Mobile DNA · 2025
Structural features of somatic and germline retrotransposition events in humans.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nummi Päivi, Cajuso Tatiana, Norri Tuukka, Taira Aurora, Kuisma Heli, Välimäki Niko, Lepistö Anna, Renkonen-Sinisalo Laura, Koskensalo Selja, Seppälä Toni T, Ristimäki Ari, Tahkola Kyösti, Mattila Anne, Böhm Jan, Mecklin Jukka-Pekka, Siili Emma, Pasanen Annukka, Heikinheimo Oskari, Bützow Ralf, Karhu Auli, Burns Kathleen H, Palin Kimmo, Aaltonen Lauri A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Transposons are DNA sequences able to move or copy themselves to other genomic locations leading to insertional mutagenesis. Although transposon-derived sequences account for half of the human genome, most elements are no longer transposition competent. Moreover, transposons are normally repressed through epigenetic silencing in healthy adult tissues but become derepressed in several human cancers, with high activity detected in colorectal cancer. Their impact on non-malignant and malignant tissue as well as the differences between somatic and germline retrotransposition remain poorly understood. With new sequencing technologies, including long read sequencing, we can access intricacies of retrotransposition, such as insertion sequence details and nested repeats, that have been previously challenging to characterize.
RESULTS: In this study, we investigate somatic and germline retrotransposition by analyzing long read sequencing from 56 colorectal cancers and 112 uterine leiomyomas. We identified 1495 somatic insertions in colorectal samples, while striking lack of insertions was detected in uterine leiomyomas. Our findings highlight differences between somatic and germline events, such as transposon type distribution, insertion length, and target site preference. Leveraging long-read sequencing, we provide an in-depth analysis of the twin-priming phenomenon, detecting it across transposable element types that remain active in humans, including Alus. Additionally, we detect an abundance of germline transposons in repetitive DNA, along with a relationship between replication timing and insertion target site.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals a stark contrast in somatic transposon activity between colorectal cancers and uterine leiomyomas, and highlights differences between somatic and germline transposition. This suggests potentially different conditions in malignant and non-malignant tissues, as well as in germline and somatic tissues, which could be involved in the transposition process. Long-read sequencing provided important insights into transposon behavior, allowing detailed examination of structural features such as twin priming and nested elements.
RESULTS: In this study, we investigate somatic and germline retrotransposition by analyzing long read sequencing from 56 colorectal cancers and 112 uterine leiomyomas. We identified 1495 somatic insertions in colorectal samples, while striking lack of insertions was detected in uterine leiomyomas. Our findings highlight differences between somatic and germline events, such as transposon type distribution, insertion length, and target site preference. Leveraging long-read sequencing, we provide an in-depth analysis of the twin-priming phenomenon, detecting it across transposable element types that remain active in humans, including Alus. Additionally, we detect an abundance of germline transposons in repetitive DNA, along with a relationship between replication timing and insertion target site.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals a stark contrast in somatic transposon activity between colorectal cancers and uterine leiomyomas, and highlights differences between somatic and germline transposition. This suggests potentially different conditions in malignant and non-malignant tissues, as well as in germline and somatic tissues, which could be involved in the transposition process. Long-read sequencing provided important insights into transposon behavior, allowing detailed examination of structural features such as twin priming and nested elements.