MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf03161215

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2008

Medical toxicology and public health-update on research and activities at the centers for disease control and prevention and the agency for toxic substances and disease registry.

Snook Curtis P, Cardarelli John, Mickelsen R Leroy, Mattorano Dino, Nalipinski Michael

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

An extensive review of CDC epidemiological responses to human outbreaks of anthrax from occupational settings between the years of 1950 and 2001 documented a variety of approaches to mitigation and decontamination [2]. These approaches included taking no action, burning contaminated materials, chlorinating water supplies, instituting administrative and engineering controls and PPE, vaccinating potentially exposed individuals, and in 2 instances, fumigating with formaldehyde vapor (now considered to be a human carcinogen). Secondary contamination of a worker's home was documented in 1 case, but not felt to be clinically significant to warrant any decontamination efforts. In response to the B. anthracis attacks in 2001, chlorine dioxide fumigation, vaporous hydrogen peroxide fumigation, and a combination of HEPA vacuuming, cleaning, and bleach application were all techniques used successfully to clean B. anthracis spore contamination.

Для цитирования: Snook Curtis P, Cardarelli John, Mickelsen R Leroy, Mattorano Dino, Nalipinski Michael. Medical toxicology and public health-update on research and activities at the centers for disease control and prevention and the agency for toxic substances and disease registry.. Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology. 2008. DOI: 10.1007/bf03161215.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.