Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
Clinician perspectives on antithrombotic therapy management in advanced cancer: a multinational qualitative study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Baddeley Elin, Font Carme, Mahé Isabelle, Edwards Michelle, Sivell Stephanie, Lifford Kate J, Arfuch Victoria Mailen, Coma-Auli Nuri, Søgaard Mette, Enggaard Helle, Helfer Hélène, Mohammed Nassima Si, Seddon Kathy, Mooijaart Simon P, Pearson Mark, Szmit Sebastian, Klok F A, Noble Simon, Højen Anette Arbjerg, SERENITY consortium
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Decision making about antithrombotic therapy (ATT) in patients with advanced cancer near the end of life is fraught with clinical uncertainty and can significantly affect care. Despite its importance and complexity, ATT is often deprioritized or guided by legacy prescribing and monitoring patterns. Management spans multiple specialties, with roles and responsibilities frequently blurred. Clinicians' perspectives remain largely underexplored, which are crucial to inform improved care models.
OBJECTIVES: This study explores clinicians' experiences of current practice of continuing and deprescribing ATT in patients with advanced cancer at the end of life.
METHODS: Qualitative methodology using semistructured interviews with clinicians involved in ATT management at the end of life, across Denmark, France, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Data were analyzed using Framework Analysis.
RESULTS: Eighty clinicians across a range of specialties were interviewed. Two major themes were generated: (1) balancing complexities in ATT management: clinicians reported several challenges, from ambiguity surrounding roles and responsibilities, delicacy around timing, and variance in risk perceptions of ATT, balanced with patient preferences; and (2) culture of continuation: clinicians described a general and ATT-specific culture of continuation and reported a passivity in relation to ATT review.
CONCLUSION: The management of ATT in this context is multifaceted, influenced by many competing factors. These complexities need to be understood and addressed to support decision making related to ATT at the end of life.
OBJECTIVES: This study explores clinicians' experiences of current practice of continuing and deprescribing ATT in patients with advanced cancer at the end of life.
METHODS: Qualitative methodology using semistructured interviews with clinicians involved in ATT management at the end of life, across Denmark, France, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Data were analyzed using Framework Analysis.
RESULTS: Eighty clinicians across a range of specialties were interviewed. Two major themes were generated: (1) balancing complexities in ATT management: clinicians reported several challenges, from ambiguity surrounding roles and responsibilities, delicacy around timing, and variance in risk perceptions of ATT, balanced with patient preferences; and (2) culture of continuation: clinicians described a general and ATT-specific culture of continuation and reported a passivity in relation to ATT review.
CONCLUSION: The management of ATT in this context is multifaceted, influenced by many competing factors. These complexities need to be understood and addressed to support decision making related to ATT at the end of life.