MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/jjco/hyg107

Медицинская библиотека · Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2003

A new perspective on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: nerve topography and over-preservation of the cardinal ligament.

Kato Tomoyasu, Murakami Gen, Yabuki Yoshihiko

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was established by Japanese gynecologists. They identified two parts of the cardinal ligament, namely the vascular part and the neural part, and postulated that the neural part contained the pelvic splanchnic nerves. However, our fresh cadaver studies demonstrated that these nerves ran dorsomedially in contrast to the classical concept. The aim of this study is to further validate this finding in clinical cases.

METHODS

We examined the intraoperative biopsy specimens collected from the neural part of the cardinal ligament in four patients with cervical carcinoma who underwent nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with dissection of the neural part.

RESULTS

Careful dissections demonstrated that the pelvic splanchnic nerves arise from the dorsomedial side of the neural part at the bottom of the pararectal space. The neural part was composed of a connective tissue with focal positive staining by S-100 protein.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose that complete dissection of the cardinal ligament should be performed during nerve-sparing hysterectomy to increase its radicality.

Для цитирования: Kato Tomoyasu, Murakami Gen, Yabuki Yoshihiko. A new perspective on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: nerve topography and over-preservation of the cardinal ligament.. Japanese journal of clinical oncology. 2003. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyg107.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.