MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1638/2013-0140r1.1

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine : official publication of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians · 2014

The use of magnetic resonance imaging to better define hoof pathology in the reticulated giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis reticulata).

Wakeman Kyle A, Sanchez Carlos R, Lung Nancy P, Hersman Jake, Barrett Myra F

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A 22-yr-old bull giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis reticulata) with severely altered hoof conformation in both forelimbs was presented for necropsy following acute mortality. Due to multiple challenges that prevented safe immobilization, corrective hoof trimming procedures were never performed on this animal. To better define the extent of the damage of the soft tissue structures and bone within the hoof, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system was used to obtain images of these structures. The MRI study found evidence of severe osteolysis, phalangeal fractures of both forelimbs, and tenosynovitis of several tendon sheaths. These findings help demonstrate the impact that hoof overgrowth can have on internal structures within the hoof. By managing hoof problems early in the course of disease and investing in appropriate facilities that make giraffe immobilization safer, morbidity and mortality associated with hoof disease and overgrowth can potentially be reduced.

Для цитирования: Wakeman Kyle A, Sanchez Carlos R, Lung Nancy P, Hersman Jake, Barrett Myra F. The use of magnetic resonance imaging to better define hoof pathology in the reticulated giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis reticulata).. Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine : official publication of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians. 2014. DOI: 10.1638/2013-0140r1.1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.