MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.14989/actauroljap_66_7_229

Медицинская библиотека · Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica · 2020

[A Case of Renal Epithelioid Angiomyolipoma with Recurrence in the Abdominal Cavity].

Fujiwara Maki, Hoshiyama Akihiro, Takahashi Takehiro, Takashima Yasushi, Kohno Yuka, Ueda Masakatsu, Kawanishi Hiroaki, Okumura Kazuhiro

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A 37-year-old man with no symptoms or family history of tuberous sclerosis complex presented to our hospital with abdominal pain in 2013. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a rupture in the right renal angiomyolipoma (AML) having a maximum diameter of 7 cm. He had undergone a transarterial embolization. Follow-up CT showed an increase in the size of the right tumor to 11 cm, and therefore, right nephrectomy was performed in 2016. The diagnosis of epithelioid AML (EAML) was confirmed. In 2019, he was diagnosed with a solitary tumor near right-sided transverse colon, which was resected and showed recurrence of EAML. He was disease-free 6 months after surgery. EAML has malignant potential, with 30-50% of reported EAML cases resulting in local recurrence or distant metastasis. Previous recurrence or metastasis may occur 0.25-12 years postoperatively. Furthermore, multiple and unresectable recurrences or metastases, arising early in the postoperative period may lead to a poor outcome. Therefore, close and long-term follow-up is required.

Для цитирования: Fujiwara Maki, Hoshiyama Akihiro, Takahashi Takehiro, Takashima Yasushi, Kohno Yuka, Ueda Masakatsu, Kawanishi Hiroaki, Okumura Kazuhiro. [A Case of Renal Epithelioid Angiomyolipoma with Recurrence in the Abdominal Cavity].. Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica. 2020. DOI: 10.14989/actauroljap_66_7_229.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.