MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00192-026-06804-3

Медицинская библиотека · International urogynecology journal · 2026

Are We Missing the Bladder? Reflections on Endometriosis and IC/BPS.

Di Favero Giovanni, Zeppernick Felix, Zeppernick Magdalena, Pfiffer Tatiana, Schwandner Thilo, Meinhold-Heerlein Ivo

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Endometriosis and interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) frequently coexist in women with chronic pelvic pain, yet overlapping symptoms and non-standardized diagnostic pathways often delay recognition of dual pathology. We propose that a structured surgical approach combining laparoscopy and diagnostic cystoscopy may improve identification and clinical characterization of this overlap. On the basis of prospective surgical experience in women with suspected endometriosis and concomitant bladder symptoms, optical assessment enables phenotypic differentiation of bladder-centric and non-bladder-centric IC/BPS. When cystoscopic features are present, initiation of a standardized bladder-directed therapeutic strategy alongside endometriosis treatment may enhance symptom control and reduce persistent pain. Systematic evaluation during a single surgical setting has the potential to increase diagnostic precision, minimize incomplete interventions, and support individualized, mechanism-based management. This opinion highlights the importance of integrated diagnostic algorithms and multidisciplinary care models to address the complex interplay between endometriosis and IC/BPS.

Для цитирования: Di Favero Giovanni, Zeppernick Felix, Zeppernick Magdalena, Pfiffer Tatiana, Schwandner Thilo, Meinhold-Heerlein Ivo. Are We Missing the Bladder? Reflections on Endometriosis and IC/BPS.. International urogynecology journal. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-026-06804-3.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.