MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0345426

Медицинская библиотека · PloS one · 2026

A multicenter prospective validation cohort does not support the use of kidney/psoas [18F]FDG uptake in the diagnosis of kidney allograft subclinical rejection.

Lovinfosse Pierre, Bouquegneau Antoine, Massart Annick, Pipeleers Lissa, Bonvoisin Catherine, Carp Laurens, Everaert Hendrik, Jadoul Alexandre, Dendooven Amélie, Geers Caroline, Grosch Stéphanie, Erpicum Pauline, Hellemans Rachel, Seidel Laurence, Weekers Laurent, Hustinx Roland, Jouret François

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Subclinical kidney allograft acute rejection (SCR) corresponds to "the unexpected histological evidence of acute rejection in a stable patient". The diagnosis of SCR relies on surveillance biopsy. Positron emission tomography (PET/CT) after injection of F18-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) has been proposed as a non-invasive screening approach. In the present multicenter prospective study, we assess the diagnostic yield [18F]FDGPET/CT to rule out SCR in stable KTR at 3 months post KTx.

METHODS

From 01/2021-03/2025, we prospectively combined surveillance biopsy and [18F]FDGPET/CT at ~3 months post transplantation in adult kidney transplant recipients from 4 independent imaging centers. The mean standardized uptake value (mSUV) was measured in kidney cortex and referenced as a ratio to psoas muscle mSUV (mSUVR).

RESULTS

Our multicenter cohort of 185 patients was categorized according to the Banff-2022 classification as: normal (n = 158); borderline (n = 18); SCR (n = 9, including 6 T-cell-mediated rejection and 3 microvascular inflammation). No significant correlation was observed between the mSUVR and ti score (R = 0.032, p-value = 0.67). The mSUVR reached 2.33 [1.97-2.93], 2.71 [2.50-3.33] and 2.42 [2.27-3.14] in normal, borderline and SCR groups, respectively. In multivariate models stratified by center, the risk of non-normal histology (n = 27, including borderline and SCR) increased with donor age (OR=1.05 [1.01-1.1], p = 0.02) but not with the mSUVR (OR=4.11 [0.91-18.48], p = 0.07). The Z-score of mSUVR was significantly associated with the risk of non-normal histology (OR=1.542 [1.02-2.33, p = 0.04). The risk of biopsy-proven SCR (n = 9) was not significantly associated with mSUVR.

CONCLUSIONS

The mSUVR of [18F]FDG PET/CT does not reliably rule out SCR on surveillance biopsy.

Для цитирования: Lovinfosse Pierre, Bouquegneau Antoine, Massart Annick, Pipeleers Lissa, Bonvoisin Catherine, Carp Laurens, Everaert Hendrik, Jadoul Alexandre, Dendooven Amélie, Geers Caroline, Grosch Stéphanie, Erpicum Pauline, Hellemans Rachel, Seidel Laurence, Weekers Laurent, Hustinx Roland, Jouret François. A multicenter prospective validation cohort does not support the use of kidney/psoas [18F]FDG uptake in the diagnosis of kidney allograft subclinical rejection.. PloS one. 2026. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0345426.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.