MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.26566

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2020

Variations in the association of grade with survival across the head and neck cancer landscape.

Anderson Eric M, Luu Michael, Balzer Bonnie L, Scher Kevin S, Mita Alain C, Lu Diana J, Shiao Stephen L, Clair Jon Mallen-St, Ho Allen S, Zumsteg Zachary S

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Although pathologic tumor grade is a well-established prognostic risk factor that impacts staging and treatment decisions across multiple cancer types, its role in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is less certain.

METHODS

HNSCC patients diagnosed from 2010 to 2015 and undergoing primary surgery in the National Cancer Data Base were identified. Propensity score matching and multivariable Cox regression were performed.

RESULTS

Among 27 041 HNSCC patients, 13 941 had oral cavity cancers (OCC). Intermediate-grade (hazard ratio [HR] 1.16, 95% CI 1.07-1.26, P < .001) and high-grade (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.26-1.52, P < .001) tumors had worse survival than low-grade tumors. This magnitude was comparable to other well-established prognostic factors, including margin positivity, extranodal extension, and lymphovascular invasion. By contrast, there was no association between grade and survival in larynx/hypopharynx or HPV(-) oropharynx cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic impact of pathologic grade is highly variable across head and neck subsites and is the strongest among OCC patients.

Для цитирования: Anderson Eric M, Luu Michael, Balzer Bonnie L, Scher Kevin S, Mita Alain C, Lu Diana J, Shiao Stephen L, Clair Jon Mallen-St, Ho Allen S, Zumsteg Zachary S. Variations in the association of grade with survival across the head and neck cancer landscape.. Head & neck. 2020. DOI: 10.1002/hed.26566.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.