MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajoc.2025.102460

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2025

Serous maculopathy in congenital cavitary optic disc anomaly: A case series.

Krivit Jenna, Reiter Gregor S, Ye Run Zhou, Darr Kahlen, Schimmenti Lisa A, Iezzi Raymond

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: This study aims to describe an adult child and parent with cavitary optic disc anomalies (CODA) with associated serous maculopathy and a non-coding triplication upstream of MMP19.

DESIGN

Retrospective, single-institution, observational case series.

SUBJECTS: 4 eyes of 2 related patients.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review used electronic medical records to summarize patient medical history, ophthalmology consultations, whole genome analysis, and imaging.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive analysis of multimodal imaging and genomic sequencing.

RESULTS

Patient 1, a 23-year-old male, was referred for visual changes in the setting of paraganglioma. He had evidence of optic disc asymmetry and serous sensory retinal detachment. Whole genome analysis was positive for a triplication upstream of the MMP19 coding region associated with CODA. His mother, patient 2, a 46-year-old female with history of bilateral optic pits, was evaluated after her son was diagnosed with CODA. She had the same MMP 19 triplication. Imaging revealed evidence of resolved serous maculopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe inherited CODA with evidence of current or resolved serous maculopathy.

Для цитирования: Krivit Jenna, Reiter Gregor S, Ye Run Zhou, Darr Kahlen, Schimmenti Lisa A, Iezzi Raymond. Serous maculopathy in congenital cavitary optic disc anomaly: A case series.. American journal of ophthalmology case reports. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2025.102460.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.