MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5980/jpnjurol.106.194

Медицинская библиотека · Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology · 2015

[A CASE OF GRANULOCYTIC SARCOMA IN THE BILATERAL URETER].

Miyagawa Tomoaki, Tanaka Ken, Ikeda Atsushi, Komine Manabu, Tsutsumi Masakazu, Shinagawa Atsushi

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A 61-year-old female presented with the complaints of fever and left back pain. She had previously undergone bone marrow transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia and achieved remission. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed left hydronephrosis and suspected tumor lesions in the right upper ureter and left lower ureter. Ureteroscopy was performed for a diagnosis. A yellowish tumor was detected in the left lower ureter, and tissue biopsy was performed. Two weeks after the examination, abdominal CT revealed ascites and retroperitoneal dissemination. The results of the ascites cytology showed infiltration by leukemia cells, and the patient was diagnosed as having recurrent leukemia. A week later, she died. The ureteral tumor was diagnosed as a granulocytic sarcoma. Granulocytic sarcoma, a condition characterized by mass formation outside the bone marrow by granulocytic cells, is classified as a myeloid sarcoma, occurring in an estimated 2-8% of patients with myeloid leukemia. The possibility of granulocytic sarcoma should be considered when treating patients with a history of leukemia.

Для цитирования: Miyagawa Tomoaki, Tanaka Ken, Ikeda Atsushi, Komine Manabu, Tsutsumi Masakazu, Shinagawa Atsushi. [A CASE OF GRANULOCYTIC SARCOMA IN THE BILATERAL URETER].. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology. 2015. DOI: 10.5980/jpnjurol.106.194.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.