MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2006.01931.x

Медицинская библиотека · Letters in applied microbiology · 2006

Comparison of PCR, culture and microscopy of blood smears for the diagnosis of anthrax in sheep and cattle.

Berg T, Suddes H, Morrice G, Hornitzky M

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIMS: To compare microscopy, culture and PCR for the diagnosis of anthrax in blood samples from sheep and cattle.

METHODS AND

RESULTS

Blood samples were stored at room temperature and at 37 degrees C after receipt, over a period of 15-17 days. Aliquots were plated onto blood agar and blood smears were prepared. Following microscopic examination, DNA was extracted from blood smears and subjected to a multiplex PCR assay targeting the Ba813, cap and lef markers.

CONCLUSIONS

PCR provided the most reliable means for the detection of Bacillus anthracis in deteriorating blood samples (15-17 days) and was also successful in diagnosing anthrax in blood smears that had been stored for 6 years and a blood sample which had been stored for 18 months at -20 degrees C. While less successful than PCR, culture for B. anthracis on 7% sheep blood agar was typically more reliable (2-17 days) than the examination of blood smears (2-6 days) for encapsulated bacilli.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This work demonstrated the superiority of PCR for the diagnosis of anthrax from blood smear scrapings, particularly when microscopy is unreliable.

Для цитирования: Berg T, Suddes H, Morrice G, Hornitzky M. Comparison of PCR, culture and microscopy of blood smears for the diagnosis of anthrax in sheep and cattle.. Letters in applied microbiology. 2006. DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2006.01931.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.