MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/jom.0b013e318157d305

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2007

Assessing the safety of anthrax immunization in US Army aircrew members via physical examination.

Downing Jill, Greig Thomas W, Quattlebaum Martin D, Valentin Manuel, Heeren Timothy C, Grabenstein John D

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Anthrax in weaponized form is the bioterrorism agent of most concern. Questions raised about the safety of the anthrax vaccine can be addressed by comparing immunized and unimmunized people in population-based studies.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of data from periodic physical examinations collected on anthrax-immunized and -unimmunized US Army aircrew members between 1998 and 2005 was performed to evaluate the safety of anthrax immunization. Mean changes in variables found on physical examination and laboratory analysis were compared by use of t tests. Multiple linear regression predicted change in outcome from baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

We compared 6,820 immunized subjects and 4,145 unimmunized controls based on US Army aircrew physical examination and screening laboratory tests. No association between anthrax immunization and a clinically relevant change in a tested physiologic parameter was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

No attributable risk of anthrax immunization was observed in this group of Army aircrew members.

Для цитирования: Downing Jill, Greig Thomas W, Quattlebaum Martin D, Valentin Manuel, Heeren Timothy C, Grabenstein John D. Assessing the safety of anthrax immunization in US Army aircrew members via physical examination.. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine. 2007. DOI: 10.1097/jom.0b013e318157d305.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.