DOI 10.1186/s12903-026-07744-6
Ten-year marginal bone loss in mandibular overdentures with ball vs. locator attachments: a retrospective cohort study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Ball and locator attachments are widely used for mandibular implant-supported overdentures (IODs), yet long-term comparative data remain limited. This retrospective cohort study evaluated 10-year marginal bone loss (MBL) and peri-implant soft-tissue outcomes in patients restored with two-implant mandibular overdentures.
METHODS
Records of patients treated between 2013 and 2014 were reviewed. Thirty-five patients with complete baseline, 1-, 5-, and 10-year clinical and radiographic data were included. MBL was measured on calibrated panoramic radiographs using a thread-based quantitative method with individualized pixel-millimeter scaling. Probing pocket depth (PPD), plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI) were recorded at each visit. All measurements were performed by a calibrated examiner blinded to group assignment. Group comparisons were conducted at p < 0.05, and effect sizes were used to support clinical interpretation.
RESULTS
Both attachment systems showed stable peri-implant outcomes across the 10-year follow-up. MBL values were comparable between groups (p > 0.05) and remained within clinically acceptable limits. The locator group exhibited a transient mid-term increase in probing depth and gingival index, but these changes were small in magnitude, associated with medium-to-small effect sizes, and resolved by the 10-year evaluation. PI scores were similar between groups at all follow-up intervals.
CONCLUSIONS
Ball and locator attachments demonstrated comparable 10-year peri-implant outcomes, and the minor mid-term soft-tissue variations in the locator group were transient and clinically insignificant.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.