Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
Artificial Intelligence-Based Body Composition Analysis Reveals Sex-Specific Prognostic Markers and Their Clinical Value in Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Tianxiang, Liu Tingting, Yang Qian, Zhang Zhiqing, Guo Xiaofang, Wang Xiang, Zhang Yihan, Ge Limin, Su Yu, Wu Wenjun, Guo Weihua, Wang Zheng, Yang Lian, Niu Yanfeng
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Conventional body composition assessment fails to capture its multidimensional complexity in gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to systematically evaluate multidimensional body composition and its clinical relevance in GC.
METHODS: 1196 GC patients and 983 healthy controls were retrospectively enrolled. Body composition was segmented using nnU-Net. Propensity score matching was used to compare body composition differences between patients and healthy controls. Prognostic value was assessed across treatment cohorts. TCGA pathological and transcriptomic data were integrated for exploratory analyses. Sex-specific prognostic models were developed and externally validated.
RESULTS: AI-drived body compositions parameters showed sex-specific associations with survival. Higher muscle/fat area/index and lower fat density correlated with longer survival in surgical patients (L1 muscle area: HR = 0.438, ad p = 0.001). In ICI-treated females, higher subcutaneous fat area (SFA) improved survival (L2SFA: HR = 0.972, ad p = 0.045). Potential associations were observed between body composition and tumor microenvironmental features, including stromal composition, EMT-related pathways, and immune infiltration. Sex-specific prognostic models achieved C-indices of 0.723 (males) and 0.705 (females) in test cohorts, outperforming conventional predictors.
CONCLUSION: Multidimensional body composition is associated with prognosis in GC and may serve as a complementary biomarker for risk stratification.
METHODS: 1196 GC patients and 983 healthy controls were retrospectively enrolled. Body composition was segmented using nnU-Net. Propensity score matching was used to compare body composition differences between patients and healthy controls. Prognostic value was assessed across treatment cohorts. TCGA pathological and transcriptomic data were integrated for exploratory analyses. Sex-specific prognostic models were developed and externally validated.
RESULTS: AI-drived body compositions parameters showed sex-specific associations with survival. Higher muscle/fat area/index and lower fat density correlated with longer survival in surgical patients (L1 muscle area: HR = 0.438, ad p = 0.001). In ICI-treated females, higher subcutaneous fat area (SFA) improved survival (L2SFA: HR = 0.972, ad p = 0.045). Potential associations were observed between body composition and tumor microenvironmental features, including stromal composition, EMT-related pathways, and immune infiltration. Sex-specific prognostic models achieved C-indices of 0.723 (males) and 0.705 (females) in test cohorts, outperforming conventional predictors.
CONCLUSION: Multidimensional body composition is associated with prognosis in GC and may serve as a complementary biomarker for risk stratification.