Journal of integrative and complementary medicine · 2026
Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Medicines in Managing Pain of Calcaneal Spur: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pramanik Pratima, Bharti Veena Prakash, Hait Himangsu, Singh Navin Kumar, Dutta Abhijit
Аннотация
AIM: Calcaneal spur is a common cause of chronic heel pain and functional disability. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of individualized homeopathic (IH) medicines compared to placebo (PL) in managing this condition.
METHOD: In this double-blind, randomized, PL-controlled trial, 128 participants with chronic heel pain from calcaneal spur were randomly assigned to receive either IH (n = 64) or an identical PL (n = 64) for 6 months. Both groups received standard advice on general management (such as foot exercises and contrast baths). The primary outcome was the change in pain intensity from baseline measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary outcome was the change in lower extremity function measured by the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Analysis was done using an intention-to-treat approach with a mixed-effects model for repeated measures.
RESULTS: The analysis revealed a statistically significant group × time interaction for VAS pain scores (F-value = 35.12, p < 0.001). At 6 months, the IH group showed a significantly greater mean reduction in pain compared to the PL group (mean difference: -33.28; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -44.3 to -22.2; p < 0.001). Similarly, a significant group × time interaction was observed for LEFS scores (F-value = 33.87, p < 0.001). At 6 months, the IH group had a greater improvement in function (mean difference: 13.78; 95% CI: 9.1-18.4; p < 0.001). Both results were clinically significant. No serious adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Individualized homeopathy resulted in statistically and clinically significant improvements in pain and function for patients with calcaneal spur compared to PL. These findings suggest that homeopathy may be a viable treatment option for this condition.
METHOD: In this double-blind, randomized, PL-controlled trial, 128 participants with chronic heel pain from calcaneal spur were randomly assigned to receive either IH (n = 64) or an identical PL (n = 64) for 6 months. Both groups received standard advice on general management (such as foot exercises and contrast baths). The primary outcome was the change in pain intensity from baseline measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary outcome was the change in lower extremity function measured by the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Analysis was done using an intention-to-treat approach with a mixed-effects model for repeated measures.
RESULTS: The analysis revealed a statistically significant group × time interaction for VAS pain scores (F-value = 35.12, p < 0.001). At 6 months, the IH group showed a significantly greater mean reduction in pain compared to the PL group (mean difference: -33.28; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -44.3 to -22.2; p < 0.001). Similarly, a significant group × time interaction was observed for LEFS scores (F-value = 33.87, p < 0.001). At 6 months, the IH group had a greater improvement in function (mean difference: 13.78; 95% CI: 9.1-18.4; p < 0.001). Both results were clinically significant. No serious adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Individualized homeopathy resulted in statistically and clinically significant improvements in pain and function for patients with calcaneal spur compared to PL. These findings suggest that homeopathy may be a viable treatment option for this condition.