Arthroplasty today · 2025
Outcomes After Patellofemoral Arthroplasty With the Arthrex iBalance-A Third Generation Implant.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bond Elizabeth C, Reinke Emily K, Zirbes Christian, Poehlein Emily, Green Cynthia L, Danilkowicz Richard M, Amendola Annunziato
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) is an attractive option for patients who have isolated patellofemoral disease. This study aimed to assess the functional outcomes and revision rates of primary PFA with a third-generation implant with short- to medium-term follow-up.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 49 patients (70 knees) undergoing PFA with the iBalance system by a single surgeon at a quaternary center between January 2015 and September 2022 for demographic and surgical data, as well as complications and revision rates. Patient-reported outcome scores were then collected.
RESULTS: The population was majority female (81.6%) with a median age of 50 years. Four knees were revised to a total knee arthroplasty (5.7%) at an average time point of 2.3 years postoperatively (range: 1.3-3.5 years). The median Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score at the time of follow-up was 82.5, while the median Kujala score was 72. Lower preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence grade was significantly associated with lower Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores in all 5 domains (P < .05 for all). Additional procedures were required in 17 knees (24.3%), in most cases to improve patella tracking.
CONCLUSIONS: This study is, to our knowledge, the first to examine outcomes of the iBalance PFA system. The results show favorable patient-reported outcomes in this cohort consistent with other 2nd and 3rd generation PFA implants, along with a revision rate similar to its prosthetic peers.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 49 patients (70 knees) undergoing PFA with the iBalance system by a single surgeon at a quaternary center between January 2015 and September 2022 for demographic and surgical data, as well as complications and revision rates. Patient-reported outcome scores were then collected.
RESULTS: The population was majority female (81.6%) with a median age of 50 years. Four knees were revised to a total knee arthroplasty (5.7%) at an average time point of 2.3 years postoperatively (range: 1.3-3.5 years). The median Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score at the time of follow-up was 82.5, while the median Kujala score was 72. Lower preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence grade was significantly associated with lower Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores in all 5 domains (P < .05 for all). Additional procedures were required in 17 knees (24.3%), in most cases to improve patella tracking.
CONCLUSIONS: This study is, to our knowledge, the first to examine outcomes of the iBalance PFA system. The results show favorable patient-reported outcomes in this cohort consistent with other 2nd and 3rd generation PFA implants, along with a revision rate similar to its prosthetic peers.