MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/00365549309008533

Медицинская библиотека · Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases · 1993

Involvement of dogs in plague epidemiology in Tanzania. Serological observations in domestic animals in Lushoto District.

Kilonzo B S, Gisakanyi N D, Sabuni C A

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Venous blood was collected aseptically from clinically healthy domestic dogs, goats, sheep, cats and fowl in various plague-infected villages of Lushoto District, Tanzania, at the time when the disease was actively prevalent in the area. Flea ectoparasites were collected from the animals, processed, identified and counted. Serum samples were tested for specific plague antibodies, using the passive haemagglutination technique and checked by passive haemagglutination inhibition tests. Altogether 389 animals, of which 201 were domestic dogs, were involved. 11 (5.5%) dogs had significantly elevated specific plague antibodies at titres ranging from 20 to 1280. All the dogs were also heavily infested with fleas at a mean index of 7.7 fleas per animal. Of 1,871 fleas collected from the dogs, 93.8% were Ctenocephalides felis and 6.2% were C. canis. All the other animals examined were negative for plague. It was concluded that domestic dogs could play an important role as plague carriers in the area and that the animals could serve as sentinel animals for the detection of plague in villages where human plague outbreaks have not previously occurred.

Для цитирования: Kilonzo B S, Gisakanyi N D, Sabuni C A. Involvement of dogs in plague epidemiology in Tanzania. Serological observations in domestic animals in Lushoto District.. Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases. 1993. DOI: 10.3109/00365549309008533.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.