MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.18926/amo/53340

Медицинская библиотека · Acta medica Okayama · 2015

Aggressive multimodality treatment for advanced rectal cancer.

Inada Ryo, Nagasaka Takeshi, Toshima Toshiaki, Mori Yoshiko, Kondo Yoshitaka, Kishimoto Hiroyuki, Hiraki Takao, Oshiro Taihei, Kanemitsu Yukihide, Fujiwara Toshiyoshi

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A case of advanced rectal cancer treated by aggressive local and systemic treatment who has survived more than 7 years from initial recurrence is presented. A 55-year-old woman was diagnosed with advanced lower rectal cancer and underwent a low anterior resection with complete removal of all regional lymph nodes and total mesorectal excision. The tumor was diagnosed as a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, pStage IIIB (T3, N2a, M0). Twenty-six months after the initial surgery, local recurrence in the pelvis was detected by computed tomography, and total pelvic exenteration with distal sacrectomy (TPES) was performed after systemic chemotherapy with a molecular-targeted drug. Six months after the TPES, multiple lung metastases were detected. Consequently, the patient underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and chemotherapy. The disease has since been controlled for 38 months. As volume control is essential for cancer treatment, it may be important to combine appropriate local therapy with systemic therapy to metastatic or recurrent sites in order to achieve much longer disease control.

Для цитирования: Inada Ryo, Nagasaka Takeshi, Toshima Toshiaki, Mori Yoshiko, Kondo Yoshitaka, Kishimoto Hiroyuki, Hiraki Takao, Oshiro Taihei, Kanemitsu Yukihide, Fujiwara Toshiyoshi. Aggressive multimodality treatment for advanced rectal cancer.. Acta medica Okayama. 2015. DOI: 10.18926/amo/53340.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.