MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00347-026-02405-z

Медицинская библиотека · Die Ophthalmologie · 2026

[Knowledge and attitudes towards corneal donation among medical students].

Flat Wilhelm, Röck Tobias, Bartz-Schmidt Karl Ulrich, Röck Daniel

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Corneal transplantation can greatly improve or even fully restore vision in people with corneal diseases. In Germany, organ donation rates have been low for many years, so the demand for corneal tissue continues to exceed the available supply. A major reason for this shortage is the limited awareness and understanding of corneal donation. This study aimed to assess the knowledge of medical students at the University of Tübingen about corneal donation and to examine what influence a lecture on the topic could have.

METHODS

A total of 129 students completed a questionnaire with 21 items assessing their attitudes towards and knowledge of corneal donation, both before and after attending a lecture on the subject.

RESULTS

Overall, 77.5% of participants were willing to donate their corneas but only 23.3% had ever discussed the topic with family members. Before the lecture, students answered an average of 4.1 out of 9 knowledge questions correctly (45.6%), compared to 7.7 (85.6%) afterward.

DISCUSSION: Even among advanced medical students, there are considerable knowledge gaps regarding corneal donation. Integrating this topic more deeply into medical education could improve understanding and, in the long run, increase willingness to donate.

Для цитирования: Flat Wilhelm, Röck Tobias, Bartz-Schmidt Karl Ulrich, Röck Daniel. [Knowledge and attitudes towards corneal donation among medical students].. Die Ophthalmologie. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s00347-026-02405-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.