Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2022
Iontophoresis of treprostinil promotes wound healing in a murine model of scleroderma-related ulcers.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kotzki Sylvain, Savina Yann, Bouvet Raphael, Gil Hugo, Blaise Sophie, Cracowski Jean-Luc, Roustit Matthieu
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare, chronic disease characterized by fibrosis, vascular alterations and digital ulcerations. Few drugs have shown efficacy to enhance wound healing of existing SSc-related ulcers. Local delivery of treprostinil, a prostacyclin analogue, may improve wound healing. The present work aimed first at developing a mouse model of SSc-related ulcerations and second at assessing the effect of iontophoresis of treprostinil on wound healing.
METHODS: We used two murine models of SSc: chemically induced with HOCl, and urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR)-deficient. Excisional wounding was performed on the dorsal midline with a biopsy punch. Animals were randomized into three groups: treated with electrostimulation alone, with treprostinil iontophoresis or untreated. We assessed wound healing over time, as well as skin microvascular reactivity, inflammation, microvessel density and collagen distribution, before wounding and after re-epithelialization.
RESULTS: uPAR-/- mice, but not HOCl-treated mice, showed impaired wound healing and decreased microvascular reactivity compared with their controls. Treprostinil iontophoresis improved wound healing and microvascular density and decreased inflammation in uPAR-/- mice, while electro-stimulation did not. However, treprostinil had no effect on microvascular reactivity and collagen distribution.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that excisional wounds in uPAR-/- mice are a relevant model of SSc-related ulcers. In addition, treprostinil iontophoresis enhances wound healing in this model. Further work in now needed to show whether this effect translates in humans.
METHODS: We used two murine models of SSc: chemically induced with HOCl, and urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR)-deficient. Excisional wounding was performed on the dorsal midline with a biopsy punch. Animals were randomized into three groups: treated with electrostimulation alone, with treprostinil iontophoresis or untreated. We assessed wound healing over time, as well as skin microvascular reactivity, inflammation, microvessel density and collagen distribution, before wounding and after re-epithelialization.
RESULTS: uPAR-/- mice, but not HOCl-treated mice, showed impaired wound healing and decreased microvascular reactivity compared with their controls. Treprostinil iontophoresis improved wound healing and microvascular density and decreased inflammation in uPAR-/- mice, while electro-stimulation did not. However, treprostinil had no effect on microvascular reactivity and collagen distribution.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that excisional wounds in uPAR-/- mice are a relevant model of SSc-related ulcers. In addition, treprostinil iontophoresis enhances wound healing in this model. Further work in now needed to show whether this effect translates in humans.