Hip & pelvis · 2026
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Comparative Assessment of Cam and Pincer Hip Morphology between Soccer Players and Non-athlete Controls.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aydin Deniz, Kucukciloglu Yasemin
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Primary cam and pincer type morphology of the hip can lead to femoroacetabular impingement and osteoarthritis. This study aimed to assess and compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiological parameters of hip morphology between young male semi-professional soccer players and non-athlete controls.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study included a retrospective review of MRI scans of young male soccer players and an age- and sex-matched control group obtained from a hospital radiology database. Lateral center edge angle, acetabular version, alpha angle, collodiaphyseal angle, and femoral head coverage ratio were recorded and compared between groups.
RESULTS: Bilateral hip MRI scans of 30 young male soccer players and 30 non-athletes were analyzed. The mean age of participants was 24.88±5.10 years (range, 15-34 years). In the non-athlete control group, anteversion was higher in both hips (P=0.02 for right hip and P=0.05 for left hip) and reached statistical significance for the right hip. The collodiaphyseal angle was higher in the soccer-player group (P=0.01 for the right hip and P=0.03 for the left hip). The femoral head coverage ratio was significantly higher in the control group (P=0.02 for the right hip and P=0.01 for the left hip). No significant difference was observed in lateral center edge angle or alpha angle between groups.
CONCLUSION: Differences in collodiaphyseal angle, acetabular anteversion, and femoral head coverage ratio indicate partial variation in femoroacetabular morphology between groups; however, no evidence showed a higher incidence of cam or pincer morphology in soccer players.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study included a retrospective review of MRI scans of young male soccer players and an age- and sex-matched control group obtained from a hospital radiology database. Lateral center edge angle, acetabular version, alpha angle, collodiaphyseal angle, and femoral head coverage ratio were recorded and compared between groups.
RESULTS: Bilateral hip MRI scans of 30 young male soccer players and 30 non-athletes were analyzed. The mean age of participants was 24.88±5.10 years (range, 15-34 years). In the non-athlete control group, anteversion was higher in both hips (P=0.02 for right hip and P=0.05 for left hip) and reached statistical significance for the right hip. The collodiaphyseal angle was higher in the soccer-player group (P=0.01 for the right hip and P=0.03 for the left hip). The femoral head coverage ratio was significantly higher in the control group (P=0.02 for the right hip and P=0.01 for the left hip). No significant difference was observed in lateral center edge angle or alpha angle between groups.
CONCLUSION: Differences in collodiaphyseal angle, acetabular anteversion, and femoral head coverage ratio indicate partial variation in femoroacetabular morphology between groups; however, no evidence showed a higher incidence of cam or pincer morphology in soccer players.