Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons · 2026
Revision arthrodesis after first metatarsophalangeal joint arthroplasty: A nationwide analysis of implant type and revision-related factors.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Arslan Arslan Kağan, Ülgen Nuri Koray, Yiğit Nihat, Bingöl İzzet, Ata Naim, Birinci Şuayip, Bozkurt İbrahim, Biçer Kadir Eren, Atalay Melih, Yıldırım Fidancı Aydan, Akkurt Mehmet Orçun
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: First metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthroplasty is used as a motion-preserving option for hallux rigidus, but revision risk remains a concern.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent first MTP joint arthroplasty in the Turkish national electronic health database between January 2018 and December 2023. Revision arthrodesis was assessed through November 20, 2025. Demographics, implant type, bilaterality, and comorbidities were compared between revised and non-revised patients.
RESULTS: Among 901 patients, 192 underwent revision arthrodesis, yielding an observed cumulative revision rate of 21.3%. Revisions occurred frequently within 24 months. Total arthroplasty had a higher revision rate than hemiarthroplasty (23.4% vs 15.5%) and remained independently associated with revision after adjustment. Increasing age was associated with lower revision likelihood, whereas comorbidities were not independent predictors.
CONCLUSION: First MTP arthroplasty showed a substantial revision burden, particularly after total arthroplasty.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent first MTP joint arthroplasty in the Turkish national electronic health database between January 2018 and December 2023. Revision arthrodesis was assessed through November 20, 2025. Demographics, implant type, bilaterality, and comorbidities were compared between revised and non-revised patients.
RESULTS: Among 901 patients, 192 underwent revision arthrodesis, yielding an observed cumulative revision rate of 21.3%. Revisions occurred frequently within 24 months. Total arthroplasty had a higher revision rate than hemiarthroplasty (23.4% vs 15.5%) and remained independently associated with revision after adjustment. Increasing age was associated with lower revision likelihood, whereas comorbidities were not independent predictors.
CONCLUSION: First MTP arthroplasty showed a substantial revision burden, particularly after total arthroplasty.