European urology open science · 2023
Anterior Sphincter-sparing Suturing of the Vesicourethral Anastomosis During Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Antonelli Luca, Afferi Luca, Mattei Agostino, Fankhauser Christian Daniel
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Continence is an important functional outcome after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP), and modifications of the surgical technique may improve outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To illustrate a novel RARP technique and to describe the observed continence outcomes.
DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective study of men treated with RARP between 2017 and 2021 was conducted.
SURGICAL PROCEDURE: During RARP, periprostatic structures are preserved, the intraprostatic urethra is partially spared, and the anterior anastomosis stitches involve the plexus structures but not the anterior urethra.
MEASUREMENTS: A descriptive analysis of the pathological, functional, and short-term oncological outcomes was performed.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of 640 men, 448 (70%) with at least 1 yr of follow-up and a median age of 66 yr were included. The median operative time was 270 min and the prostatic volume 52 ml. The transurethral catheter was removed after a median of 3 d, and leakage of urine in the first 24 h after catheter removal was observed in 66/448 patients (15%). Positive surgical margins were reported in 104/448 (23%). Prostate-specific antigen persistence after prostatectomy was observed in 26/448 (6%). During a median follow-up of 2 yr (interquartile range 1-3 yr), the biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy was observed in 19/448 patients (4%). One year after prostatectomy, 406/448 patients (91%) were continent and required no pad at all, while 42/448 (9%) required at least one pad per day.
CONCLUSIONS: Not stitching the anterior urethra is a novel technical modification and may improve continence outcomes.
PATIENT SUMMARY: We describe a novel way to stitch the bladder neck to the urethra after removal of the prostate using a surgical robotic system. Our technique appeared safe, with promising urinary continence results.
OBJECTIVE: To illustrate a novel RARP technique and to describe the observed continence outcomes.
DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective study of men treated with RARP between 2017 and 2021 was conducted.
SURGICAL PROCEDURE: During RARP, periprostatic structures are preserved, the intraprostatic urethra is partially spared, and the anterior anastomosis stitches involve the plexus structures but not the anterior urethra.
MEASUREMENTS: A descriptive analysis of the pathological, functional, and short-term oncological outcomes was performed.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of 640 men, 448 (70%) with at least 1 yr of follow-up and a median age of 66 yr were included. The median operative time was 270 min and the prostatic volume 52 ml. The transurethral catheter was removed after a median of 3 d, and leakage of urine in the first 24 h after catheter removal was observed in 66/448 patients (15%). Positive surgical margins were reported in 104/448 (23%). Prostate-specific antigen persistence after prostatectomy was observed in 26/448 (6%). During a median follow-up of 2 yr (interquartile range 1-3 yr), the biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy was observed in 19/448 patients (4%). One year after prostatectomy, 406/448 patients (91%) were continent and required no pad at all, while 42/448 (9%) required at least one pad per day.
CONCLUSIONS: Not stitching the anterior urethra is a novel technical modification and may improve continence outcomes.
PATIENT SUMMARY: We describe a novel way to stitch the bladder neck to the urethra after removal of the prostate using a surgical robotic system. Our technique appeared safe, with promising urinary continence results.