MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.03.001

Медицинская библиотека · Gynecologic oncology · 2025

An open-label randomized active-controlled phase II clinical study to assess the efficacy and safety of afuresertib plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROFECTA-II/GOG-3044).

Herzog Thomas J, Liao John B, Finkelstein Karen, Willmott Lyndsay, Duan Wei, Moroney John W, Buscema Joseph, Campbell-Simms Katie, Yue Yong, Zweizig Susan, Liu Juan, Wang Xiaoyu, Zang Rong-Yu, Yin Rutie, O'Malley David M, Wu Lingying

СтатьяКлиническое исследование II фазыРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety/tolerability of paclitaxel with and without the AKT inhibitor afuresertib in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC).

METHODS

This phase II open-label randomized trial (NCT04374630) enrolled 150 PROC patients to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint, with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and duration of response. Eligible patients received 1-5 prior chemotherapies (≤1 post-PROC therapy). Biomarker analysis assessed PI3K/AKT/PTEN alterations, BRCA1/2-mutations, and phospho-AKT levels. Patients with prior AKT or mTOR inhibitor use were excluded. Randomization was stratified by country and prior use of bevacizumab and platinum-based treatment lines.

RESULTS

In the intent-to-treat population, no statistically significant difference was observed in PFS between afuresertib+paclitaxel (A + P) vs. paclitaxel (Pac) alone (median PFS 4.3mos [95 % CI, 3.58-5.62] vs 4.1mos [95 % CI 2.63-5.36].

PFS HR: 0.7 (95 % CI, 0.50-1.10; P = 0.139). No statistically significant difference in median OS was observed either (11.2mos with A + P, 95 % CI, 8.38-13.77) vs. 13.1mos in Pac arm (95 % CI, 7.75-18) and HR = 1.2 (95 % CI, 0.77-1.81). In AKT mutation biomarker+ (IHC > 1) patients, the median PFS of A + P vs. Pac was 5.4mos vs. 2.9mos (HR = 0.4; 95 % CI, 0.12-1.00). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were consistent with AKT inhibitors, with serious TEAEs in 34.3 % (A + P) vs. 25.5 % (Pac), including diarrhea and gastrointestinal perforations.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of afuresertib to paclitaxel did not significantly improve PFS/OS in patients with PROC. However, exploratory biomarker findings suggest potential efficacy in phospho-AKT positive patients, warranting further investigation. The safety/tolerability profile of A + P was consistent with prior AKT-inhibitor studies.

Для цитирования: Herzog Thomas J, Liao John B, Finkelstein Karen, Willmott Lyndsay, Duan Wei, Moroney John W, Buscema Joseph, Campbell-Simms Katie, Yue Yong, Zweizig Susan, Liu Juan, Wang Xiaoyu, Zang Rong-Yu, Yin Rutie, O'Malley David M, Wu Lingying. An open-label randomized active-controlled phase II clinical study to assess the efficacy and safety of afuresertib plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROFECTA-II/GOG-3044).. Gynecologic oncology. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.03.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.