MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105579

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2023

A prospective evaluation of the diagnostic potential of EBV-DNA in plasma and whole blood.

Ludvigsen Lene Ugilt Pagter, Andersen Annemette Sloth, Hamilton-Dutoit Stephen, Jensen-Fangel Søren, Bøttger Pernille, Handberg Kurt Jensen, Ivarsen Per, d'Amore Francesco, Bibby Bo Martin, Albertsen Birgitte Klug, Jespersen Bente, Thomsen Marianne Kragh

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-DNA is an important diagnostic tool for EBV-associated disease, but interpretation of its clinical significance is challenging.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the diagnostic and clinical performance of WHO-standardised qPCR for EBV-DNA (WHO EBV-qPCR) in plasma and whole blood (WB) for proven EBV disease in a prospectively accrued patient cohort.

STUDY

DESIGN

Central Denmark Region patients, tested with WHO EBV-qPCR from November 2017 to March 2019, were screened for EBV disease. Incidence (IR) was estimated by Poisson regression. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated for EBV-qPCR in plasma and WB. Risk of diagnostic latency was compared between patients with EBV-positive and EBV-negative lymphomas.

RESULTS

EBV disease was diagnosed in 95 of 1484 participants (IR: 16.3 per 1000 patientyears 95%CI; 13.3-19.9). Sensitivity and specificity of WHO EBV-qPCR in plasma was 82.4% (95% CI; 74.2-90.7%) and 87.8% (95% CI; 85.6-90%), yielding a PPV of 32.2% (95% CI; 24.9-39.5%) and NPV of 98.6% (95% CI; 97.7-99.5%) for proven EBV disease. Sensitivity and NPV were comparable in WB, while specificity and PPV decreased to 66.9% (95% CI; 60.6-73.1%) and 18.1% (95% CI; 7.5-28.7%). Risk of diagnostic latency was 2.3-fold (95% CI 1.4-4.1) higher for patients with EBV-positive compared with EBV-negative lymphomas.

CONCLUSIONS

WHO EBV-qPCR in plasma and WB have a low PPV but a high NPV for proven EBV disease. Implementation of WHO EBV-qPCR could improve interpretation and facilitate EBV-positive lymphoma diagnosis.

Для цитирования: Ludvigsen Lene Ugilt Pagter, Andersen Annemette Sloth, Hamilton-Dutoit Stephen, Jensen-Fangel Søren, Bøttger Pernille, Handberg Kurt Jensen, Ivarsen Per, d'Amore Francesco, Bibby Bo Martin, Albertsen Birgitte Klug, Jespersen Bente, Thomsen Marianne Kragh. A prospective evaluation of the diagnostic potential of EBV-DNA in plasma and whole blood.. Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105579.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.