MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2024.0452

Медицинская библиотека · International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology · 2024

Retrograde intrarenal surgery with or without ureteral access sheath: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

de Amorim Lucas Guimarães Campos Roriz, Campos Marcelo Esteves Chaves, Dumont Lígia Sant'Ana, Peñafiel José Augusto Rojas, de Abreu Eliabe Silva, Marchini Giovanni Scala, Monga Manoj, Mazzucchi Eduardo

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

The ureteral access sheath (UAS) is a medical device that enables repeated entrance into the ureter and collecting system during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Its impact on stone-free rates, ureteral injuries, operative time, and postoperative complications remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing RIRS with versus without UAS for urolithiasis management.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes from retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for stone extraction with or without ureteral access sheath (UAS); evaluating stone-free rate (SFR), ureteral injuries, operative time, and postoperative complications.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library in June 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety outcomes of UAS use in RIRS for urolithiasis treatment. Articles published between 2014 and 2024 were included. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) were calculated for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively.

RESULTS

Five RCTs comprising 466 procedures were included. Of these, 246 (52.7%) utilized UAS. The follow-up ranged from 1 week to 1 month. UAS reduced the incidence of postoperative fever (RR 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.84; p=0.009), and postoperative infection (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.30-0.83; p=0.008). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of SFR (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.99-1.11; p=0.10), ureteral injuries (RR 1.29; 95% CI 0.95-1.75; p=0.11), operative time (MD 3.56 minutes; 95% CI -4.15 to 11.27 minutes; p=0.36), or length of stay (MD 0.32 days; 95% CI -0.42 to 1.07 days; p=0.40).

CONCLUSION

UAS leads to a lower rate of post-operative fever and infection. However, UAS did not significantly reduce or increase the SFR or the rate of ureteral injuries during RIRS for patients with urolithiasis. The use of UAS should be considered to decrease the risk of infectious complications, particularly in those who may be at higher risk for such complications.

Для цитирования: de Amorim Lucas Guimarães Campos Roriz, Campos Marcelo Esteves Chaves, Dumont Lígia Sant'Ana, Peñafiel José Augusto Rojas, de Abreu Eliabe Silva, Marchini Giovanni Scala, Monga Manoj, Mazzucchi Eduardo. Retrograde intrarenal surgery with or without ureteral access sheath: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. 2024. DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2024.0452.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.