MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900330

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of impotence research · 1998

Penile prosthesis implantation in the treatment of Peyronie's disease.

Carson C C

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the results and complications of penile prosthesis implantation in patients with erectile dysfunction caused by Peyronie's disease.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Men undergoing surgical intervention for erectile dysfunction caused by Peyronie's disease at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine were reviewed. Patients included 30 men aged 29-64 (mean = 49.6) with a duration of Peyronie's disease from 12-72 months (mean = 31.4 months). All men had palpable Peyronie's plague, significant penile curvature and plaque formation. All patients underwent implantation of AMS 700CX penile prostheses from 1993 to 1997.

RESULTS

Penile straightening was carried out using modeling in 28 (93%) while plaque incision was necessary in 2 men (7%). All patients had a resultant straight penis with functional penile implant. There were no patients who suffered penile prosthesis infection and no mechanical malfunctions were observed during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Penile prosthesis implantation with modeling is a safe, simple, effective technique for straightening penile curvature in patients undergoing implantation of penile prosthesis for Peyronie's disease. Penile prosthesis implantation is a safe, effective, low morbidity method for restoring potency in men with male erectile dysfunction and Peyronie's disease.

Для цитирования: Carson C C. Penile prosthesis implantation in the treatment of Peyronie's disease.. International journal of impotence research. 1998. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900330.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.