Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026
INHERITED RETINAL DISEASE MANAGEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES: A Survey of Clinician Practice Patterns.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Pio, Nichols Braden, Wong Calvin W, Sadat Roa, Wykoff Charles C, Staropoli Patrick C, Pearce William A, Al-Khersan Hasenin, Fan Kenneth C
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Recent advances in inherited retinal disease (IRD) management, including genetic testing and emerging therapies, have increased complexity in clinical decision-making. This study examined IRD-related practice patterns among US retina specialists.
METHODS: An 18-item questionnaire developed by a combination of retina and IRD specialists (K.C.F., C.C.W., H.K.) was distributed electronically through email to retinal specialists at 35 non-university-based practices and 37 combined university-based/VA practices across the United States. All retinal specialists at each institution were included and were assessed regarding their practice patterns for genetic testing, genetic counseling and education, referral to subspecialists or certified genetic counselors, and overall comfort level in assessing patients with IRD.
RESULTS: A total of 116 surveys were completed of 481 distributed. 101 of 116 (87.1%) indicated they actively manage patients with IRD and were eligible to complete the survey in its entirety. Overall, most respondents were between the ages of 40 and 60 years (58.6%). 54% were nonuniversity employed, while 46% were university-employed. 60% reported comfort >3 (scale 1-5) in evaluating patients with IRD. 92% of providers regularly send genetic tests, while 55% provide pretest counseling. Of the respondents, 92% performed posttest counseling. In-house genetic counselors were available to 40%. For posttest counseling, while almost all respondents actively see patients with IRD, 51% stated they felt confident (>3, scale 1-5) interpreting genetic testing results.
CONCLUSION: More than 90% of surveyed retinal specialists were involved in managing IRDs, but wide variation in practice and limited confidence highlight the need for clearer IRD care guidelines.
METHODS: An 18-item questionnaire developed by a combination of retina and IRD specialists (K.C.F., C.C.W., H.K.) was distributed electronically through email to retinal specialists at 35 non-university-based practices and 37 combined university-based/VA practices across the United States. All retinal specialists at each institution were included and were assessed regarding their practice patterns for genetic testing, genetic counseling and education, referral to subspecialists or certified genetic counselors, and overall comfort level in assessing patients with IRD.
RESULTS: A total of 116 surveys were completed of 481 distributed. 101 of 116 (87.1%) indicated they actively manage patients with IRD and were eligible to complete the survey in its entirety. Overall, most respondents were between the ages of 40 and 60 years (58.6%). 54% were nonuniversity employed, while 46% were university-employed. 60% reported comfort >3 (scale 1-5) in evaluating patients with IRD. 92% of providers regularly send genetic tests, while 55% provide pretest counseling. Of the respondents, 92% performed posttest counseling. In-house genetic counselors were available to 40%. For posttest counseling, while almost all respondents actively see patients with IRD, 51% stated they felt confident (>3, scale 1-5) interpreting genetic testing results.
CONCLUSION: More than 90% of surveyed retinal specialists were involved in managing IRDs, but wide variation in practice and limited confidence highlight the need for clearer IRD care guidelines.