Mohs Micrographic Surgery Efficacy for Solid Organ Transplant Head and Neck Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients carry a higher incidence of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) with more aggressive features and worse outcomes compared to immunocompetent (IC) patients. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network advocates peripheral and deep en-face margin assessment such as Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for very-high-risk cSCC. We aim to assess the efficacy of MMS in the treatment of SOT immunosuppressed head and neck (HN) cSCC patients.
STUDY
DESIGN
Cohort study with planned chart review enrolling HN cSCC patients (2004-2017).
SETTING
Patients were enrolled from a tertiary care medical center registry.
METHODS
Patients with cSCC were categorized on the independent variable of immune status. The incidence of MMS was compared between IC and SOT patients. Subgroup analysis of a matched cohort of patients treated with only MMS was performed for patient demographics, tumor characteristics, recurrence rates, and survival.
RESULTS
A total Of 178 HN cSCC patients met the criteria. SOT patients were more likely to be treated with MMS, P < .001. In the subgroup analysis, 34 matched patients were treated with MMS alone. There was homogeneity between groups regarding patient demographics and tumor characteristics. One patient developed local recurrence in the SOT cohort (P = .310). Compared to IC cSCC patients, SOT patients treated with MMS did not experience worse disease-free or overall survival (OS) (P = .540).
CONCLUSION
This study suggests that narrow-margin MMS is an appropriate treatment option for SOT cSCC patients. SOT patients were more likely to be treated with MMS and did not compromise local recurrence, disease-free, or OS.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.