MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/js9.0000000000002384

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025

Comparison of different segmental metal ureteral stents as maintenance therapy across different years in ureteral stricture management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bian Xiaolong, Hu Haopu, Tian Cong, Wang Chenlong, Lai Chin-Hui, Wang Mingrui, Ji Jiaxiang, Xu Kexin, Xu Tao, Hu Hao

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Ureteral stent placement is a common treatment for relieving hydronephrosis due to ureteral strictures. Recently, segmental metal ureteral stents (MUSs) have emerged as a promising option. However, the efficacy and complications of different segmental MUSs remain controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of different segmental MUSs as the long-term maintenance therapy across different years for ureteral strictures caused by various etiologies.

METHODS

A systematic search of databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase, was conducted to identify studies that employed segmental MUSs. The primary success was defined as the absence of complications necessitating further intervention following successful stent placement and continued patency. The weighted pooled primary success rates of different segmental MUSs were calculated using R over three duration intervals: less than 1, 1-2, and more than 2 years.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies, comprising 1660 cases, were included in the meta-analysis. The weighted pooled primary success rates for segmental MUSs were 73% (95% CI [70%, 77%], I2  = 18%) for durations of less than 1 year, 66% (95% CI [56%, 75%], I2  = 90%) for 1-2 years, and 39% (95% CI [23%, 55%], I2  = 90%) for more than 2 years. The variation in stent types was identified as a significant source of heterogeneity. Notably, the Allium stent exhibited a primary success rate of 81% (95% CI [75%, 87%], I2  = 63%) for the 1-2-year period, and 65% (95% CI [54%, 76%], I2  = 0%) for durations exceeding 2 years, significantly outperforming both the Uventa (1-2 year: 51%; >2 year: 23%) and Memokath (1-2 year: 53%; >2 year: 23%) ( P < 0.001). Moreover, covered stents demonstrated significantly greater efficacy than uncovered stents for 1-2 years (75% vs. 53%; P = 0.01). Complications leading to stent failure primarily included obstruction, migration, encrustation, and urinary tract infection.

CONCLUSION

The safety and efficacy of various segmental MUSs as long-term maintenance therapy for ureteral strictures vary significantly. The Allium stent showing a marked advantage over other stents, making it a preferred choice for long-term management.

Для цитирования: Bian Xiaolong, Hu Haopu, Tian Cong, Wang Chenlong, Lai Chin-Hui, Wang Mingrui, Ji Jiaxiang, Xu Kexin, Xu Tao, Hu Hao. Comparison of different segmental metal ureteral stents as maintenance therapy across different years in ureteral stricture management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. International journal of surgery (London, England). 2025. DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000002384.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.