MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000028938

Медицинская библиотека · Medicine · 2022

Treatment of refractory MALT lymphoma by lenalidomide plus bendamustine: A case report.

Zhou Zhencang, Wu Pengqiang, Wang Fujue, Tao Huan, Chen Yingying, Gao Jie, Chen Dengke, Jia Yongqian

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

RATIONALE: Marginal zone B cell lymphoma of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT lymphoma) has an indolent natural course and disseminates slowly. However, there is currently no consensus regarding the optimal treatment strategy for relapsed/refractory MALT lymphomas. Lenalidomide-bendamustine may be an effective regimen for such cases.

PATIENT CONCERNS: A 48-year-old Chinese male patient with MALT lymphoma and API2/MALT received 2 courses of standard-dose rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone regimen chemotherapy combined with Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. However, this disease was not effectively managed.

DIAGNOSIS: MALT lymphoma.

INTERVENTIONS: The patient received lenalidomide-bendamustine (lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1-21 and bendamustine 90 mg/m2 on days 1-2) for 6 courses.

OUTCOMES: Lenalidomide-bendamustine was a safe and effective chemotherapy. No serious adverse events occurred during the treatment period. Ultrasound gastroscopy revealed that the tumor gradually shrank and eventually disappeared to complete remission.

LESSONS: The lenalidomide-bendamustine scheme might be a potentially effective option for patients with refractory or relapsed MALT lymphoma.

Для цитирования: Zhou Zhencang, Wu Pengqiang, Wang Fujue, Tao Huan, Chen Yingying, Gao Jie, Chen Dengke, Jia Yongqian. Treatment of refractory MALT lymphoma by lenalidomide plus bendamustine: A case report.. Medicine. 2022. DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000028938.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.