European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2018
Prognostic and clinical significance of syndecan-1 expression in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Qiao Weiqiang, Liu Heyang, Guo Wanying, Li Peng, Deng Miao
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of syndecan-1 (SDC1, also called CD138) in breast cancer remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the clinical significance of SDC1 expression in breast cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Various databases were searched to evaluate possible correlations between SDC1 protein or mRNA expression and prognostic significance in breast cancer. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were applied to perform a quantitative meta-analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 1305 breast cancer patients from 9 eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis. Significant associations between elevated SDC1 protein expression and poor disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.12-2.14; P = 0.007) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.61-2.69; P < 0.001) were observed. In addition, enhanced SDC1 protein expression correlated with negative estrogen receptor (ER) expression (OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.64-3.44; P < 0.001) and positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.14-2.76; P = 0.01). However, increased SDC1 protein expression did not correlate with relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.03-3.13; P = 0.33). There were no additional significant correlations observed between SDC1 protein expression and other clinical factors, including tumor size, lymph node involvement, nuclear grade, and progesterone receptor (PR) expression.
CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis demonstrate that increased SDC1 protein expression in breast cancer is significantly associated with worse prognosis in terms of DFS and OS, and an aggressive phenotype is associated with negative ER expression and positive HER2 expression.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Various databases were searched to evaluate possible correlations between SDC1 protein or mRNA expression and prognostic significance in breast cancer. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were applied to perform a quantitative meta-analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 1305 breast cancer patients from 9 eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis. Significant associations between elevated SDC1 protein expression and poor disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.12-2.14; P = 0.007) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.61-2.69; P < 0.001) were observed. In addition, enhanced SDC1 protein expression correlated with negative estrogen receptor (ER) expression (OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.64-3.44; P < 0.001) and positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.14-2.76; P = 0.01). However, increased SDC1 protein expression did not correlate with relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.03-3.13; P = 0.33). There were no additional significant correlations observed between SDC1 protein expression and other clinical factors, including tumor size, lymph node involvement, nuclear grade, and progesterone receptor (PR) expression.
CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis demonstrate that increased SDC1 protein expression in breast cancer is significantly associated with worse prognosis in terms of DFS and OS, and an aggressive phenotype is associated with negative ER expression and positive HER2 expression.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Breast NeoplasmsCarcinomaCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLymph NodesNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingOdds RatioPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRNA, MessengerErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneSurvival RateSyndecan-1Tumor Burden