BMC cancer · 2025
Claudin 18.2 expression profile in primary tumors and their ovarian metastases: implications for targeted therapy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim Nah Ihm, Koo Joo Yeon, Kim Sung Sun, Lee Ji Young, Lee Ji Shin, Bang Hyun Jin, Bae Woo Kyun, Yoon Tae Mi, Moon Kyung-Sub, Lee Jae-Hyuk, Lee Kyung-Hwa
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2), a tight junction protein predominantly expressed in the normal gastric epithelium, has recently emerged as a potential therapeutic target in various solid tumors. Despite growing interest, comprehensive data on CLDN18.2 expression across primary tumors from different organs and their corresponding metastatic lesions remain limited.
METHODS: This study analyzed CLDN18.2 expression in 102 patients with primary adenocarcinomas from various organs and their corresponding ovarian metastatic carcinomas and in 81 cases of primary ovarian mucinous tumors using immunohistochemistry. We evaluated the association of CLDN18.2 expression with clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes.
RESULTS: The highest CLDN18.2 positivity rate was observed in gastric adenocarcinomas (40%, 12/30), followed by cervical adenocarcinomas (20%, 1/5) and colorectal adenocarcinomas (4%, 2/50). Notably, primary ovarian mucinous tumors showed remarkably high expression rates, reaching 77% overall and 100% in mucinous borderline tumors. In contrast, adenocarcinomas of the appendix and breast lacked CLDN18 expression. While CLDN18.2 expression was generally maintained during metastasis, some variations in expression patterns were observed, particularly in gastric cancers (13%, 4/30). Our analysis found no significant correlation between CLDN18.2 expression and overall survival in the patient cohort.
CONCLUSION: The preserved expression of CLDN18.2 in metastatic tumors underscores its potential utility as a target for therapeutic approaches. Our findings emphasize the importance of evaluating CLDN18.2 status in both primary and metastatic tumors to refine therapeutic strategies.
METHODS: This study analyzed CLDN18.2 expression in 102 patients with primary adenocarcinomas from various organs and their corresponding ovarian metastatic carcinomas and in 81 cases of primary ovarian mucinous tumors using immunohistochemistry. We evaluated the association of CLDN18.2 expression with clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes.
RESULTS: The highest CLDN18.2 positivity rate was observed in gastric adenocarcinomas (40%, 12/30), followed by cervical adenocarcinomas (20%, 1/5) and colorectal adenocarcinomas (4%, 2/50). Notably, primary ovarian mucinous tumors showed remarkably high expression rates, reaching 77% overall and 100% in mucinous borderline tumors. In contrast, adenocarcinomas of the appendix and breast lacked CLDN18 expression. While CLDN18.2 expression was generally maintained during metastasis, some variations in expression patterns were observed, particularly in gastric cancers (13%, 4/30). Our analysis found no significant correlation between CLDN18.2 expression and overall survival in the patient cohort.
CONCLUSION: The preserved expression of CLDN18.2 in metastatic tumors underscores its potential utility as a target for therapeutic approaches. Our findings emphasize the importance of evaluating CLDN18.2 status in both primary and metastatic tumors to refine therapeutic strategies.