053 PMC9105348

57 Cappadocia L. Lima C.D. Ubiquitin-like protein conjugation: structures, chemistry, and mechanism Chem Rev 118 3 2018 889 918 28234446 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00737 PMC5815371

58 Swatek K.N. Komander D. Ubiquitin modifications Cell Res 26 4 2016 399 422 27012465 10.1038/cr.2016.39 PMC4822133

59 Harrigan J.A. Jacq X. Martin N.M. Jackson S.P. Deubiquitylating enzymes and drug discovery: emerging opportunities Nat Rev Drug Discov 17 1 2018 57 78 28959952 10.1038/nrd.2017.152 PMC7097658

60 Bhattacharjee S. Nandi S. DNA damage response and cancer therapeutics through the lens of the Fanconi Anemia DNA repair pathway Cell Commun Signal 15 1 2017 41 29017571 10.1186/s12964-017-0195-9 PMC5635482

61 Martín-Vicente M. Medrano L.M. Resino S. García-Sastre A. Martínez I. TRIM25 in the regulation of the antiviral innate immunity Front Immunol 8 2017 1187 29018447 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01187 PMC5614919

62 Kattah M.G. Malynn B.A. Ma A. Ubiquitin-modifying enzymes and regulation of the inflammasome J Mol Biol 429 22 2017 3471 3485 29031697 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.10.001 PMC5675782

63 do Patrocinio A.B. Rodrigues V. Guidi Magalhães L. P53: stability from the ubiquitin-proteasome system and specific 26S proteasome inhibitors ACS Omega 7 5 2022 3836 3843 35155881 10.1021/acsomega.1c04726 PMC8829948

64 Inui N. Sakai S. Kitagawa M. Molecular pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis, with focus on pathways related to TGF-β and the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway Int J Mol Sci 22 11 2021 6107 34198949 10.3390/ijms22116107 PMC8201174

65 Liu J. Chen H. Kaniskan H.Ü. TF-PROTACs enable targeted degradation of transcription factors J Am Chem Soc 143 23 2021 8902 8910 34100597 10.1021/jacs.1c03852 PMC8225582

66 Li X. Pu W. Zheng Q. Ai M. Chen S. Peng Y. Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) in cancer therapy Mol Cancer 21 1 2022 99 35410300 10.1186/s12943-021-01434-3 PMC8996410

67 Huang X. Dixit V.M. Drugging the undruggables: exploring the ubiquitin system for drug development Cell Res 26 4 2016 484 498 27002218 10.1038/cr.2016.31 PMC4822129

68 Manasanch E.E. Orlowski R.Z. Proteasome inhibitors in cancer therapy Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14 7 2017 417 433 28117417 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.206 PMC5828026

69 Soucy T.A. Smith P.G. Milhollen M.A. An inhibitor of NEDD8-activating enzyme as a new approach to treat cancer Nature 458 7239 2009 732 736 19360080 10.1038/nature07884

70 Bjorklund C.C. Kang J. Amatangelo M. Iberdomide (CC-220) is a potent cereblon E3 ligase modulator with antitumor and immunostimulatory activities in lenalidomide- and pomalidomide-resistant multiple myeloma cells with dysregulated CRBN Leukemia 34 4 2020 1197 1201 31719682 10.1038/s41375-019-0620-8 PMC7214241

71 Shah J. Usmani S. Stadtmauer E.A. Oprozomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 19 9 2019 570 578.e1 31326409 10.1016/j.clml.2019.05.017

72 Vogl D.T. Martin T.G. Vij R. Phase I/II study of the novel proteasome inhibitor delanzomib (CEP-18770) for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma Leuk Lymphoma 58 8 2017 1872 1879 28140719 10.1080/10428194.2016.1263842

73 Hnit S.S. Xie C. Yao M. p27(Kip1) signaling: transcriptional and post-translational regulation Int J Biochem Cell Biol 68 2015 9 14 26279144 10.1016/j.biocel.2015.08.005

74 Wu T. Gu X. Cui H. Emerging roles of SKP 2 in cancer drug resistance Cells 10 5 2021 1147 34068643 10.3390/cells10051147 PMC8150781

75 Huang T. Yang L. Wang G. Inhibition of Skp2 sensitizes lung cancer cells to paclitaxel Onco Targets Ther 10 2017 439 446 28176922 10.2147/OTT.S125789 PMC5261849

76 Koga H. Harada M. Ohtsubo M. Troglitazone induces p27Kip1-associated cell-cycle arrest through down-regulating Skp2 in human hepatoma cells Hepatology 37 5 2003 1086 1096 12717389 10.1053/jhep.2003.50186

77 Masuda T.A. Inoue H. Sonoda H. Clinical and biological significance of S-phase kinase-associated protein 2 (Skp2) gene expression in gastric carcinoma: modulation of malignant phenotype by Skp2 overexpression, possibly via p27 proteolysis Cancer Res 62 13 2002 3819 3825 12097295

78 Agarwal A. Bumm T.G.P. Corbin A.S. Absence of SKP 2 expression attenuates BCR-ABL-induced myeloproliferative disease Blood 112 5 2008 1960 1970 18559973 10.1182/blood-2007-09-113860 PMC2518897

79 Chen J.Y. Wang M.C. Hung W.C. Bcr-Abl-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Emi1 to stabilize Skp2 protein via inhibition of ubiquitination in chronic myeloid leukemia cells J Cell Physiol 226 2 2011 407 413 20717963 10.1002/jcp.22346

80 Bretones G. Acosta J.C. Caraballo J.M. SKP 2 oncogene is a direct MYC target gene and MYC down-regulates p27KIP1 through SKP 2 in human leukemia cells J Biol Chem 286 11 2011 9815 9825 21245140 10.1074/jbc.M110.165977 PMC3059036

81 Gómez-Casares M.T. García-Alegria E. López-Jorge C.E. MYC antagonizes the differentiation induced by imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia cells through downregulation of p27(KIP1.) Oncogene 32 17 2013 2239 2246 22710719 10.1038/onc.2012.246

82 Tomiatti V. Istvánffy R. Pietschmann E. Cks1 is a critical regulator of hematopoietic stem cell quiescence and cycling, operating upstream of Cdk inhibitors Oncogene 34 33 2015 4347 4357 25417705 10.1038/onc.2014.364

83 Iskandarani A. Bhat A.A. Siveen K.S. Bortezomib-mediated downregulation of S-phase kinase protein-2 (SKP 2 ) causes apoptotic cell death in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells J Transl Med 14 2016 69 26956626 10.1186/s12967-016-0823-y PMC4784454

84 Chen X. Huang Z. Wu W. Xia R. Inhibition of Skp2 sensitizes chronic myeloid leukemia cells to imatinib Cancer Manag Res 12 2020 4777 4787 32606967 10.2147/CMAR.S253367 PMC7319929

85 Sargin B. Choudhary C. Crosetto N. Flt3-dependent transformation by inactivating c-Cbl mutations in AML Blood 110 3 2007 1004 1012 17446348 10.1182/blood-2007-01-066076

86 Grand F.H. Hidalgo-Curtis C.E. Ernst T. Frequent CBL mutations associated with 11q acquired uniparental disomy in myeloproliferative neoplasms Blood 113 24 2009 6182 6192 19387008 10.1182/blood-2008-12-194548

87 Caligiuri M.A. Briesewitz R. Yu J. Novel c-CBL and CBL-b ubiquitin ligase mutations in human acute myeloid leukemia Blood 110 3 2007 1022 1024 17475912 10.1182/blood-2006-12-061176 PMC1924768

88 Dunbar A.J. Gondek L.P. O'Keefe C.L. 250K single nucleotide polymorphism array karyotyping identifies acquired uniparental disomy and homozygous mutations, including novel missense substitutions of c-Cbl, in myeloid malignancies Cancer Res 68 24 2008 10349 10357 19074904 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2754 PMC2668538

89 Sanada M. Suzuki T. Shih L.Y. Gain-of-function of mutated C-CBL tumour suppressor in myeloid neoplasms Nature 460 7257 2009 904 908 19620960 10.1038/nature08240

90 Papaemmanuil E. Gerstung M. Malcovati L. O-001 Clinical and biological implications of gene mutations in MDS Leuk Res 37 2013 S9

91 Haferlach T. Nagata Y. Grossmann V. Landscape of genetic lesions in 944 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes Leukemia 28 2 2014 241 247 24220272 10.1038/leu.2013.336 PMC3918868

92 Papaemmanuil E. Gerstung M. Bullinger L. Genomic classification and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia N Engl J Med 374 23 2016 2209 2221 27276561 10.1056/NEJMoa1516192 PMC4979995

93 Kohlmann A. Grossmann V. Klein H.U. Next-generation sequencing technology reveals a characteristic pattern of molecular mutations in 72.8% of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia by detecting frequent alterations in TET2, CBL, RAS, and RUNX1 J Clin Oncol 28 24 2010 3858 3865 20644105 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.1361

94 Loh M.L. Sakai D.S. Flotho C. Mutations in CBL occur frequently in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia Blood 114 9 2009 1859 1863 19571318 10.1182/blood-2009-01-198416 PMC2738571

95 Stieglitz E. Taylor-Weiner A.N. Chang T.Y. The genomic landscape of juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia Nat Genet 47 11 2015 1326 1333 26457647 10.1038/ng.3400 PMC4626387

96 Toffalini F. Kallin A. Vandenberghe P. The fusion proteins TEL-PDGFRβ and FIP1L1-PDGFRα escape ubiquitination and degradation Haematologica 94 8 2009 1085 1093 19644140 10.3324/haematol.2008.001149 PMC2719031

97 Hu J. Liu Y.F. Wu C.F. Long-term efficacy and safety of all-trans retinoic acid/arsenic trioxide-based therapy in newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106 9 2009 3342 3347 19225113 10.1073/pnas.0813280106 PMC2651325

98 Yin T. Wu Y.L. Sun H.P. Combined effects of As 4 S 4 and imatinib on chronic myeloid leukemia cells and BCR-ABL oncoprotein Blood 104 13 2004 4219 4225 15339852 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1433

99 Mao J.H. Sun X.Y. Liu J.X. As 4 S 4 targets RING-type E3 ligase c-CBL to induce degradation of BCR-ABL in chronic myelogenous leukemia Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107 50 2010 21683 21688 21118980 10.1073/pnas.1016311108 PMC3003020

100 Nakata Y. Ueda T. Nagamachi A. Acquired expression of Cbl Q367P in mice induces dysplastic myelopoiesis mimicking chronic myelomonocytic leukemia Blood 129 15 2017 2148 2160 28209720 10.1182/blood-2016-06-724658 PMC5391621

101 Belizaire R. Koochaki S.H.J. Udeshi N.D. CBL mutations drive PI3K/AKT signaling via increased interaction with LYN and PIK3R1 Blood 137 16 2021 2209 2220 33512474 10.1182/blood.2020006528 PMC8063090

102 Gioia R. Leroy C. Drullion C. Quantitative phosphoproteomics revealed interplay between Syk and Lyn in the resistance to nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukemia cells Blood 118 8 2011 2211 2221 21730355 10.1182/blood-2010-10-313692

103 Gioia R. Trégoat C. Dumas P.Y. CBL controls a tyrosine kinase network involving AXL, SYK and LYN in nilotinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukaemia J Pathol 237 1 2015 14 24 25965880 10.1002/path.4561

104 Lv K. Jiang J. Donaghy R. CBL family E3 ubiquitin ligases control JAK2 ubiquitination and stability in hematopoietic stem cells and myeloid malignancies Genes Dev 31 10 2017 1007 1023 28611190 10.1101/gad.297135.117 PMC5495118

105 Kourtis N. Moubarak R.S. Aranda-Orgilles B. FBXW7 modulates cellular stress response and metastatic potential through HSF 1 post-translational modification Nat Cell Biol 17 3 2015 322 332 25720964 10.1038/ncb3121 PMC4401662

106 Ye M. Zhang Y. Zhang X. Targeting FBW 7 as a strategy to overcome resistance to targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer Cancer Res 77 13 2017 3527 3539 28522751 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-3470

107 Close V. Close W. Kugler S.J. FBXW7 mutations reduce binding of NOTCH1, leading to cleaved NOTCH1 accumulation and target gene activation in CLL Blood 133 8 2019 830 839 30510140 10.1182/blood-2018-09-874529

108 Cui D. Xiong X. Shu J. Dai X. Sun Y. Zhao Y. FBXW7 confers radiation survival by targeting p53 for degradation Cell Rep 30 2 2020 497 509.e4 31940492 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.032

109 Matsuoka S. Oike Y. Onoyama I. Fbxw7 acts as a critical fail-safe against premature loss of hematopoietic stem cells and development of T-ALL Genes Dev 22 8 2008 986 991 18367647 10.1101/gad.1621808 PMC2335330

110 Thompson B.J. Jankovic V. Gao J. Control of hematopoietic stem cell quiescence by the E3 ubiquitin ligase Fbw7 J Exp Med 205 6 2008 1395 1408 18474632 10.1084/jem.20080277 PMC2413036

111 Laurenti E. Wilson A. Trumpp A. Myc's other life: stem cells and beyond Curr Opin Cell Biol 21 6 2009 844 854 19836223 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.09.006

112 Reavie L. Della Gatta G. Crusio K. Regulation of hematopoietic stem cell differentiation by a single ubiquitin ligase-substrate complex Nat Immunol 11 3 2010 207 215 20081848 10.1038/ni.1839 PMC2825759

113 Reavie L. Buckley S.M. Loizou E. Regulation of c-Myc ubiquitination controls chronic myelogenous leukemia initiation and progression Cancer Cell 23 3 2013 362 375 23518350 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.01.025 PMC3609428

114 Takeishi S. Matsumoto A. Onoyama I. Naka K. Hirao A. Nakayama K.I. Ablation of Fbxw7 eliminates leukemia-initiating cells by preventing quiescence Cancer Cell 23 3 2013 347 361 23518349 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.01.026

115 Ballinger C.A. Connell P. Wu Y. Identification of CHIP, a novel tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein that interacts with heat shock proteins and negatively regulates chaperone functions Mol Cell Biol 19 6 1999 4535 4545 10330192 10.1128/mcb.19.6.4535 PMC104411

116 McDonough H. Patterson C. CHIP: a link between the chaperone and proteasome systems Cell Stress Chaperones 8 4 2003 303 308 15115282 10.1379/1466-1268(2003)008<0303:calbtc>2.0.co;2 PMC514901

117 Murata S. Chiba T. Tanaka K. CHIP: a quality-control E3 ligase collaborating with molecular chaperones Int J Biochem Cell Biol 35 5 2003 572 578 12672450 10.1016/s1357-2725(02)00394-1

118 Tsukahara F. Maru Y. Bag1 directly routes immature BCR-ABL for proteasomal degradation Blood 116 18 2010 3582 3592 20675402 10.1182/blood-2009-10-249623

119 Lei H. Jin J. Liu M. Chk1 inhibitors overcome imatinib resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia cells Leuk Res 64 2018 17 23 29149649 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.11.007

120 Ru Y. Wang Q. Liu X. The chimeric ubiquitin ligase SH2-U-box inhibits the growth of imatinib-sensitive and resistant CML by targeting the native and T315I-mutant BCR-ABL Sci Rep 6 2016 28352 27329306 10.1038/srep28352 PMC4916441

121 Li K. Li J. Ye M. Jin X. The role of Siah2 in tumorigenesis and cancer therapy Gene 2021 146028 34687788 10.1016/j.gene.2021.146028

122 Huang J. Lu Z. Xiao Y. Inhibition of Siah2 ubiquitin ligase by vitamin K3 attenuates chronic myeloid leukemia chemo-resistance in hypoxic microenvironment Med Sci Monit 24 2018 727 735 29400343 10.12659/MSM.908553 PMC5810368

123 Park C.S. Lewis A.H. Chen T.J. A KLF4-DYRK2-mediated pathway regulating self-renewal in CML stem cells Blood 134 22 2019 1960 1972 31515251 10.1182/blood.2018875922 PMC6887114

124 Deng T. Hu B. Wang X. TRAF 6 autophagic degradation by avibirnavirus VP3 inhibits antiviral innate immunity via blocking NFKB/NF-κB activation Autophagy 18 12 2022 2781 2798 35266845 10.1080/15548627.2022.2047384 PMC9673932

125 Zhang J.L. Du B.B. Zhang D.H. OTUB1 alleviates NASH through inhibition of the TRAF6-ASK1 signaling pathways Hepatology 75 5 2022 1218 1234 34591986 10.1002/hep.32179

126 Liu J. Li S. Fei X. Increased alveolar epithelial TRAF 6 via autophagy-dependent TRIM37 degradation mediates particulate matter-induced lung metastasis Autophagy 18 5 2022 971 989 34524943 10.1080/15548627.2021.1965421 PMC9196782

127 Muto T. Guillamot M. Yeung J. TRAF 6 functions as a tumor suppressor in myeloid malignancies by directly targeting MYC oncogenic activity Cell Stem Cell 29 2 2022 298 314.e9 35045331 10.1016/j.stem.2021.12.007 PMC8822959

128 Han S.H. Korm S. Han Y.G. GCA links TRAF6-ULK1-dependent autophagy activation in resistant chronic myeloid leukemia Autophagy 15 12 2019 2076 2090 30929559 10.1080/15548627.2019.1596492 PMC6844495

129 Ali M.S. Panuzzo C. Calabrese C. The giant HECT E3 ubiquitin ligase HERC1 is aberrantly expressed in myeloid related disorders and it is a novel BCR-ABL1 binding partner Cancers (Basel) 13 2 2021 341 33477751 10.3390/cancers13020341 PMC7832311

130 Ali M.S. Magnati S. Panuzzo C. The downregulation of both giant HERCs, HERC1 and HERC2 , is an unambiguous feature of chronic myeloid leukemia, and HERC1 levels are associated with leukemic cell differentiation J Clin Med 11 2 2022 324 35054018 10.3390/jcm11020324 PMC8778248

131 Bigenzahn J.W. Collu G.M. Kartnig F. LZTR1 is a regulator of RAS ubiquitination and signaling Science 362 6419 2018 1171 1177 30442766 10.1126/science.aap8210 PMC6794158

132 Kim S.Y. Kim H.J. Kim H.J. Kim C.H. Non-thermal plasma induces antileukemic effect through mTOR ubiquitination Cells 9 3 2020 E595 10.3390/cells9030595 PMC7140413 32131492

133 Yin Z. Huang G. Gu C. Liu Y. Yang J. Fei J. Discovery of berberine that targetedly induces autophagic degradation of both BCR-ABL and BCR-ABL T315I through recruiting LRSAM1 for overcoming imatinib resistance Clin Cancer Res 26 15 2020 4040 4053 32098768 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2460

134 Paul T. Roy R. Sarkar R.D. Sinha S. Biswas N. H 2 O 2 mediated FLIP and XIAP down-regulation involves increased ITCH expression and ERK-Akt crosstalk in imatinib resistant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia cell line K562 Free Radic Biol Med 166 2021 265 276 33631302 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.02.024

135 Qiu L. Wang J. Chen M. Chen F. Tu W. Exosomal microRNA-146a derived from mesenchymal stem cells increases the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to docetaxel and taxane via a LAMC2-mediated PI3K/Akt axis Int J Mol Med 46 2 2020 609 620 32626953 10.3892/ijmm.2020.4634 PMC7307828

136 Chen X. Chen Y. Zhang M. HucMSC exosomes promoted imatinib-induced apoptosis in K562-R cells via a miR-145a-5p/USP6/GLS1 axis Cell Death Dis 13 1 2022 92 35091542 10.1038/s41419-022-04531-3 PMC8799639

137 Liu M. Zhang Y. Wu Y. IKZF 1 selectively enhances homologous recombination repair by interacting with CtIP and USP7 in multiple myeloma Int J Biol Sci 18 6 2022 2515 2526 35414773 10.7150/ijbs.70960 PMC8990476

138 Maat H. Atsma T.J. Hogeling S.M. The USP7-TRIM27 axis mediates non-canonical PRC1.1 function and is a druggable target in leukemia iScience 24 5 2021 102435 34113809 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102435 PMC8169803

139 Morotti A. Panuzzo C. Crivellaro S. BCR-ABL disrupts PTEN nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling through phosphorylation-dependent activation of HAUSP Leukemia 28 6 2014 1326 1333 24317448 10.1038/leu.2013.370

140 Jiang S. Wang X. He Y. Suppression of USP7 induces BCR-ABL degradation and chronic myelogenous leukemia cell apoptosis Cell Death Dis 12 5 2021 456 33963175 10.1038/s41419-021-03732-6 PMC8105359

141 Jie X. Fong W.P. Zhou R. USP9X-mediated KDM4C deubiquitination promotes lung cancer radioresistance by epigenetically inducing TGF-β2 transcription Cell Death Differ 28 7 2021 2095 2111 33558705 10.1038/s41418-021-00740-z PMC8257660

142 Guan T. Yang X. Liang H. Deubiquitinating enzyme USP9X regulates metastasis and chemoresistance in triple-negative breast cancer by stabilizing Snail1 J Cell Physiol 237 7 2022 2992 3000 35506169 10.1002/jcp.30763

143 Schwickart M. Huang X. Lill J.R. Deubiquitinase USP9X stabilizes MCL1 and promotes tumour cell survival Nature 463 7277 2010 103 107 20023629 10.1038/nature08646

144 Sun H. Kapuria V. Peterson L.F. Bcr-Abl ubiquitination and Usp9x inhibition block kinase signaling and promote CML cell apoptosis Blood 117 11 2011 3151 3162 21248063 10.1182/blood-2010-03-276477

145 Draker R. Sarcinella E. Cheung P. USP10 deubiquitylates the histone variant H2A.Z and both are required for androgen receptor-mediated gene activation Nucleic Acids Res 39 9 2011 3529 3542 21245042 10.1093/nar/gkq1352 PMC3089478

146 Faus H. Meyer H.A. Huber M. Bahr I. Haendler B. The ubiquitin-specific protease USP10 modulates androgen receptor function Mol Cell Endocrinol 245 1–2 2005 138 146 16368182 10.1016/j.mce.2005.11.011

147 Yuan J. Luo K. Zhang L. Cheville J.C. Lou Z. USP10 regulates p53 localization and stability by deubiquitinating p53 Cell 140 3 2010 384 396 20096447 10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.032 PMC2820153

148 Lin Z. Yang H. Tan C. USP10 antagonizes c-Myc transcriptional activation through SIRT6 stabilization to suppress tumor formation Cell Rep 5 6 2013 1639 1649 24332849 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.029 PMC4007576

149 Deng M. Yang X. Qin B. Deubiquitination and activation of AMPK by USP10 Mol Cell 61 4 2016 614 624 26876938 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.010 PMC4836875

150 Weisberg E.L. Schauer N.J. Yang J. Inhibition of USP10 induces degradation of oncogenic FLT3 Nat Chem Biol 13 12 2017 1207 1215 28967922 10.1038/nchembio.2486 PMC6314479

151 Liao Y. Liu N. Xia X. USP10 modulates the SKP 2 /Bcr-Abl axis via stabilizing SKP 2 in chronic myeloid leukemia Cell Discov 5 2019 24 31044085 10.1038/s41421-019-0092-z PMC6488640

152 Zhao C. Chen X. Zang D. A novel nickel complex works as a proteasomal deubiquitinase inhibitor for cancer therapy Oncogene 35 2016 5916 5927 27086925 10.1038/onc.2016.114 PMC5497060

153 Lan X. Zhao C. Chen X. Nickel pyrithione induces apoptosis in chronic myeloid leukemia cells resistant to imatinib via both Bcr/Abl-dependent and Bcr/Abl-independent mechanisms J Hematol Oncol 9 1 2016 129 27884201 10.1186/s13045-016-0359-x PMC5123219

154 Jiang L. He Q. Chen X. Inhibition of proteasomal deubiquitinases USP14 and UCHL5 overcomes tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in chronic myeloid leukaemia Clin Transl Med 12 9 2022 e1038 10.1002/ctm2.1038 PMC9460481 36082692

155 Lan X. Hu M. Jiang L. Piperlongumine overcomes imatinib resistance by inducing proteasome inhibition in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells J Ethnopharmacol 301 2023 115815 36220508 10.1016/j.jep.2022.115815

156 Steelman L.S. Pohnert S.C. Shelton J.G. Franklin R.A. Bertrand F.E. McCubrey J.A. JAK/STAT, Raf/MEK/ERK, PI3K/Akt and BCR-ABL in cell cycle progression and leukemogenesis Leukemia 18 2 2004 189 218 14737178 10.1038/sj.leu.2403241

157 Basham B. Sathe M. Grein J. In vivo identification of novel STAT5 target genes Nucleic Acids Res 36 11 2008 3802 3818 18492722 10.1093/nar/gkn271 PMC2441806

158 Turhan A.G. STAT5 as a CML target: STATinib therapies? Blood 117 12 2011 3252 3253 21436078 10.1182/blood-2011-01-332569

159 Haetscher N. Feuermann Y. Wingert S. STAT5-regulated microRNA-193b controls haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell expansion by modulating cytokine receptor signalling Nat Commun 6 2015 8928 26603207 10.1038/ncomms9928 PMC4674773

160 Nie Z.Y. Yao M. Yang Z. De-regulated STAT5A/miR-202-5p/USP15/caspase-6 regulatory axis suppresses CML cell apoptosis and contributes to imatinib resistance J Exp Clin Cancer Res 39 1 2020 17 31952546 10.1186/s13046-019-1502-7 PMC6969434

161 Shibata N. Ohoka N. Tsuji G. Deubiquitylase USP25 prevents degradation of BCR-ABL protein and ensures proliferation of Ph-positive leukemia cells Oncogene 39 19 2020 3867 3878 32203161 10.1038/s41388-020-1253-0

162 Yan S. Yue Y. Wang J. LINC00668 promotes tumorigenesis and progression through sponging miR-188-5p and regulating USP47 in colorectal cancer Eur J Pharmacol 858 2019 172464 31233752 10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172464

163 Bufalieri F. Infante P. Bernardi F. ERAP1 promotes Hedgehog-dependent tumorigenesis by controlling USP47-mediated degradation of βTrCP Nat Commun 10 1 2019 3304 31341163 10.1038/s41467-019-11093-0 PMC6656771

164 Yu L. Dong L. Wang Y. Reversible regulation of SATB1 ubiquitination by USP47 and SMURF 2 mediates colon cancer cell proliferation and tumor progression Cancer Lett 448 2019 40 51 30742943 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.01.039

165 Lei H. Xu H.Z. Shan H.Z. Targeting USP47 overcomes tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance and eradicates leukemia stem/progenitor cells in chronic myelogenous leukemia Nat Commun 12 1 2021 51 33397955 10.1038/s41467-020-20259-0 PMC7782553

166 Yang Y. Kitagaki J. Dai R.M. Inhibitors of ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1), a new class of potential cancer therapeutics Cancer Res 67 19 2007 9472 9481 17909057 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0568

167 Ungermannova D. Parker S.J. Nasveschuk C.G. Identification and mechanistic studies of a novel ubiquitin E1 inhibitor J Biomol Screen 17 4 2012 421 434 22274912 10.1177/1087057111433843 PMC3339042

168 Liu C. Nie D. Li J. Antitumor effects of blocking protein neddylation in T315I-BCR-ABL leukemia cells and leukemia stem cells Cancer Res 78 6 2018 1522 1536 29321163 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1733

169 Yang S. Zhu X.N. Zhang H.L. ANP32B-mediated repression of p53 contributes to maintenance of normal and CML stem cells Blood 138 24 2021 2485 2498 34359074 10.1182/blood.2020010400 PMC8678996

170 Magistroni V. Mauri M. D'Aliberti D. De novo UBE2A mutations are recurrently acquired during chronic myeloid leukemia progression and interfere with myeloid differentiation pathways Haematologica 104 9 2019 1789 1797 30819912 10.3324/haematol.2017.179937 PMC6717574

171 Maletzke S. Salimi A. Vieri M. Combined inhibition of BCR-ABL1 and the proteasome as a potential novel therapeutic approach in BCR-ABL positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia PLoS One 17 10 2022 e0268352 10.1371/journal.pone.0268352 PMC9531817 36194587

172 Stein R. Smith M.R. Chen S. Zalath M. Goldenberg D.M. Combining milatuzumab with bortezomib, doxorubicin, or dexamethasone improves responses in multiple myeloma cell lines Clin Cancer Res 15 8 2009 2808 2817 19351768 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1953 PMC2681251

173 Vogl D.T. Stadtmauer E.A. Richardson P.G. Impact of prior therapies on the relative efficacy of bortezomib compared with dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma Br J Haematol 147 4 2009 531 534 19725827 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07875.x

174 Albero M.P. Vaquer J.M. Andreu E.J. Bortezomib decreases Rb phosphorylation and induces caspase-dependent apoptosis in imatinib-sensitive and-resistant Bcr-Abl1-expressing cells Oncogene 29 22 2010 3276 3286 20305692 10.1038/onc.2010.81

175 Heaney N.B. Pellicano F. Zhang B. Bortezomib induces apoptosis in primitive chronic myeloid leukemia cells including LTC-IC and NOD/SCID repopulating cells Blood 115 11 2010 2241 2250 20068223 10.1182/blood-2008-06-164582 PMC2844011

176 Li Q.F. Yan J. Zhang K. Bortezomib and sphingosine kinase inhibitor interact synergistically to induces apoptosis in BCR/ABl + cells sensitive and resistant to STI571 through down-regulation MCL-1 Biochem Biophys Res Commun 405 1 2011 31 36 21195056 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.12.111

177 Bucur O. Stancu A.L. Goganau I. Combination of bortezomib and mitotic inhibitors down-modulate Bcr-Abl and efficiently eliminates tyrosine-kinase inhibitor sensitive and resistant Bcr-Abl-positive leukemic cells PLoS One 8 10 2013 e77390 10.1371/journal.pone.0077390 PMC3796452 24155950

178 Vij R. Wang M. Kaufman J.L. An open-label, single-arm, phase 2 (PX-171-004) study of single-agent carfilzomib in bortezomib-naive patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma Blood 119 24 2012 5661 5670 22555973 10.1182/blood-2012-03-414359 PMC4123327

179 Katsnelson A. Next-generation proteasome inhibitor approved in multiple myeloma Nat Biotechnol 30 11 2012 1011 1012 23138275 10.1038/nbt1112-1011

180 Crawford L.J. Chan E.T. Aujay M. Synergistic effects of proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in imatinib-sensitive and-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia models Oncogenesis 3 3 2014 e90 24590311 10.1038/oncsis.2014.3 PMC3940921

181 Zhou H.J. Aujay M.A. Bennett M.K. Design and synthesis of an orally bioavailable and selective peptide epoxyketone proteasome inhibitor (PR-047) J Med Chem 52 9 2009 3028 3038 19348473 10.1021/jm801329v

182 Shah J.J. Stadtmauer E.A. Abonour R. Carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory myeloma Blood 126 20 2015 2284 2290 26384354 10.1182/blood-2015-05-643320 PMC4643003

183 Ghobrial Irene M. Savona Michael R. Ravi V. Final results from a multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation phase 1b/2 study of single-agent oprozomib in patients with hematologic malignancies Blood 128 22 2016 2110

184 Wang F. Wang X. Li N. Prolonged unfolded protein reaction is involved in the induction of chronic myeloid leukemia cell death upon oprozomib treatment Cancer Sci 112 1 2021 133 143 33067904 10.1111/cas.14696 PMC7780017

185 Duncan K. Schäfer G. Vava A. Parker M.I. Zerbini L.F. Targeting neddylation in cancer therapy Future Oncol 8 11 2012 1461 1470 23148618 10.2217/fon.12.131

186 Jiang Y. Jia L. Neddylation pathway as a novel anti-cancer target: mechanistic investigation and therapeutic implication Anticancer Agents Med Chem 15 9 2015 1127 1133 25742093 10.2174/1871520615666150305111257

187 Enchev R.I. Schulman B.A. Peter M. Protein neddylation: beyond cullin-RING ligases Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16 1 2015 30 44 25531226 10.1038/nrm3919 PMC5131867

188 Huang J. Zhou Y. Thomas G.S. NEDD8 inhibition overcomes CKS1B-induced drug resistance by upregulation of p21 in multiple myeloma Clin Cancer Res 21 24 2015 5532 5542 26156395 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0254 PMC4804624

189 Bahjat M. de Wilde G. van Dam T. The NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor MLN4924 induces DNA damage in Ph + leukemia and sensitizes for ABL kinase inhibitors Cell Cycle 18 18 2019 2307 2322 31349760 10.1080/15384101.2019.1646068 PMC6738521

190 Haas A.L. Ahrens P. Bright P.M. Ankel H. Interferon induces a 15-kilodalton protein exhibiting marked homology to ubiquitin J Biol Chem 262 23 1987 11315 11323 2440890

191 Yan M. Luo J.K. Ritchie K.J. Ubp43 regulates BCR-ABL leukemogenesis via the type 1 interferon receptor signaling Blood 110 1 2007 305 312 17374743 10.1182/blood-2006-07-033209 PMC1896118

192 Jiang Q. Li Z. Qin Y. Olverembatinib (HQP1351), a well-tolerated and effective tyrosine kinase inhibitor for patients with T315I-mutated chronic myeloid leukemia: results of an open-label, multicenter phase 1/2 trial J Hematol Oncol 15 1 2022 1 17 35982483 10.1186/s13045-022-01334-z PMC9389804

193 Békés M. Langley D.R. Crews C.M. PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue Nat Rev Drug Discov 21 3 2022 181 200 35042991 10.1038/s41573-021-00371-6 PMC8765495

194 Zhao L. Zhao J. Zhong K. Tong A. Jia D. Targeted protein degradation: mechanisms, strategies and application Signal Transduct Target Ther 7 1 2022 113 35379777 10.1038/s41392-022-00966-4 PMC8977435

195 Lai A.C. Toure M. Hellerschmied D. Modular PROTAC design for the degradation of oncogenic BCR-ABL Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 55 2 2016 807 810 26593377 10.1002/anie.201507634 PMC4733637

196 Burslem G.M. Schultz A.R. Bondeson D.P. Targeting BCR-ABL1 in chronic myeloid leukemia by PROTAC-mediated targeted protein degradation Cancer Res 79 18 2019 4744 4753 31311809 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-1236 PMC6893872

197 Burslem G.M. Bondeson D.P. Crews C.M. Scaffold hopping enables direct access to more potent PROTACs with in vivo activity Chem Commun (Camb) 56 50 2020 6890 6892 32519703 10.1039/d0cc02201b PMC7404552

198 Jin Y.H. Lu M.C. Wang Y. Azo-PROTAC: novel light-controlled small-molecule tool for protein knockdown J Med Chem 63 9 2020 4644 4654 32153174 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b02058

199 Yang Y. Gao H. Sun X. Global PROTAC toolbox for degrading BCR-ABL overcomes drug-resistant mutants and adverse effects J Med Chem 63 15 2020 8567 8583 32657579 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00967

200 Zhao Q. Ren C. Liu L. Discovery of SIAIS178 as an effective BCR-ABL degrader by recruiting von hippel-lindau (VHL) E3 ubiquitin ligase J Med Chem 62 20 2019 9281 9298 31539241 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01264

201 Shibata N. Miyamoto N. Nagai K. Development of protein degradation inducers of oncogenic BCR-ABL protein by conjugation of ABL kinase inhibitors and IAP ligands Cancer Sci 108 8 2017 1657 1666 28556300 10.1111/cas.13284 PMC5543464

202 Shimokawa K. Shibata N. Sameshima T. Targeting the allosteric site of oncoprotein BCR-ABL as an alternative strategy for effective target protein degradation ACS Med Chem Lett 8 10 2017 1042 1047 29057048 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.7b00247 PMC5641955

203 Shibata N. Shimokawa K. Nagai K. Pharmacological difference between degrader and inhibitor against oncogenic BCR-ABL kinase Sci Rep 8 1 2018 13549 30202081 10.1038/s41598-018-31913-5 PMC6131351

204 Chirnomas D. Hornberger K.R. Crews C.M. Protein degraders enter the clinic - a new approach to cancer therapy Nat Rev Clin Oncol 20 4 2023 265 278 36781982 10.1038/s41571-023-00736-3 PMC11698446

205 Mayor-Ruiz C. Jaeger M.G. Bauer S. Plasticity of the cullin-RING ligase repertoire shapes sensitivity to ligand-induced protein degradation Mol Cell 75 4 2019 849 858.e8 31442425 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.07.013

206 Ottis P. Palladino C. Thienger P. Cellular resistance mechanisms to targeted protein degradation converge toward impairment of the engaged ubiquitin transfer pathway ACS Chem Biol 14 10 2019 2215 2223 31553577 10.1021/acschembio.9b00525

207 Zhang L. Riley-Gillis B. Vijay P. Shen Y. Acquired resistance to BET-PROTACs (proteolysis-targeting chimeras) caused by genomic alterations in core components of E3 ligase complexes Mol Cancer Ther 18 7 2019 1302 1311 31064868 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-18-1129

208 Dunn G.P. Old L.J. Schreiber R.D. The immunobiology of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting Immunity 21 2 2004 137 148 15308095 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.07.017

209 Biron C.A. Interferons alpha and beta as immune regulators: a new look Immunity 14 6 2001 661 664 11420036 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00154-6

210 Chin E.N. Sulpizio A. Lairson L.L. Targeting STING to promote antitumor immunity Trends Cell Biol 33 3 2023 189 203 35931610 10.1016/j.tcb.2022.06.010

211 Bonifazi F. de Vivo A. Rosti G. Chronic myeloid leukemia and interferon-alpha: a study of complete cytogenetic responders Blood 98 10 2001 3074 3081 11698293 10.1182/blood.v98.10.3074

212 Kantarjian H.M. O'Brien S. Cortes J.E. Complete cytogenetic and molecular responses to interferon-alpha-based therapy for chronic myelogenous leukemia are associated with excellent long-term prognosis Cancer 97 4 2003 1033 1041 12569603 10.1002/cncr.11223

213 Angstreich G.R. Matsui W. Huff C.A. Effects of imatinib and interferon on primitive chronic myeloid leukaemia progenitors Br J Haematol 130 3 2005 373 381 16042686 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05606.x

Peer review under responsibility of Chongqing Medical University.

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты