Clinical nuclear medicine · 2026
Comparative Detection Performance of PSMA and Non-PSMA PET Tracers in Recurrent and Primary Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорNetwork Meta-AnalysisСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huang Yu-Erh, Huang Cheng-Kai, Huang Ya-Ting, Tseng Jing-Ren
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted positron emission tomography (PET) tracers have reshaped prostate cancer (PC) imaging, supplementing non-PSMA options such as choline-based agents. However, direct comparative performance data across tracers remain scarce, leaving the optimal choice uncertain. We therefore conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to assess detection rates (DRs) among PET tracers used for primary and biochemically recurrent PC.
METHODS: Following PRISMA-NMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov through March 2025 for studies comparing 2 PET tracers for prostate cancer. The primary outcome was DR, defined as the proportion of PET-positive patients or lesions. Two reviewers independently extracted data on study design, patient demographics, and imaging parameters, and evaluated quality with QUADAS-2. We performed frequentist random-effects NMA to calculate relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs, using 68 Ga-PSMA-11 as reference.
RESULTS: Nineteen studies (1681 patients) addressed biochemical recurrence, and 6 (271 patients) targeted primary PC, with 2 overlapping. Risk of bias was low for most domains, though some uncertainty remained for reference standards and timing. In biochemically recurrent PC, PSMA-directed tracers achieved higher DRs than non-PSMA probes. Within the PSMA tracers, 64 Cu-PSMA-617 achieved the highest estimated DR, followed by 18 F-DCFPyL, 18 F-PSMA-1007, and 68 Ga-PSMA-11. Both 18 F-PSMA-1007 and 18 F-DCFPyL showed higher DRs than 68 Ga-PSMA-11 in primary and recurrent PC.
CONCLUSIONS: PSMA tracers outperform non-PSMA alternatives for detecting biochemical recurrence. Among PSMA tracers, 18 F-labeled agents consistently surpass 68 Ga-PSMA-11 in both biochemically recurrent and primary PC. When available, 18 F-labeled PSMA tracers should be preferred.
METHODS: Following PRISMA-NMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov through March 2025 for studies comparing 2 PET tracers for prostate cancer. The primary outcome was DR, defined as the proportion of PET-positive patients or lesions. Two reviewers independently extracted data on study design, patient demographics, and imaging parameters, and evaluated quality with QUADAS-2. We performed frequentist random-effects NMA to calculate relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs, using 68 Ga-PSMA-11 as reference.
RESULTS: Nineteen studies (1681 patients) addressed biochemical recurrence, and 6 (271 patients) targeted primary PC, with 2 overlapping. Risk of bias was low for most domains, though some uncertainty remained for reference standards and timing. In biochemically recurrent PC, PSMA-directed tracers achieved higher DRs than non-PSMA probes. Within the PSMA tracers, 64 Cu-PSMA-617 achieved the highest estimated DR, followed by 18 F-DCFPyL, 18 F-PSMA-1007, and 68 Ga-PSMA-11. Both 18 F-PSMA-1007 and 18 F-DCFPyL showed higher DRs than 68 Ga-PSMA-11 in primary and recurrent PC.
CONCLUSIONS: PSMA tracers outperform non-PSMA alternatives for detecting biochemical recurrence. Among PSMA tracers, 18 F-labeled agents consistently surpass 68 Ga-PSMA-11 in both biochemically recurrent and primary PC. When available, 18 F-labeled PSMA tracers should be preferred.