MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0274161

Медицинская библиотека · PloS one · 2022

Two-step nationwide epidemiological survey of myasthenia gravis in Japan 2018.

Yoshikawa Hiroaki, Adachi Yumi, Nakamura Yosikazu, Kuriyama Nagato, Murai Hiroyuki, Nomura Yoshiko, Sakai Yasunari, Iwasa Kazuo, Furukawa Yutaka, Kuwabara Satoshi, Matsui Makoto, Taskforce of Validation of Evidence-based Diagnosis and Guidelines, and Impact on Quality of Life (QOL) in Patients with Neuroimmunological Diseases

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To study the updated prevalence and clinical features of myasthenia gravis (MG) in Japan during 2017.

METHODS

We sent survey sheets to the randomly selected medical departments (number = 7,545). First, we asked the number of MG patients who visited medical departments from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017. Then, we sent the second survey sheet to the medical departments that answered the first survey to obtain the clinical information of patients who received MG diagnosis between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017.

RESULTS

The received answer to the first survey were 2,708 (recovery rate: 35.9%). After all, the prevalence of the 100,000 population was estimated as 23.1 (95%CI: 20.5-25.6). As a result of the second survey, we obtained 1,464 case records. After checking the duplications and lacking data, we utilized 1,195 data for further analysis. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] from the onset age of total patients was 59 (43-70) years old. The male-female ratio was 1: 1.15. The onset age [median (IQR)] for female patients was 58 (40-72) years old, and that for male patients was 60 (49-69) years old (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.0299). We divided patients into four categories: 1) anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChRAb) (+) thymoma (Tm) (-), 2) AChRAb(+)Tm(+), 3) anti-muscle-specific kinase antibody (MuSKAb) (+), and AChRAb(-)MuSKAb(-) (double negative; DN). The onset age [median (IQR)] of AChRAb(+)Tm(-) was 64 (48-73) years old, and AChRb(+)Tm(+) was 55 (45-66), MuSKAb(+) was 49 (36-64), DN was 47 (35-60) year old. The multivariate logistic regression analysis using sex, initial symptoms, repetitive nerve stimulation test (RNST), and edrophonium test revealed that sex, ocular symptoms, bulbar symptoms, and RNST were factors to distinguish each category. The myasthenia gravis activities of daily living profile at the severest state were significantly higher in MuSKAb(+). MuSKAb(+) frequently received prednisolone, tacrolimus plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin; however, they received less acetylcholine esterase inhibitor. 99.2% of AChRAb(+)Tm(+) and 15.4% of AChRAb(+)Tm(-) received thymectomy. MuSKAb(+) did not receive thymectomy, and only 5.7% of DN received thymectomy. The prognosis was favorable in all categories.

CONCLUSION

Our result revealed that the prevalence of Japanese MG doubled from the previous study using the same survey method in 2006. We also found that the onset age shifted to the elderly, and the male-female ratio reached almost even. Classification in four categories; AChRAb(+)Tm(-), AChRAb(+)Tm(+), MuSKAb(+), and DN, well describe the specific clinical features of each category and differences in therapeutic approaches.

Для цитирования: Yoshikawa Hiroaki, Adachi Yumi, Nakamura Yosikazu, Kuriyama Nagato, Murai Hiroyuki, Nomura Yoshiko, Sakai Yasunari, Iwasa Kazuo, Furukawa Yutaka, Kuwabara Satoshi, Matsui Makoto, Taskforce of Validation of Evidence-based Diagnosis and Guidelines, and Impact on Quality of Life (QOL) in Patients with Neuroimmunological Diseases. Two-step nationwide epidemiological survey of myasthenia gravis in Japan 2018.. PloS one. 2022. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274161.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.