Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2023
Reliability of Ultrasound Imaging in Examining Integrity and Inflammation in the Dorsalis Pedis Artery.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Boman Robyn, Penkala Stefania, Chan Rosa H M, Joshua Fredrick, Cheung Roy T H
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Assessment of small vessel inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid vasculitis is challenging. Small arteries such as the dorsalis pedis artery (DPA) are difficult to assess for changes in the arterial wall with medical imaging. Ultrasound imaging is a viable tool for examining the integrity and inflammatory changes in the arterial wall; however, no empirical data on its reliability have been described.
METHODS: We measured the intra- and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound measurements across five parameters evaluating arterial integrity of the proximal DPA in participants with and without small vessel disease. We recruited 10 participants with rheumatoid arthritis and 10 healthy controls. Two sonographers using ultrasound independently measured DPA lumen diameter, artery diameter, lumen-to-arterial diameter ratio, arterial Doppler velocity and inflammatory changes in the proximal wall of the DPA. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate 95% confidence intervals within and between raters. Bland-Altman analyses were used to assess limits of agreement and were compared with minimal clinically important differences (MCID).
RESULTS: Four of five selected parameters were found to have excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability within and between raters (ICC = 0.903-0.996). Acceptable reliability was found for measurement of arterial blood flow velocity within raters (ICC = 0.815-0.909), but not between raters (ICC = 0.634). Standard mean errors in all parameters were within minimal clinically important differences.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound imaging has been found to be a reliable method of assessment of arterial integrity and inflammation of the proximal DPA in people with small vessel disease. Evaluation of arterial blood flow velocity requires cautious interpretation.
METHODS: We measured the intra- and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound measurements across five parameters evaluating arterial integrity of the proximal DPA in participants with and without small vessel disease. We recruited 10 participants with rheumatoid arthritis and 10 healthy controls. Two sonographers using ultrasound independently measured DPA lumen diameter, artery diameter, lumen-to-arterial diameter ratio, arterial Doppler velocity and inflammatory changes in the proximal wall of the DPA. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate 95% confidence intervals within and between raters. Bland-Altman analyses were used to assess limits of agreement and were compared with minimal clinically important differences (MCID).
RESULTS: Four of five selected parameters were found to have excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability within and between raters (ICC = 0.903-0.996). Acceptable reliability was found for measurement of arterial blood flow velocity within raters (ICC = 0.815-0.909), but not between raters (ICC = 0.634). Standard mean errors in all parameters were within minimal clinically important differences.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound imaging has been found to be a reliable method of assessment of arterial integrity and inflammation of the proximal DPA in people with small vessel disease. Evaluation of arterial blood flow velocity requires cautious interpretation.