Hepato-gastroenterology · 2014
Optimal selection of methods for mini-invasive treatment of extrahepatic bile duct stones.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Feng Wen Ming, Bao Ying, Tang Cheng Wu, Fei Mao Yun, Guo Hui Hui, Tao Yu Long, Xue Tao, Gong Hui, Cui Ge, Wang Yao
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aims to identify the optimal mini-invasive treatment for extrahepatic bile duct stones.
METHODOLOGY: One hundred and seventy eight patients with EHBD stones were randomized into 4 groups: laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) plus T-tube drainage (group LT), LC and LCBDE with endonasobiliary drainage (ENBD) tube (group LE), and endoscopic sphincterotomy with ENBD followed by LC (group EE) and T-tube drainage of open CBDE (group OT). Demographic data, perioperative findings, postoperative outcomes, hospital expense, gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) scores and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) were analyzed.
RESULTS: The operating time was longest in group EE. There was less bleeding in group OT and EE. Group LE and EE had shorter hospital stay and recovery time of intestinal motility. The postoperative white blood cell count and serum C-reaction protein level were higher in group LT and OT. Postoperatively, the mean GIQLI scores in group LE and EE were higher. Mean cost were highest in group EE. Patients in group LE had lowest cost per QALY.
CONCLUSIONS: The modified laparoscopic procedure, LC combined with LCBDE followed by a primary closure over the ENBD tubes, appears to be the best option for patients with EHBD stones.
METHODOLOGY: One hundred and seventy eight patients with EHBD stones were randomized into 4 groups: laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) plus T-tube drainage (group LT), LC and LCBDE with endonasobiliary drainage (ENBD) tube (group LE), and endoscopic sphincterotomy with ENBD followed by LC (group EE) and T-tube drainage of open CBDE (group OT). Demographic data, perioperative findings, postoperative outcomes, hospital expense, gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) scores and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) were analyzed.
RESULTS: The operating time was longest in group EE. There was less bleeding in group OT and EE. Group LE and EE had shorter hospital stay and recovery time of intestinal motility. The postoperative white blood cell count and serum C-reaction protein level were higher in group LT and OT. Postoperatively, the mean GIQLI scores in group LE and EE were higher. Mean cost were highest in group EE. Patients in group LE had lowest cost per QALY.
CONCLUSIONS: The modified laparoscopic procedure, LC combined with LCBDE followed by a primary closure over the ENBD tubes, appears to be the best option for patients with EHBD stones.