DOI 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109853
Big bladder stone accompanied by big posterior urethral stone: A management of rare case report.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND
IMPORTANCE
Urinary tract stones are a common disease, but concurrent large-size stones in the bladder and urethra are rare. This phenomenon can lead to obstruction, infection, and other complications. We reported the management of a rare case of a giant bladder stone accompanied by a big posterior urethral stone.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 36-year-old man with a chief complaint of not being able to have spontaneous micturition, frequent expulsion of stones from the penis, and a history of hematuria. Bladder examination revealed a giant bladder stone of 1278 Hounsfield Unit (HU) with a size of 4.1 × 7.2 cm, and urethral examination revealed a stone of 1275 Hounsfield Unit (HU) with a length of 4.3 × 4.2 cm, without mass. This patient underwent vesicolithotomy and urethrotomy. The evaluation showed spontaneous micturition and dissolved hydronephrosis.
CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Urinary tract stone management primarily involves endourology or open surgery. For smaller stones (<5-6 mm), medication is sufficient, as they often pass spontaneously. Larger stones may require interventions like vesicolithotomy or urethrotomy. Vesicolithotomy is preferred for complex or large bladder stones, while urethrotomy is performed if the stone location is palpable or seen on imaging. These procedures are practical options for general surgeons in first-level hospitals.
CONCLUSION
Concurrent large bladder and urethral stones are uncommon. Endourology or open surgery is typically employed. Treatment selection should be personalized to individual patient assessment to mitigate potential complications effectively.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.