Investigative radiology · 1993
Susceptibility effects of bone trabeculae. Quantification in vivo using an asymmetric spin-echo technique.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sugimoto H, Kimura T, Ohsawa T
Аннотация
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors assessed the capability of magnetic resonance imaging in measuring bone mineral density in vivo.
METHODS: Using the in-phase asymmetric spin-echo technique, the susceptibility effect (T2*susceptibility) was measured in lumbar vertebrae in vivo. Calcium density was measured with single energy quantitative computed tomography scan. The values of the susceptibility effect were correlated with calcium density.
RESULTS: A statistically significant positive correlation was observed between signal loss due to susceptibility-induced inhomogeneity and the calcium density in the region of interest. The change in 1/T2*susceptibility per unit change in density was 0.114 seconds-1/mg/cm3. T2*susceptibility was 14.3 mseconds in volunteers and 17.4 mseconds in postoophorectomy patients.
CONCLUSIONS: To some extent, quantification of bone density is possible using magnetic resonance imaging; however, the relatively wide dispersion of the susceptibility effect, plotted against the calcium density in the axial skeleton, indicates that other factors, such as the three-dimensional structure of bone trabeculae, may play important roles in determining magnetic resonance parameters.
METHODS: Using the in-phase asymmetric spin-echo technique, the susceptibility effect (T2*susceptibility) was measured in lumbar vertebrae in vivo. Calcium density was measured with single energy quantitative computed tomography scan. The values of the susceptibility effect were correlated with calcium density.
RESULTS: A statistically significant positive correlation was observed between signal loss due to susceptibility-induced inhomogeneity and the calcium density in the region of interest. The change in 1/T2*susceptibility per unit change in density was 0.114 seconds-1/mg/cm3. T2*susceptibility was 14.3 mseconds in volunteers and 17.4 mseconds in postoophorectomy patients.
CONCLUSIONS: To some extent, quantification of bone density is possible using magnetic resonance imaging; however, the relatively wide dispersion of the susceptibility effect, plotted against the calcium density in the axial skeleton, indicates that other factors, such as the three-dimensional structure of bone trabeculae, may play important roles in determining magnetic resonance parameters.