Intraligamentary Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients: Is It an Effective Technique? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background

Effective pain control is fundamental in pediatric dentistry. Supraperiosteal infiltration (SPA) and inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) are the most used local anesthesia (LA) techniques. This review evaluated the available evidence on intraligamentary anesthesia (ILA) to assess its efficacy, safety, and viability as an alternative to conventional techniques.

Methods

The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261284494) and conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Three databases were searched for RCTs published in English after 2000 involving children. Studies that compared ILA, delivered via either traditional or computer-controlled systems (CC-ILA), with other LA techniques were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane's RoB 2.0 tool. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with Stata/SE 18.0.

Results

The database search yielded 347 records; after duplicate removal, 153 articles were screened. Thirty-four papers were assessed, of which thirteen studies were included, and three were retained for the meta-analysis. Significantly lower pain perception and improved physiological parameters were reported with ILA compared with IANB. CC-ILA demonstrated greater efficacy and reduced procedural discomfort than conventional ILA. Patients favored CC-ILA over IANB (68.0% vs. 32.0%). Postoperative lip biting occurred more frequently following IANB and CC-SPA than after ILA. Overall risk of bias was low. Meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in pain perception between ILA and IANB (z = -0.26; p = 0.79).

Conclusions

ILA, particularly CC-ILA, appears to be an effective, safe, and well-tolerated technique and may be considered a valid anesthetic option in pediatric dentistry. The review did not receive any funding.