American journal of public health · 2007
Facilitation of risk communication during the anthrax attacks of 2001: the organizational backstory.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chess Caron, Clarke Lee
Аннотация
The anthrax attacks of 2001 created risk communication problems that cannot be fully understood without appreciating the dynamics among organizations. Case studies of communication in New Jersey, consisting of interviews with a range of participants, found that existing organizational and professional networks facilitated trust among decisionmakers. This interpersonal trust improved communication among agencies and thereby risk communication with the public. For example, "white powder scares" were a problem even in places without contamination. Professionals' trust in each other was vital for responding productively. Conversely, organizational challenges, including conflict among agencies, hindered communication with key audiences. Although centralization and increased control are often seen as the remedy for communicative confusion, they also can quash the improvisational responses needed during crises.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AnthraxBacillus anthracisBioterrorismCommunicationCorrespondence as TopicDecision Making, OrganizationalFearHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationInterinstitutional RelationsInterviews as TopicNew JerseyOrganizational Case StudiesOrganizational InnovationPostal ServicePublic Health AdministrationRisk AssessmentTrustUnited States