DOI 10.1016/j.rpth.2026.103427
Clinician perspectives on antithrombotic therapy management in advanced cancer: a multinational qualitative study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Decision making about antithrombotic therapy (ATT) in patients with advanced cancer near the end of life is fraught with clinical uncertainty and can significantly affect care. Despite its importance and complexity, ATT is often deprioritized or guided by legacy prescribing and monitoring patterns. Management spans multiple specialties, with roles and responsibilities frequently blurred. Clinicians' perspectives remain largely underexplored, which are crucial to inform improved care models.
OBJECTIVES
This study explores clinicians' experiences of current practice of continuing and deprescribing ATT in patients with advanced cancer at the end of life.
METHODS
Qualitative methodology using semistructured interviews with clinicians involved in ATT management at the end of life, across Denmark, France, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Data were analyzed using Framework Analysis.
RESULTS
Eighty clinicians across a range of specialties were interviewed. Two major themes were generated: (1) balancing complexities in ATT management: clinicians reported several challenges, from ambiguity surrounding roles and responsibilities, delicacy around timing, and variance in risk perceptions of ATT, balanced with patient preferences; and (2) culture of continuation: clinicians described a general and ATT-specific culture of continuation and reported a passivity in relation to ATT review.
CONCLUSION
The management of ATT in this context is multifaceted, influenced by many competing factors. These complexities need to be understood and addressed to support decision making related to ATT at the end of life.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.