DOI 10.3390/diagnostics15212703
Quadratic Spline Fitting for Robust Measurement of Thoracic Kyphosis Using Key Vertebral Landmarks.
Аннотация
Objective
The purpose of this study is to present a kyphosis measurement method based on quadratic spline fitting through three key vertebral landmarks: T12, T8 and T4. This approach aims to capture thoracic spine curvature more continuously and accurately than traditional methods such as the Cobb angle and circle fitting.
Methods
A dataset of 560 lateral thoracic spine radiographs was retrospectively analyzed, including cases of postural kyphosis, Scheuermann's disease, osteoporosis-induced kyphosis and ankylosing spondylitis. Two trained raters independently performed three repeated landmark annotations per image. The kyphosis angle was computed using two methods: (1) a quadratic spline fitted through the three landmarks, with the angle derived from tangent vectors at T12 and T4; and (2) a least-squares circle fit with the angle subtended between T12 and T4. Agreement with reference Cobb angles was evaluated using Pearson correlation, MAE, RMSE, ROC analysis and Bland-Altman plots. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
Results
Both methods showed excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability (ICC ≥ 0.967). The spline method achieved lower MAE (5.81°), lower RMSE (8.94°) and smaller bias compared to the circle method. Both methods showed strong correlation with Cobb angles (r ≥ 0.851) and excellent classification performance (AUC > 0.950).
Conclusions
Spline-based kyphosis measurement is accurate, reliable and particularly robust in cases with severe spinal deformity. Significance: This method supports automated, reproducible kyphosis assessment and may enhance clinical evaluation of spinal curvature using artificial intelligence-driven image analysis.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.