A strategy of CT exam protocol to standardize groups of scanners using automated noise assessment and noise prediction for CT radiotherapy simulation.
Аннотация
Objective.Standardizing clinical CT images enables consistent analysis of image data for target delineation, radiomics, and machine learning in personalized medicine. The process of managing the scanned protocols in various CT scanners for radiotherapy simulation is underexplored in the literature. This study uses noise evaluation and prediction models to harmonize CT protocols across scanner models and manufacturers, ensuring reliable data for radiotherapy planning.Approach.A global noise index (GNI) was calculated from 1581 clinical CT exams obtained on five scanners (three from vendorPand two from vendorS: SpandSc). Exams were categorized by anatomical site. GNI was assessed (I) within the same model, (II) between models from the same manufacturer, and (III) across manufacturers. One-way ANOVA (I, III) and studentt-tests (II) evaluated significance (p< 0.05). Predictive models were created and validated with 90 further exams, establishing a reference GNI (GNIref) for future optimization.Results.GNI showed minor variations among P-type and betweenSpandScscanners, butSscanners differed fromP. Predictive model error ranged from 0.8 to 1.5 hounsfield units (HU). GNI differences betweenSandPscanners were <1 HU for head, neck, and paraspinal protocols, butSscanners had 1.5-2 HU higher GNI for the abdomen, pelvis, breast, and lungs.Conclusion.Scanners of the same model show slight variation; minor noise differences exist between manufacturers. Predictive modeling can estimate CT noise and support protocol optimization. The reference GNI of an anatomical site can be derived from sufficient CT exams, with or without the predictive mode; a 1-2 HU difference in GNIrefis achievable if the protocol is properly translated.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.