MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/036354659001800302

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of sports medicine · 1990

Magnetic resonance imaging of the glenoid labrum.

Gross M L, Seeger L L, Smith J B, Mandelbaum B R, Finerman G A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Shoulder complaints are common in the athletic population. Successful treatment is dependent upon the ability to correctly identify the pathologic changes associated with a specific disorder and arrive at an accurate diagnosis. Labral abnormalities are traditionally associated with glenohumeral instability. Isolated labral tears or degenerative changes may also cause shoulder dysfunction. A reliable clinical tool to assess the status of the labrum would be useful for diagnosis and management of shoulder disorders. The magnetic resonance images of 48 shoulders that had subsequent surgical examination of their labra were reviewed with respect to labral appearance. Labra appearing as abnormal were further classified as torn, degenerative, or eroded. Surgical examination was used as the reference standard. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated high levels of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy for evaluation of the glenoid labrum. Magnetic resonance imaging is a reliable and accurate method for depicting the status of the glenoid labrum. Magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the labrum may assist the clinician in distinguishing the varying forms of shoulder dysfunction and facilitate diagnosis and effective treatment.

Для цитирования: Gross M L, Seeger L L, Smith J B, Mandelbaum B R, Finerman G A. Magnetic resonance imaging of the glenoid labrum.. The American journal of sports medicine. 1990. DOI: 10.1177/036354659001800302.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.