Comparison of flowcytometry-based scoring system for the diagnosis of early T precursor-acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND

Early T cell precursor-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ETP-ALL) is a hematolymphoid malignancy where the blasts demonstrate T cell differentiation markers along with stem cell and myeloid antigen expression. The differential diagnosis of ETP-ALL from non-ETP ALL and mixed phenotype acute leukemia is often challenging due to its overlapping immunophenotypic picture with co-expression of myeloid antigens. In this study, we endeavored to describe the immune-phenotype profile of ETP-ALL in our patients and compared the utility of four different scoring systems for better discrimination of these entities.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 31 ETP-ALL out of 860 acute leukemia cases consecutively diagnosed at the two tertiary care centers. Flowcytometry-based immunophenotype was reviewed for all the cases, and the utility of four flow-based objective scorings was assessed for the diagnosis of ETP-ALL. Receiver operating curves were drawn to compare the different flow-based scoring systems.

RESULTS

The prevalence of ETP-ALL was 40% (n = 31/77 T-ALL) in our study group, comprised mainly of adults with a median age of 20 years. The five-marker scoring system had the maximum area under the curve, followed by the seven-marker scoring system. A cut-off of ≥2.5 was more specific (sensitivity: 91%; specificity: 100%), while a score of ≥1.5 was more sensitive but slightly less specific (sensitivity: 94%, specificity: 96%).

CONCLUSION

The WHO criteria for the diagnosis of ETP-ALL should be followed across all laboratories to avoid confusion and for better treatment stratification. Flow-based scoring systems can be objectively employed for better detection of cases.