Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine · 2023
Use of supported standing in males with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Individual and family perspectives.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bonarrigo Kelly, McGuire Michelle, Dorich Jenny M, Bolger Ashlee, Lambert Joshua, Horn Paul S, Tian Cuixia
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore stander use in individuals with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD).
METHODS: This mixed method research study employed a survey with categorical and open-ended questions related to stander use. Categorical responses were analyzed quantitatively. Qualitative analysis of open-ended responses was linked to the International Classification of Function. Qualitative and quantitative results were merged to derive meta-inferences.
RESULTS: Of 147 respondents, 28.6% (n = 42) reported stander use. Equipment used included sit-to-stand stander (n = 27), power standing feature in a wheelchair (n = 13), and unspecified equipment (n = 2). Economic services were the most common barrier to stander obtainment. Age of loss of ambulation (LOA) and age of start of stander use were positively correlated (r = 0.61, p < 0.0001, n = 36), with 59.5% initiating stander use after LOA. Twenty-nine respondents reported standing less than the recommended dose of 60-90 minutes at least five days a week, with frequency directionally less than five days per week (p = 0.06) and time significantly less than 60-90 minutes (p = 0.002). Respondents' total dose was significantly lower than the recommended 300 minutes (p = 0.02). Lack of time and presence of contractures contributed to decreased duration of use.
CONCLUSION: This study provides a greater understanding of stander use among individuals with DMD and can assist with decision making about stander use prior to complications of disease progression to promote optimal health despite reported barriers.
METHODS: This mixed method research study employed a survey with categorical and open-ended questions related to stander use. Categorical responses were analyzed quantitatively. Qualitative analysis of open-ended responses was linked to the International Classification of Function. Qualitative and quantitative results were merged to derive meta-inferences.
RESULTS: Of 147 respondents, 28.6% (n = 42) reported stander use. Equipment used included sit-to-stand stander (n = 27), power standing feature in a wheelchair (n = 13), and unspecified equipment (n = 2). Economic services were the most common barrier to stander obtainment. Age of loss of ambulation (LOA) and age of start of stander use were positively correlated (r = 0.61, p < 0.0001, n = 36), with 59.5% initiating stander use after LOA. Twenty-nine respondents reported standing less than the recommended dose of 60-90 minutes at least five days a week, with frequency directionally less than five days per week (p = 0.06) and time significantly less than 60-90 minutes (p = 0.002). Respondents' total dose was significantly lower than the recommended 300 minutes (p = 0.02). Lack of time and presence of contractures contributed to decreased duration of use.
CONCLUSION: This study provides a greater understanding of stander use among individuals with DMD and can assist with decision making about stander use prior to complications of disease progression to promote optimal health despite reported barriers.